CHI beat NYI 4-3 despite fewer good chances: 3.07 expected goals to 4.81. NYI outshot CHI 47 to 24. N. Lardis led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). B. Horvat had 9 shots on goal against our projection of 3.4. A. Soderblom stopped 44 of 47.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| NYI | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
- 1st 0:49NYIA. Lee0.10 xG
- 1st 12:46CHIN. Lardis0.29 xG
- 1st 18:06CHII. Mikheyev0.16 xG
- 1st 19:31CHIT. Bertuzzi0.47 xG
- 2nd 6:02CHIF. Nazar0.11 xG
- 3rd 8:45NYIS. Holmstrom0.15 xG
- 3rd 16:37NYIC. Ritchie0.06 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
CHI 3.07 xGNYI 4.81 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
CHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Lardis | LW | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 14:12 | 1:18 |
| T. Bertuzzi | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 19:15 | 2:30 |
| F. Nazar | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 16:43 | 2:27 |
| I. Mikheyev | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:33 | 0:00 |
| A. Frondell | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 15:43 | 2:29 |
| C. Bedard | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:53 | 2:28 |
| R. Greene | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 18:29 | 1:17 |
| R. Donato | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 15:51 | 0:15 |
| A. Burakovsky | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:09 | 1:23 |
| T. Teravainen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:12 | 1:30 |
| S. Lafferty | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:11 | 0:00 |
| L. Slaggert | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:39 | 0:00 |
| A. Vlasic | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 25:11 | 0:23 |
| A. Levshunov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 23:12 | 2:44 |
| L. Crevier | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:48 | 0:09 |
| W. Kaiser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:46 | 0:00 |
| S. Rinzel | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 17:20 | 1:07 |
| E. Del Mastro | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:26 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Soderblom | 47 | 44 | 3 | .936 | 60:00 | Win |
| S. Knight | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
NYI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Horvat | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:03 | 2:06 |
| M. Barzal | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:32 | 2:06 |
| A. Lee | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:39 | 0:48 |
| C. Ritchie | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:00 | 2:06 |
| S. Holmstrom | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:56 | 0:21 |
| B. Schenn | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:29 | 2:06 |
| E. Heineman | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17:27 | 0:21 |
| J. Pageau | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:04 | 0:21 |
| O. Palat | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:06 | 0:00 |
| C. Cizikas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:05 | 0:00 |
| K. MacLean | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 7:28 | 0:00 |
| M. Gatcomb | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 7:06 | 0:00 |
| M. Schaefer | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 31:59 | 2:06 |
| C. Soucy | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 20:11 | 0:00 |
| S. Mayfield | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 18:05 | 0:00 |
| A. Pelech | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 4 | 21:58 | 0:00 |
| A. Boqvist | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17:57 | 0:21 |
| T. DeAngelo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6:09 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Rittich | 12 | 9 | 3 | .750 | 20:00 | |
| I. Sorokin | 12 | 11 | 1 | .917 | 37:46 | Loss |
Lines at 5-on-5
CHI
NYI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | CHI 2.5, NYI 3.2 | CHI 4, NYI 3 |
| Total goals | 5.6 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | CHI 23.7, NYI 30.1 | CHI 24, NYI 47 |
| Win chance | NYI 62% | CHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI B. Horvat | 3.4 | 9 | 0.87 | 1 | 36% | 0 |
| CHI C. Bedard | 2.9 | 4 | 0.90 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| NYI A. Lee | 2.7 | 3 | 0.60 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| NYI M. Schaefer | 2.5 | 8 | 0.79 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| NYI M. Barzal | 2.4 | 5 | 0.93 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| NYI E. Heineman | 2.3 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NYI T. DeAngelo | 2.2 | 0 | 0.58 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| CHI F. Nazar | 2.1 | 1 | 0.61 | 2 | 21% | 1 |
| CHI T. Bertuzzi | 2.0 | 2 | 0.64 | 2 | 27% | 1 |
| CHI S. Rinzel | 1.7 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NYI B. Schenn | 1.6 | 2 | 0.59 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| CHI I. Mikheyev | 1.6 | 1 | 0.40 | 1 | 19% | 1 |
| CHI R. Greene | 1.6 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| NYI S. Holmstrom | 1.5 | 2 | 0.60 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| NYI A. Pelech | 1.4 | 5 | 0.31 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| CHI L. Crevier | 1.4 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| CHI R. Donato | 1.4 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| NYI C. Ritchie | 1.4 | 2 | 0.45 | 1 | 18% | 1 |
| CHI A. Burakovsky | 1.4 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| CHI T. Teravainen | 1.3 | 0 | 0.56 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| NYI J. Pageau | 1.3 | 2 | 0.51 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| CHI A. Levshunov | 1.3 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI N. Lardis | 1.1 | 1 | 0.26 | 3 | 14% | 1 |
| NYI C. Cizikas | 1.1 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| CHI A. Vlasic | 1.1 | 3 | 0.27 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CHI W. Kaiser | 1.1 | 2 | 0.22 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NYI O. Palat | 1.1 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| NYI M. Gatcomb | 1.0 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| NYI C. Soucy | 0.9 | 1 | 0.18 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| NYI K. MacLean | 0.8 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI S. Mayfield | 0.8 | 2 | 0.16 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| NYI A. Boqvist | 0.8 | 2 | 0.26 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CHI L. Slaggert | 0.8 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CHI E. Mastro | 0.6 | 2 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| CHI S. Lafferty | 0.6 | 1 | 0.12 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.