Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CHI2
FinalSat, Mar 15, 2025Every game that night
VAN6

VAN beat CHI 6-2, with the chances close: 1.88 expected goals to 1.37. C. Garland led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). A. Silovs stopped 17 of 19.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CHI0112
VAN2136
  1. 1st 17:46VANQ. Hughes0.06 xG
  2. 1st 18:21VANT. Myers0.05 xG
  3. 2nd 8:08VANC. Garland0.22 xG
  4. 2nd 18:51CHIA. Vlasic0.03 xG
  5. 3rd 4:01VANE. Pettersson0.44 xG
  6. 3rd 5:22CHIW. Kaiser0.06 xG
  7. 3rd 9:50VANN. Aman0.10 xG
  8. 3rd 9:58VANP. Suter0.24 xG

Team Stats

CHIVAN
19Shots on goal15
1.37Expected goals1.88
54Shot attempts48
185v5 shots on goal15
0/3Power play0/2
25Hits29
19Blocked shots18
26Penalty minutes26
12Giveaways16
3Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CHI 1.37 xGVAN 1.88 xGGoal

00.511.521st2nd3rdVAN goal, 17:46VAN goal, 18:21VAN goal, 8:08CHI goal, 18:51VAN goal, 4:01CHI goal, 5:22VAN goal, 9:50VAN goal, 9:58

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CHI17 on goal, 2 scored
VAN15 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
R. DonatoC022201-1018:312:01
T. TeravainenC011030-1015:542:01
C. BedardC000210-21418:362:01
F. NazarC000000-11017:141:55
I. MikheyevRW000210-1016:261:56
N. FolignoLW000030-1016:170:05
J. DickinsonC0001620015:420:09
L. SlaggertLW000011-1015:310:00
C. DachC000150-2014:542:05
T. BertuzziLW000110-1012:342:01
L. ReichelLW000100-109:322:00
J. VelenoC000021-108:340:00
A. LevshunovD011204-2022:392:01
A. VlasicD101304-2021:122:05
W. KaiserD1012010019:460:00
C. MurphyD000112+2219:030:10
A. MartinezD000001-3017:420:00
L. CrevierD000112-3015:530:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Soderblom1596.60060:00Loss
S. Knight000–0:00

VAN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. SherwoodLW022160+2017:580:31
T. BluegerC022011+2016:380:00
E. PetterssonC112121+2016:011:41
P. SuterC112121+1014:520:27
C. GarlandRW112301+21214:261:22
N. HoglanderLW022121+2013:180:00
N. AmanC101121+1013:590:00
D. JoshuaC011143+1011:080:00
B. BoeserRW000110-1015:221:39
J. DeBruskLW000000+1015:181:33
D. O'ConnorLW000031+1014:020:00
F. ChytilC000200-1012:010:25
Q. HughesD101101+2022:571:38
F. HronekD011000+11021:580:44
T. MyersD101202+2220:210:30
M. PetterssonD000003+1019:450:00
D. ForbortD000031+1017:280:00
V. ManciniD000031+1216:280:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Silovs19172.89560:00Win
K. Lankinen000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • HometownConnor Bedard CHI Plays near home (born in North Vancouver)2 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCHI 2.4, VAN 3.4CHI 2, VAN 6
Total goals5.88
Shots on goalCHI 22.3, VAN 29.8CHI 19, VAN 15
Win chanceVAN 66%VAN won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
VAN F. Chytil2.620.59024%0
VAN C. Garland2.430.71226%1
VAN Q. Hughes2.411.14114%1
VAN B. Boeser2.310.86034%0
CHI C. Bedard2.320.77023%0
CHI R. Donato2.320.68224%0
VAN J. DeBrusk2.200.66031%0
VAN E. Pettersson2.110.93232%1
VAN K. Sherwood1.810.48221%0
VAN P. Suter1.810.52223%1
VAN F. Hronek1.600.6319%0
CHI I. Mikheyev1.620.43019%0
VAN D. O'Connor1.600.37016%0
VAN N. Hoglander1.610.43220%0
CHI F. Nazar1.600.45017%0
CHI T. Teravainen1.500.72122%0
CHI T. Bertuzzi1.410.48019%0
CHI N. Foligno1.200.38014%0
VAN T. Myers1.220.3615%1
VAN V. Mancini1.200.3205%0
VAN T. Blueger1.200.33211%0
CHI C. Murphy1.110.2306%0
VAN M. Pettersson1.100.3905%0
CHI L. Slaggert1.100.24011%0
CHI C. Dach1.110.33012%0
VAN D. Joshua1.110.40119%0
CHI A. Vlasic1.030.2815%1
CHI W. Kaiser1.020.1915%1
CHI J. Dickinson1.010.30014%0
CHI L. Reichel0.910.27010%0
CHI J. Veleno0.800.22010%0
CHI L. Crevier0.810.1406%0
CHI A. Martinez0.800.2107%0
VAN D. Forbort0.700.1904%0
VAN N. Aman0.710.2118%1

Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.