CHI beat LAK 4-3 in a shootout despite fewer good chances: 1.70 expected goals to 3.56. LAK outshot CHI 40 to 21. A. Laferriere led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). B. Clarke had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.0. P. Mrazek stopped 37 of 40.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | SO | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| LAK | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
- 1st 3:57LAKA. LaferrierePP0.15 xG
- 2nd 18:37LAKA. Laferriere0.04 xG
- 3rd 3:26CHIN. Foligno0.07 xG
- 3rd 5:34CHIC. Smith0.07 xG
- 3rd 11:48LAKP. Danault0.17 xG
- 3rd 19:29CHIT. Bertuzzi0.19 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
CHI 1.70 xGLAK 3.56 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
CHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Donato | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:13 | 2:01 |
| T. Bertuzzi | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:18 | 1:59 |
| L. Reichel | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:45 | 1:36 |
| N. Foligno | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 5 | 15:15 | 0:00 |
| C. Smith | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 12:12 | 1:35 |
| C. Bedard | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21:54 | 2:03 |
| P. Kurashev | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:13 | 2:01 |
| T. Hall | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:40 | 1:58 |
| J. Dickinson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 16:53 | 0:23 |
| I. Mikheyev | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:52 | 0:05 |
| P. Maroon | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 13:06 | 1:49 |
| T. Teravainen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:18 | 0:07 |
| S. Jones | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 28:13 | 2:13 |
| A. Vlasic | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 27:07 | 1:25 |
| N. Allan | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:09 | 0:00 |
| C. Murphy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 23:09 | 0:23 |
| W. Kaiser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:39 | 0:22 |
| I. Phillips | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:13 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Mrazek | 40 | 37 | 3 | .925 | 63:28 | Win |
| A. Soderblom | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
LAK Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Fiala | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:49 | 3:53 |
| P. Danault | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 20:33 | 1:24 |
| A. Laferriere | RW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:23 | 3:55 |
| A. Kopitar | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 20:37 | 2:59 |
| T. Moore | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:32 | 0:28 |
| A. Turcotte | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:14 | 0:14 |
| A. Kempe | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 20:27 | 3:29 |
| Q. Byfield | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:45 | 0:41 |
| W. Foegele | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:16 | 0:00 |
| T. Lewis | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:40 | 0:00 |
| A. Thomas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:36 | 0:00 |
| T. Jeannot | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10:23 | 0:00 |
| V. Gavrikov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 24:29 | 0:02 |
| J. Edmundson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 24:10 | 0:28 |
| M. Anderson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 23:23 | 0:00 |
| B. Clarke | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 2 | 21:53 | 3:32 |
| J. Spence | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:50 | 0:50 |
| A. Englund | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7:30 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Kuemper | 21 | 18 | 3 | .857 | 63:30 | OT loss |
| D. Rittich | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | CHI 2.5, LAK 3.5 | CHI 4, LAK 3 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | CHI 24.8, LAK 32.7 | CHI 21, LAK 40 |
| Win chance | LAK 67% | CHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAK A. Kempe | 3.1 | 6 | 0.98 | 0 | 37% | 0 |
| LAK T. Moore | 2.8 | 1 | 0.64 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| CHI C. Bedard | 2.8 | 3 | 0.78 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| LAK K. Fiala | 2.6 | 4 | 0.90 | 2 | 30% | 0 |
| LAK W. Foegele | 2.6 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| CHI S. Jones | 2.3 | 0 | 0.49 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| LAK A. Laferriere | 2.1 | 3 | 0.47 | 2 | 22% | 2 |
| LAK Q. Byfield | 2.1 | 3 | 0.70 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| CHI T. Hall | 2.0 | 1 | 0.53 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| LAK P. Danault | 2.0 | 5 | 0.63 | 2 | 23% | 1 |
| CHI T. Teravainen | 2.0 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| LAK B. Clarke | 2.0 | 6 | 0.64 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CHI T. Bertuzzi | 1.9 | 2 | 0.53 | 1 | 22% | 1 |
| CHI N. Foligno | 1.8 | 1 | 0.44 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| LAK A. Thomas | 1.8 | 1 | 0.49 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| LAK A. Kopitar | 1.6 | 0 | 0.91 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| CHI I. Mikheyev | 1.6 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| CHI R. Donato | 1.6 | 5 | 0.37 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| CHI C. Smith | 1.6 | 2 | 0.32 | 1 | 15% | 1 |
| LAK V. Gavrikov | 1.4 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| LAK T. Lewis | 1.4 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| LAK J. Spence | 1.4 | 3 | 0.41 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI P. Kurashev | 1.3 | 1 | 0.45 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| LAK A. Turcotte | 1.3 | 1 | 0.31 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| LAK M. Anderson | 1.3 | 2 | 0.32 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI J. Dickinson | 1.3 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| LAK J. Edmundson | 1.2 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| CHI L. Reichel | 1.1 | 2 | 0.28 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| LAK T. Jeannot | 1.1 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| CHI C. Murphy | 1.0 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI A. Vlasic | 0.9 | 0 | 0.24 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CHI P. Maroon | 0.9 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| CHI I. Phillips | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| CHI W. Kaiser | 0.7 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| CHI N. Allan | 0.6 | 0 | 0.20 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| LAK A. Englund | 0.5 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.