CHI beat SEA 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.73 expected goals to 2.37. I. Mikheyev led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). R. Donato had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. A. Soderblom stopped 25 of 27.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
- 2nd 9:15CHIT. TeravainenPP0.16 xG
- 2nd 19:37CHIT. Bertuzzi0.20 xG
- 3rd 10:48SEAJ. Schwartz0.18 xG
- 3rd 13:08CHIS. Boisvert0.25 xG
- 3rd 14:18SEAK. Kakko0.21 xG
- 3rd 18:48CHII. MikheyevEN0.39 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
CHI 3.73 xGSEA 2.37 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
CHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Bedard | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:41 | 3:36 |
| I. Mikheyev | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:14 | 0:00 |
| T. Teravainen | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20:48 | 4:12 |
| F. Nazar | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 18:57 | 4:12 |
| T. Bertuzzi | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:46 | 4:12 |
| L. Slaggert | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:58 | 0:00 |
| S. Boisvert | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:18 | 0:00 |
| A. Frondell | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 16:50 | 4:12 |
| R. Greene | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:17 | 1:11 |
| R. Donato | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:12 | 1:11 |
| N. Lardis | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:12 | 1:08 |
| A. Burakovsky | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 9:24 | 1:03 |
| W. Kaiser | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:41 | 0:08 |
| K. Korchinski | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 11:20 | 0:00 |
| A. Vlasic | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 22:27 | 0:03 |
| S. Rinzel | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 21:04 | 1:39 |
| L. Crevier | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20:09 | 0:08 |
| E. Del Mastro | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15:42 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Soderblom | 27 | 25 | 2 | .926 | 60:00 | Win |
| S. Knight | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
SEA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Schwartz | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:08 | 2:18 |
| M. Beniers | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:49 | 2:16 |
| K. Kakko | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:39 | 2:10 |
| E. Tolvanen | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:22 | 1:43 |
| B. Catton | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 11:59 | 0:00 |
| J. Eberle | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 18:57 | 1:46 |
| J. McCann | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 18:30 | 2:15 |
| C. Stephenson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:36 | 1:42 |
| B. McMann | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:57 | 1:47 |
| F. Gaudreau | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:05 | 0:00 |
| B. Meyers | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:26 | 0:00 |
| O. Fisker Molgaard | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:04 | 0:00 |
| B. Montour | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 25:03 | 2:28 |
| A. Larsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 2 | 22:02 | 0:00 |
| V. Dunn | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 19:25 | 1:35 |
| R. Lindgren | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 17:02 | 0:00 |
| R. Evans | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:51 | 0:00 |
| J. Oleksiak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 16:23 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Grubauer | 30 | 27 | 3 | .900 | 58:19 | Loss |
| M. Murray | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
CHI
SEA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | CHI 2.8, SEA 3.4 | CHI 4, SEA 2 |
| Total goals | 6.2 | 6 |
| Shots on goal | CHI 24.7, SEA 29.4 | CHI 31, SEA 27 |
| Win chance | SEA 61% | CHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI C. Bedard | 2.9 | 2 | 0.94 | 2 | 29% | 0 |
| SEA B. Montour | 2.6 | 4 | 0.56 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| SEA B. McMann | 2.6 | 4 | 0.68 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| SEA J. McCann | 2.3 | 0 | 0.76 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| CHI A. Frondell | 2.2 | 1 | 0.74 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| SEA J. Eberle | 2.1 | 1 | 0.74 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| CHI F. Nazar | 2.1 | 1 | 0.64 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| CHI T. Bertuzzi | 2.0 | 3 | 0.72 | 1 | 29% | 1 |
| SEA V. Dunn | 2.0 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| SEA M. Beniers | 2.0 | 1 | 0.64 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| SEA E. Tolvanen | 1.7 | 0 | 0.45 | 1 | 19% | 0 |
| SEA J. Schwartz | 1.7 | 1 | 0.46 | 2 | 20% | 1 |
| CHI S. Rinzel | 1.7 | 2 | 0.31 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI I. Mikheyev | 1.7 | 2 | 0.46 | 2 | 21% | 1 |
| CHI L. Crevier | 1.5 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| SEA B. Catton | 1.5 | 3 | 0.34 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| CHI N. Lardis | 1.4 | 3 | 0.40 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| CHI R. Greene | 1.4 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| CHI R. Donato | 1.4 | 6 | 0.43 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| SEA K. Kakko | 1.3 | 1 | 0.53 | 1 | 18% | 1 |
| SEA C. Stephenson | 1.2 | 0 | 0.71 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| SEA A. Larsson | 1.2 | 4 | 0.32 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| SEA F. Gaudreau | 1.2 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| CHI T. Teravainen | 1.1 | 4 | 0.54 | 1 | 19% | 1 |
| CHI W. Kaiser | 1.1 | 1 | 0.21 | 2 | 6% | 0 |
| SEA B. Meyers | 1.1 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| CHI A. Vlasic | 1.1 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| CHI A. Burakovsky | 1.1 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| SEA O. Molgaard | 0.9 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| CHI L. Slaggert | 0.9 | 2 | 0.15 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| SEA R. Evans | 0.8 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| CHI K. Korchinski | 0.8 | 0 | 0.12 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CHI E. Mastro | 0.8 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| SEA J. Oleksiak | 0.7 | 3 | 0.18 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| SEA R. Lindgren | 0.7 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 16 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.