Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
BUF2
FinalSat, Jan 25, 2025Every game that night
EDM3

EDM beat BUF 3-2, with the chances close: 4.25 expected goals to 4.55. R. Nugent-Hopkins led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). J.Kulich had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 2.0. S. Skinner stopped 39 of 41.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
BUF1102
EDM1113
  1. 1st 16:28BUFA. Tuch0.09 xG
  2. 1st 16:45EDMJ. Skinner0.28 xG
  3. 2nd 7:46BUFJ.Kulich0.09 xG
  4. 2nd 13:20EDMR. Nugent-Hopkins0.07 xG
  5. 3rd 8:59EDMR. Nugent-Hopkins0.17 xG

Team Stats

BUFEDM
41Shots on goal34
4.55Expected goals4.25
73Shot attempts57
285v5 shots on goal30
0/3Power play0/1
29Hits15
7Blocked shots16
2Penalty minutes6
16Giveaways14
7Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

BUF 4.55 xGEDM 4.25 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdBUF goal, 16:28EDM goal, 16:45BUF goal, 7:46EDM goal, 13:20EDM goal, 8:59

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

BUF40 on goal, 2 scored
EDM33 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

BUF Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. TuchRW101231+1019:192:49
J.KulichC1017010016:222:44
D. CozensC011430+1016:122:46
J. ZuckerLW0113000015:052:41
R. McLeodC0001000019:000:15
J. PeterkaRW000300-1018:343:14
J. QuinnRW0001100018:023:15
P. KrebsC0004300216:560:00
T. ThompsonC000500-1016:533:11
Z. BensonLW0001000013:543:02
S. LaffertyC000130-109:070:00
B. MalenstynLW000120-108:070:00
O. PowerD0112110021:322:09
J. BrysonD0111100012:180:00
R. DahlinD000232-1024:063:51
B. ByramD000020-1021:010:03
M. SamuelssonD000341-1020:220:00
H. JokiharjuD0000310013:050:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Reimer34313.91258:05Loss
U. Luukkonen000–0:00

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
R. Nugent-HopkinsC202401+2015:511:53
J. SkinnerLW101222+1010:441:18
K. KapanenRW0111200210:330:00
L. DraisaitlC0003000022:361:44
Z. HymanLW000100-1218:441:31
A. HenriqueC0000220016:390:16
V. ArvidssonLW0000000015:370:29
C. BrownRW000500+1015:030:00
M. JanmarkC000101+1014:510:00
C. PerryRW000300+1014:090:42
V. PodkolzinRW000030-1014:050:00
N. PhilpC000100-106:490:00
E. BouchardD0113230024:221:45
D. NurseD011320+1023:410:15
M. EkholmD011312+2023:000:07
T. EmbersonD0111110014:560:00
B. KulakD000303-1020:140:00
T. StecherD0000010212:060:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Skinner41392.95160:00Win
C. Pickard000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamRyan McLeod BUF Faces EDM, his team until Jun 20241 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreBUF 2.7, EDM 3.7BUF 2, EDM 3
Total goals6.45
Shots on goalBUF 25.3, EDM 32.6BUF 41, EDM 34
Win chanceEDM 66%EDM won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM Z. Hyman3.110.92041%0
EDM L. Draisaitl3.131.60047%0
BUF T. Thompson3.050.85036%0
EDM E. Bouchard2.630.94117%0
EDM V. Arvidsson2.400.66022%0
BUF J. Peterka2.230.61023%0
EDM D. Nurse2.230.46111%0
BUF J. Zucker2.230.64126%0
BUF R. Dahlin2.120.63014%0
BUF D. Cozens2.140.53121%0
BUF A. Tuch2.020.66125%1
EDM M. Ekholm2.030.50112%0
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins2.040.85225%2
BUF J.Kulich2.070.35118%1
BUF J. Quinn1.810.51020%0
EDM J. Skinner1.820.48121%1
EDM V. Podkolzin1.500.37014%0
EDM B. Kulak1.530.3507%0
BUF Z. Benson1.410.39016%0
EDM A. Henrique1.300.46021%0
EDM C. Brown1.350.37011%0
BUF O. Power1.320.3617%0
EDM C. Perry1.230.39017%0
BUF R. McLeod1.210.40016%0
BUF B. Byram1.100.39011%0
BUF P. Krebs1.040.33010%0
EDM K. Kapanen1.010.30112%0
EDM N. Philp1.010.2709%0
BUF M. Samuelsson0.930.1804%0
EDM M. Janmark0.810.31011%0
EDM T. Emberson0.810.2513%0
BUF B. Malenstyn0.810.1707%0
BUF H. Jokiharju0.800.1403%0
EDM T. Stecher0.700.1504%0
BUF S. Lafferty0.710.1708%0
BUF J. Bryson0.310.1112%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.