Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
COL4
FinalThu, Feb 6, 2025Every game that night
CGY2

COL beat CGY 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.83 expected goals to 2.32. M. Necas led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). C. Makar had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 2.8. M. Blackwood stopped 27 of 29.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
COL0314
CGY1012
  1. 1st 3:22CGYJ. HuberdeauPP0.17 xG
  2. 2nd 1:20COLC. Makar0.04 xG
  3. 2nd 5:34COLA. Lehkonen0.72 xG
  4. 2nd 19:42COLM. NecasPP0.09 xG
  5. 3rd 12:53COLM. Necas0.23 xG
  6. 3rd 18:14CGYR. Andersson0.01 xG

Team Stats

COLCGY
34Shots on goal29
3.83Expected goals2.32
67Shot attempts48
265v5 shots on goal19
1/3Power play1/5
13Hits22
11Blocked shots18
15Penalty minutes11
17Giveaways19
11Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

COL 3.83 xGCGY 2.32 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdCGY goal, 3:22COL goal, 1:20COL goal, 5:34COL goal, 19:42COL goal, 12:53CGY goal, 18:14

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

COL33 on goal, 4 scored
CGY27 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

COL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. NecasC213820+3024:154:38
N. MacKinnonC033200+2222:474:32
A. LehkonenLW101511+3024:314:22
P. KellyC0113210012:210:00
J. DrouinLW0001000014:044:20
L. O'ConnorRW000101-1013:170:00
J. DruryC0001110213:110:32
C. MittelstadtC0001000011:500:49
J. KivirantaLW000010-1011:280:00
R. ColtonC000200009:480:47
J. ParssinenC000010008:470:00
M. WoodLW000010078:230:00
C. MakarD112800+2026:434:41
D. ToewsD011010+1022:390:28
S. MalinskiD011124+2019:050:00
S. GirardD000101+1219:360:36
C. de HaanD000010-1214:190:00
O. KylingtonD000002-1013:270:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
M. Blackwood29272.93160:00Win
T. Miner000–0:00

CGY Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. HuberdeauLW1015000024:445:23
N. KadriC0114010022:535:47
M. CoronatoRW011102-2020:115:22
M. PospisilC011450+1013:090:00
M. FrostC000100-1217:145:21
Y. SharangovichC000010-1015:523:00
M. BacklundC000001-1215:433:02
B. ColemanLW000320-1015:173:21
J. FarabeeLW000100-1013:062:54
K. RooneyC000023009:310:11
R. LombergLW000200009:210:00
A. KlapkaRW000141057:170:25
R. AnderssonD101201-1025:053:23
M. WeegarD0113120024:015:37
J. HanleyD000032-2019:250:00
B. PachalD0000110015:170:00
D. MiromanovD000023-1015:091:09
J. BeanD0002110213:230:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Wolf34304.88258:13Loss
D. Vladar000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamNazem Kadri COL Faces CGY, his team until Mar 20261 A, 4 SOG
  • HometownCale Makar COL Plays in his hometown1 G, 1 A, 8 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCOL 3.0, CGY 2.7COL 4, CGY 2
Total goals5.86
Shots on goalCOL 28.7, CGY 28.5COL 34, CGY 29
Win chanceCOL 55%COL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
COL N. MacKinnon4.121.41338%0
CGY N. Kadri3.540.90131%0
COL M. Necas2.980.93328%2
COL C. Makar2.880.99222%1
CGY B. Coleman2.630.63026%0
CGY M. Coronato2.510.59122%0
CGY M. Backlund2.300.49019%0
CGY M. Weegar2.230.57112%0
COL A. Lehkonen2.250.73131%1
CGY J. Huberdeau2.150.85125%1
COL D. Toews2.100.57111%0
CGY J. Farabee2.010.47019%0
CGY M. Frost1.910.55019%0
CGY Y. Sharangovich1.900.56024%0
CGY R. Andersson1.720.4119%1
COL R. Colton1.720.42020%0
COL M. Wood1.700.25012%0
COL J. Drury1.510.30010%0
COL J. Drouin1.510.70017%0
CGY M. Pospisil1.440.34110%0
COL S. Girard1.310.3305%0
COL L. O'Connor1.310.31013%0
CGY D. Miromanov1.200.2206%0
COL C. Mittelstadt1.210.51015%0
CGY J. Bean1.120.2406%0
COL P. Kelly1.130.22110%0
COL S. Malinski1.110.1514%0
CGY A. Klapka1.110.16010%0
COL O. Kylington1.000.2306%0
COL J. Kiviranta1.000.23011%0
COL C. Haan0.900.1603%0
CGY B. Pachal0.800.1303%0
CGY R. Lomberg0.820.1207%0
CGY J. Hanley0.700.1603%0
COL J. Parssinen0.700.27011%0
CGY K. Rooney0.600.1006%0

Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.