Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
BUF3
Final/OTMon, Mar 3, 2025Every game that night
MTL4

MTL beat BUF 4-3 in overtime despite fewer good chances: 3.15 expected goals to 4.67. BUF outshot MTL 36 to 20. N. Suzuki led the way with 4 points (1 G, 3 A). R. Dahlin had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.4. S. Montembeault stopped 33 of 36.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
BUF01203
MTL30014
  1. 1st 9:42MTLC. CaufieldPP0.15 xG
  2. 1st 11:41MTLN. SuzukiSH0.16 xG
  3. 1st 13:42MTLJ. SlafkovskýPP0.18 xG
  4. 2nd 18:07BUFA. Tuch0.43 xG
  5. 3rd 3:24BUFT. Thompson0.02 xG
  6. 3rd 18:59BUFR. Dahlin0.05 xG
  7. OT 1:21MTLM. Matheson0.08 xG

Team Stats

BUFMTL
36Shots on goal20
4.67Expected goals3.15
87Shot attempts41
245v5 shots on goal12
0/4Power play2/5
37Hits20
10Blocked shots24
12Penalty minutes10
12Giveaways14
4Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

BUF 4.67 xGMTL 3.15 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdOTMTL goal, 9:42MTL goal, 11:41MTL goal, 13:42BUF goal, 18:07BUF goal, 3:24BUF goal, 18:59MTL goal, 1:21

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

BUF36 on goal, 3 scored
MTL18 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

BUF Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. PeterkaRW022600+1220:226:29
A. TuchRW101401+1021:426:45
T. ThompsonC101500+1018:366:00
D. CozensC0114600217:192:00
J.KulichC011011+1015:131:23
J. GreenwayLW000021+1017:050:00
J. QuinnRW000311-1014:166:38
R. McLeodC0000100013:080:00
B. MalenstynLW0000500012:040:02
Z. BensonLW0002100011:311:14
P. KrebsC0000300011:140:26
S. LaffertyC000330009:460:04
R. DahlinD101641+2625:344:58
J. BrysonD011000+1016:110:00
D. GilbertD0110220011:400:00
B. ByramD000110+2224:591:20
O. PowerD000213-1021:102:41
C. CliftonD0000600014:450:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Reimer20164.80060:24OT loss
U. Luukkonen000–0:00

MTL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. SuzukiC134410-1020:115:30
J. SlafkovskýLW1123400017:295:33
C. CaufieldRW101302-1017:445:30
J. ArmiaRW000030-1018:512:52
J. EvansC000023-1016:330:03
C. DvorakC0001000215:480:02
J. AndersonRW0000100015:280:00
E. HeinemanLW000011-1013:202:50
A. NewhookC0002010413:142:50
P. LaineLW0001000013:035:31
B. GallagherRW0000000012:562:51
O. BeckC000011007:490:00
M. MathesonD1121140028:222:46
L. HutsonD0220120019:115:39
A. CarrierD000205-2220:510:00
D. SavardD0000110017:050:00
J. StrubleD0000230215:180:08
A. XhekajD000321-1013:080:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Montembeault36333.91761:03Win
J. Dobes000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreBUF 3.1, MTL 3.1BUF 3, MTL 4
Total goals6.27
Shots on goalBUF 27.3, MTL 27.5BUF 36, MTL 20
Win chanceMTL 51%MTL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
BUF T. Thompson3.150.92138%1
MTL C. Caufield3.130.84134%1
BUF J. Peterka2.560.75228%0
BUF A. Tuch2.440.82130%1
BUF R. Dahlin2.460.77115%1
BUF D. Cozens2.140.58122%0
BUF J.Kulich2.100.44122%0
MTL P. Laine2.010.66026%0
MTL N. Suzuki2.040.94428%1
MTL M. Matheson2.010.65212%1
MTL B. Gallagher2.000.45020%0
BUF J. Quinn1.930.56022%0
MTL J. Slafkovský1.730.62220%1
BUF O. Power1.620.4407%0
MTL J. Armia1.600.38017%0
MTL J. Anderson1.500.34018%0
BUF J. Greenway1.500.36015%0
MTL C. Dvorak1.410.44016%0
MTL A. Newhook1.420.46019%0
BUF R. McLeod1.400.53021%0
BUF Z. Benson1.320.36014%0
BUF B. Byram1.310.49012%0
MTL L. Hutson1.200.7627%0
MTL A. Carrier1.220.3806%0
MTL A. Xhekaj1.230.1906%0
MTL E. Heineman1.200.41018%0
MTL O. Beck1.100.22010%0
MTL J. Evans1.100.45014%0
BUF P. Krebs1.100.31010%0
MTL J. Struble0.900.2406%0
BUF B. Malenstyn0.800.1807%0
MTL D. Savard0.700.2805%0
BUF S. Lafferty0.730.1909%0
BUF C. Clifton0.700.1703%0
BUF J. Bryson0.400.1512%0
BUF D. Gilbert0.400.1612%0

Shots on goal: 13 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.