EDM beat DET 4-1, and the chances backed it up: 4.41 expected goals to 3.27. C. McDavid led the way with 4 points (0 G, 4 A). Z. Hyman had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 2.9. S. Skinner stopped 27 of 28.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| EDM | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
- 1st 14:25EDMZ. HymanPP0.19 xG
- 2nd 2:46EDMM. Ekholm0.04 xG
- 2nd 5:41DETS. Edvinsson0.20 xG
- 2nd 17:48EDMZ. Hyman0.25 xG
- 3rd 18:43EDMZ. HymanEN0.92 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
DET 3.27 xGEDM 4.41 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
DET Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Danielson | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:41 | 1:40 |
| E. Soderblom | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:07 | 0:00 |
| L. Raymond | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:19 | 2:20 |
| D. Larkin | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:36 | 2:20 |
| A. DeBrincat | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 19:15 | 2:21 |
| A. Copp | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:50 | 1:37 |
| E. Finnie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:44 | 1:40 |
| P. Kane | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 17:33 | 2:23 |
| M. Rasmussen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:55 | 1:39 |
| J. Compher | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:26 | 0:00 |
| J. Berggren | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:10 | 0:00 |
| M. Kasper | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:55 | 0:00 |
| S. Edvinsson | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 21:38 | 0:00 |
| M. Seider | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 22:49 | 2:19 |
| B. Chiarot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20:12 | 0:00 |
| A. Sandin-Pellikka | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:02 | 1:41 |
| A. Johansson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:54 | 0:00 |
| T. Hamonic | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 13:36 | 0:00 |
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 20:08 | 2:55 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 19:30 | 3:01 |
| L. Draisaitl | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 21:00 | 2:58 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:18 | 2:39 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:22 | 0:00 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15:47 | 0:00 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 14:47 | 0:00 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:03 | 0:06 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 10:36 | 0:00 |
| C. Lazar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:46 | 0:00 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 9:15 | 0:03 |
| D. Tomasek | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:33 | 0:00 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 21:57 | 0:00 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 2 | 20:29 | 0:22 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 24:34 | 3:01 |
| A. Regula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:36 | 0:00 |
| B. Kulak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 16:45 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 16:34 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Skinner | 28 | 27 | 1 | .964 | 60:00 | Win |
| C. Pickard | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
DET
EDM
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | DET 2.9, EDM 3.5 | DET 1, EDM 4 |
| Total goals | 6.4 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | DET 26.8, EDM 30.1 | DET 28, EDM 29 |
| Win chance | EDM 60% | EDM won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.1 | 4 | 1.62 | 4 | 40% | 0 |
| DET A. DeBrincat | 2.9 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 2.9 | 7 | 0.87 | 3 | 39% | 3 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.8 | 1 | 1.06 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 2.8 | 1 | 1.43 | 2 | 46% | 0 |
| DET D. Larkin | 2.7 | 3 | 0.86 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| DET P. Kane | 2.3 | 2 | 0.72 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| DET L. Raymond | 2.2 | 2 | 0.84 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.1 | 4 | 0.42 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 2.0 | 2 | 0.54 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 1.9 | 1 | 0.86 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| DET M. Seider | 1.8 | 4 | 0.49 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| DET E. Finnie | 1.7 | 3 | 0.37 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.6 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.6 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.5 | 1 | 0.43 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| DET M. Kasper | 1.3 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DET A. Copp | 1.3 | 1 | 0.43 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| DET N. Danielson | 1.3 | 0 | 0.27 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| DET E. Soderblom | 1.2 | 2 | 0.26 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| DET M. Rasmussen | 1.2 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| EDM B. Kulak | 1.2 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| DET B. Chiarot | 1.2 | 3 | 0.21 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 1.1 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| DET J. Compher | 1.1 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| EDM D. Tomasek | 1.0 | 3 | 0.24 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| DET J. Berggren | 1.0 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 1.0 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| DET S. Edvinsson | 1.0 | 1 | 0.30 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| EDM A. Regula | 0.9 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| DET T. Hamonic | 0.9 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.9 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.8 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| DET A. Sandin-Pellikka | 0.8 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM C. Lazar | 0.7 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| DET A. Johansson | 0.6 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.