Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CGY3
FinalFri, Oct 24, 2025Every game that night
WPG5

WPG beat CGY 5-3, with the chances close: 3.07 expected goals to 3.38. J. Morrissey led the way with 3 points (0 G, 3 A). J. Farabee had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.8. E. Comrie stopped 30 of 33.

Team Stats

CGYWPG
33Shots on goal32
3.38Expected goals3.07
63Shot attempts53
235v5 shots on goal17
1/6Power play2/8
16Hits19
10Blocked shots13
21Penalty minutes19
13Giveaways9
4Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CGY 3.38 xGWPG 3.07 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdCGY goal, 5:18WPG goal, 5:19WPG goal, 6:24WPG goal, 9:50CGY goal, 13:56WPG goal, 18:50CGY goal, 8:27

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CGY33 on goal, 3 scored
WPG30 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CGY Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. ColemanLW112320+2016:560:14
M. BacklundC112410+2015:420:32
N. KadriC101310-2020:394:58
S. HonzekLW011110+1013:270:16
M. FrostC0110100210:115:05
J. FarabeeLW000500-1019:373:10
J. HuberdeauLW000200-1219:294:20
Y. SharangovichC000110-2015:282:40
C. ZaryC000100-2013:182:34
M. CoronatoRW000400-1413:164:40
A. KlapkaRW000110077:400:49
R. LombergLW000030025:270:00
K. BahlD011111+1220:320:00
Z. ParekhD0110100017:024:35
M. WeegarD000021-2025:303:12
R. AnderssonD000302+1222:352:19
J. BeanD000215-1016:270:00
J. HanleyD0002010012:060:15
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Wolf31274.87158:29Loss
D. Cooley000–0:00

WPG Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. ScheifeleC0224000021:549:29
G. VilardiC112200-1018:568:36
K. ConnorLW1016100023:408:43
A. IafalloLW101200+1018:038:48
V. NamestnikovC101311+1015:441:48
J. ToewsC1011000012:061:40
N. NiederreiterRW0001310412:482:51
C. KoepkeLW0001300012:160:00
G. NyquistRW0001000012:112:31
M. BarronC0001110011:410:00
T. PearsonLW000031029:490:00
N. ChibrikovRW000121048:200:00
J. MorrisseyD033223+3026:137:54
D. DeMeloD011101+2219:590:12
L. StanleyD0111110512:210:13
N. PionkD000412-1024:373:19
H. FleuryD0001010218:280:21
C. MillerD000010-108:160:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Comrie33303.90960:00Win
C. Hellebuyck000–0:00

Lines at 5-on-5

CGY

Line 4M. Frost5:06R. Lomberg5:27A. Klapka6:09
Pair 1R. Andersson12:54K. Bahl13:12
Pair 2M. Weegar13:14J. Bean11:08
Pair 3J. Hanley9:02Z. Parekh11:23

WPG

Pair 1D. DeMelo13:37J. Morrissey13:00
Pair 2H. Fleury12:37N. Pionk13:08
Pair 3L. Stanley10:06C. Miller8:16

From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCGY 2.5, WPG 3.1CGY 3, WPG 5
Total goals5.68
Shots on goalCGY 26.9, WPG 27.9CGY 33, WPG 32
Win chanceWPG 59%WPG won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
WPG K. Connor3.361.07137%1
CGY N. Kadri3.130.76129%1
CGY M. Weegar2.200.53010%0
WPG M. Scheifele2.240.99235%0
CGY B. Coleman2.230.44221%1
CGY M. Coronato2.240.51022%0
WPG G. Vilardi2.120.76230%1
CGY R. Andersson2.030.3709%0
WPG J. Morrissey2.020.67312%0
CGY M. Backlund1.940.35215%1
CGY J. Farabee1.850.37017%0
CGY J. Huberdeau1.820.68022%0
WPG N. Niederreiter1.810.43020%0
WPG N. Pionk1.740.4006%0
WPG A. Iafallo1.620.40117%1
CGY M. Frost1.500.40115%0
WPG J. Toews1.510.49118%1
CGY C. Zary1.410.34015%0
CGY Y. Sharangovich1.410.38018%0
CGY Z. Parekh1.300.2116%0
WPG M. Barron1.310.26012%0
CGY A. Klapka1.310.29014%0
WPG T. Pearson1.200.28011%0
CGY S. Honzek1.210.1219%0
WPG G. Nyquist1.110.44015%0
WPG V. Namestnikov1.130.42114%1
WPG C. Miller1.100.2104%0
WPG N. Chibrikov1.110.30014%0
CGY J. Bean1.020.1504%0
CGY K. Bahl1.010.2013%0
WPG D. DeMelo1.010.2714%0
WPG C. Koepke1.010.19010%0
WPG H. Fleury0.910.1302%0
CGY R. Lomberg0.900.1407%0
WPG L. Stanley0.810.2013%0
CGY J. Hanley0.620.1303%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.