Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CHI4
FinalSat, Dec 21, 2024Every game that night
CGY6

CGY beat CHI 6-4, and the chances backed it up: 3.78 expected goals to 2.87. T. Bertuzzi led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). M. Coronato had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.2. D. Wolf stopped 24 of 28.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CHI0134
CGY2316
  1. 1st 12:19CGYJ. HuberdeauSH0.16 xG
  2. 1st 13:26CGYN. Kadri0.04 xG
  3. 2nd 10:09CHIC. Bedard0.14 xG
  4. 2nd 10:37CGYC. Zary0.13 xG
  5. 2nd 12:40CGYM. CoronatoPP0.14 xG
  6. 2nd 17:51CGYB. Coleman0.08 xG
  7. 3rd 0:57CHIT. Bertuzzi0.54 xG
  8. 3rd 11:30CHIT. BertuzziPP0.24 xG
  9. 3rd 18:52CHII. Mikheyev0.23 xG
  10. 3rd 19:37CGYM. BacklundEN0.90 xG

Team Stats

CHICGY
28Shots on goal30
2.87Expected goals3.78
54Shot attempts53
195v5 shots on goal21
1/3Power play1/5
12Hits27
14Blocked shots19
36Penalty minutes32
15Giveaways16
4Takeaways2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CHI 2.87 xGCGY 3.78 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdCGY goal, 12:19CGY goal, 13:26CHI goal, 10:09CGY goal, 10:37CGY goal, 12:40CGY goal, 17:51CHI goal, 0:57CHI goal, 11:30CHI goal, 18:52CGY goal, 19:37

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CHI28 on goal, 4 scored
CGY30 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. BedardC1233000223:582:18
T. BertuzziLW21332001417:392:27
T. TeravainenC022200-2019:232:23
T. HallLW022000+1015:171:37
N. FolignoLW011210-1218:220:13
I. MikheyevRW101500-1016:140:00
J. DickinsonC000212-2015:480:00
L. ReichelLW0000010012:441:38
F. NazarC000012-1212:402:16
R. DonatoC000200-11411:461:35
P. MaroonLW000020008:581:33
J. AndersonRW000201007:200:00
S. JonesD0000010026:422:28
A. VlasicD000410-1020:370:38
N. AllanD000021+1018:590:00
C. MurphyD000326-2018:260:00
K. KorchinskiD000000-1014:330:54
T. BrodieD0000000214:280:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
P. Mrazek29245.82857:29Loss
A. Soderblom000–0:00

CGY Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. CoronatoRW1126200021:414:16
B. ColemanLW1123120019:143:05
J. HuberdeauLW112211+1019:014:56
C. ZaryC112201+1014:194:33
M. BacklundC1016010420:563:30
N. KadriC101200+1016:563:24
Y. SharangovichC011010+1015:143:44
J. PelletierLW011010+1010:170:00
M. PospisilC00004101614:422:54
K. RooneyC0002200011:290:41
W. DuehrRW000020009:260:33
R. LombergLW000140008:410:31
M. WeegarD022132+2022:055:14
J. BeanD011101+1017:130:48
R. AnderssonD0003130025:593:25
K. BahlD000114-1221:551:01
J. HanleyD000003+1015:190:30
B. PachalD000040+11011:240:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Wolf28244.85760:00Win
D. Vladar000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCHI 2.6, CGY 3.3CHI 4, CGY 6
Total goals5.910
Shots on goalCHI 25.4, CGY 32.3CHI 28, CGY 30
Win chanceCGY 62%CGY won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CGY N. Kadri3.420.91132%1
CGY M. Backlund2.660.57120%1
CHI C. Bedard2.430.82323%1
CGY B. Coleman2.430.62227%1
CGY M. Coronato2.260.56222%1
CHI R. Donato2.220.54022%0
CHI S. Jones2.200.49010%0
CGY M. Weegar2.210.56212%0
CGY J. Huberdeau2.120.90226%1
CGY Y. Sharangovich2.000.57126%0
CHI T. Hall1.900.55221%0
CGY M. Pospisil1.900.49015%0
CGY R. Andersson1.830.53010%0
CHI T. Bertuzzi1.830.58323%2
CGY C. Zary1.720.56221%1
CHI I. Mikheyev1.650.40118%1
CHI T. Teravainen1.620.61221%0
CHI N. Foligno1.420.44117%0
CGY J. Pelletier1.400.33113%0
CHI A. Vlasic1.340.3305%0
CHI J. Dickinson1.220.38017%0
CHI C. Murphy1.130.2506%0
CHI L. Reichel1.100.29011%0
CGY B. Pachal1.100.1404%0
CGY K. Bahl1.110.2804%0
CGY J. Bean1.010.2516%0
CHI F. Nazar1.000.29015%0
CHI K. Korchinski1.000.1605%0
CGY W. Duehr0.900.25011%0
CGY K. Rooney0.920.1609%0
CHI P. Maroon0.800.2508%0
CGY R. Lomberg0.810.1509%0
CHI J. Anderson0.820.2109%0
CGY J. Hanley0.600.1303%0
CHI T. Brodie0.500.2403%0
CHI N. Allan0.500.2504%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.