EDM beat CGY 5-1, and the chances backed it up: 5.66 expected goals to 2.02. EDM outshot CGY 39 to 19. C. McDavid led the way with 5 points (0 G, 5 A). Z. Hyman had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 3.0. C. Ingram stopped 18 of 19.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGY | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| EDM | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
- 1st 6:48EDMR. Nugent-Hopkins0.47 xG
- 1st 15:58CGYM. Weegar0.04 xG
- 1st 19:43EDML. DraisaitlPP0.11 xG
- 2nd 1:59EDML. DraisaitlPP0.15 xG
- 2nd 11:56EDMZ. Hyman0.20 xG
- 3rd 5:38EDML. DraisaitlPP0.05 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
CGY 2.02 xGEDM 5.66 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
CGY Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Backlund | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:24 | 0:00 |
| J. Huberdeau | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19:06 | 4:37 |
| N. Kadri | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:57 | 4:29 |
| M. Coronato | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 16:20 | 3:17 |
| J. Farabee | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:12 | 2:24 |
| M. Frost | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:29 | 4:34 |
| B. Coleman | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:54 | 2:30 |
| C. Zary | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14:30 | 2:28 |
| Y. Sharangovich | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:58 | 2:35 |
| A. Klapka | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12:27 | 1:21 |
| J. Beecher | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 9:58 | 0:00 |
| R. Lomberg | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 9:54 | 0:00 |
| M. Weegar | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 22 | 9:05 | 0:00 |
| R. Andersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 4 | 24:00 | 3:54 |
| K. Bahl | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 5 | 22:43 | 0:01 |
| Y. Kuznetsov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 10 | 20:56 | 0:00 |
| J. Hanley | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 12 | 18:31 | 0:00 |
| H. Brzustewicz | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:12 | 3:10 |
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 20:37 | 5:10 |
| L. Draisaitl | C | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:49 | 5:08 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:11 | 5:08 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 16:26 | 4:12 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 16:39 | 0:38 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15:21 | 0:37 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:11 | 0:39 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13:01 | 0:02 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 12:16 | 0:00 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12:02 | 0:07 |
| M. Jones | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:51 | 0:07 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8:37 | 0:07 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 23:38 | 5:08 |
| S. Stastney | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:07 | 0:07 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 19:12 | 0:39 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19:08 | 0:07 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 17:17 | 0:37 |
| A. Regula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 15:37 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Ingram | 19 | 18 | 1 | .947 | 60:00 | Win |
| C. Pickard | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
CGY
EDM
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | CGY 2.8, EDM 3.1 | CGY 1, EDM 5 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 6 |
| Shots on goal | CGY 28.4, EDM 29.3 | CGY 19, EDM 39 |
| Win chance | EDM 55% | EDM won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.3 | 6 | 1.55 | 5 | 38% | 0 |
| CGY N. Kadri | 3.1 | 2 | 0.82 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 3.0 | 6 | 0.84 | 3 | 38% | 1 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 2.9 | 4 | 1.37 | 3 | 43% | 3 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.7 | 2 | 0.93 | 2 | 16% | 0 |
| CGY B. Coleman | 2.3 | 1 | 0.53 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| CGY M. Coronato | 2.2 | 1 | 0.52 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 2.1 | 4 | 0.87 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| CGY M. Backlund | 2.1 | 4 | 0.49 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 2.1 | 3 | 0.60 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| CGY M. Weegar | 2.0 | 2 | 0.46 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.0 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| CGY R. Andersson | 2.0 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| CGY Y. Sharangovich | 1.9 | 2 | 0.54 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| CGY J. Farabee | 1.9 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.8 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| CGY M. Frost | 1.7 | 3 | 0.48 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| CGY J. Huberdeau | 1.7 | 1 | 0.70 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| CGY C. Zary | 1.6 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.6 | 2 | 0.42 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.4 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.4 | 3 | 0.32 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| CGY A. Klapka | 1.2 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| CGY H. Brzustewicz | 1.1 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 1.0 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM M. Jones | 1.0 | 3 | 0.18 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 1.0 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| CGY R. Lomberg | 0.9 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CGY K. Bahl | 0.9 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM S. Stastney | 0.9 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| CGY Y. Kuznetsov | 0.9 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM A. Regula | 0.8 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.8 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.7 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| CGY J. Beecher | 0.7 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CGY J. Hanley | 0.5 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.