DET beat VAN 4-0 despite fewer good chances: 2.84 expected goals to 4.23. VAN outshot DET 39 to 21. A. Sandin-Pellikka led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). J. van Riemsdyk had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.5. J. Gibson stopped 39 of 39.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| VAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- 1st 14:14DETJ. van Riemsdyk0.16 xG
- 2nd 15:15DETA. Copp0.09 xG
- 2nd 15:52DETN. Danielson0.12 xG
- 3rd 15:29DETD. LarkinEN0.64 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
DET 2.84 xGVAN 4.23 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
DET Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Copp | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 17:58 | 1:00 |
| L. Raymond | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:47 | 0:51 |
| D. Larkin | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:39 | 1:00 |
| A. DeBrincat | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:59 | 0:59 |
| J. Compher | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 15:12 | 0:00 |
| M. Rasmussen | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 14:10 | 0:36 |
| J. van Riemsdyk | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 13:18 | 0:50 |
| M. Kasper | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 10:54 | 0:36 |
| N. Danielson | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 10:11 | 1:09 |
| E. Finnie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:18 | 0:40 |
| P. Kane | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:38 | 1:20 |
| E. Soderblom | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:59 | 0:36 |
| A. Sandin-Pellikka | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 14:06 | 0:34 |
| M. Seider | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 27:05 | 1:53 |
| S. Edvinsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 23:46 | 0:36 |
| B. Chiarot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | +3 | 0 | 22:50 | 0:11 |
| J. Bernard-Docker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16:36 | 0:09 |
| A. Johansson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:00 | 0:00 |
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 20:30 | 3:56 |
| B. Boeser | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:09 | 3:56 |
| D. Kampf | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:15 | 0:00 |
| K. Sherwood | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 17:06 | 3:28 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:35 | 3:56 |
| E. Kane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 14:21 | 0:04 |
| D. O'Connor | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:15 | 0:00 |
| A. Räty | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:58 | 0:28 |
| N. Hoglander | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:22 | 0:00 |
| L. Karlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 12:10 | 0:14 |
| M. Sasson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12:00 | 0:14 |
| A. Bains | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:00 | 0:10 |
| Q. Hughes | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 25:46 | 3:56 |
| F. Hronek | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 22:32 | 0:04 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:36 | 0:10 |
| M. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 17:20 | 0:14 |
| E. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:00 | 0:00 |
| T. Willander | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:00 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Lankinen | 14 | 11 | 3 | .786 | 39:53 | Loss |
| N. Tolopilo | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1.000 | 19:12 |
Lines at 5-on-5
DET
VAN
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | DET 3.2, VAN 3.1 | DET 4, VAN 0 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 4 |
| Shots on goal | DET 28.8, VAN 26.3 | DET 21, VAN 39 |
| Win chance | DET 51% | DET won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET A. DeBrincat | 3.2 | 1 | 0.91 | 1 | 32% | 0 |
| DET D. Larkin | 2.9 | 1 | 0.98 | 1 | 33% | 1 |
| VAN Q. Hughes | 2.8 | 4 | 1.20 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.6 | 2 | 0.79 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| DET P. Kane | 2.4 | 4 | 0.82 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| VAN E. Kane | 2.4 | 2 | 0.60 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.4 | 5 | 0.65 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 2.4 | 3 | 0.84 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| DET L. Raymond | 2.3 | 1 | 0.96 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 2.0 | 5 | 0.61 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| DET M. Seider | 2.0 | 1 | 0.57 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| DET E. Finnie | 1.6 | 1 | 0.42 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| VAN L. Karlsson | 1.5 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| VAN N. Hoglander | 1.5 | 1 | 0.49 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| DET J. Riemsdyk | 1.5 | 5 | 0.45 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| VAN F. Hronek | 1.4 | 2 | 0.58 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| DET M. Kasper | 1.4 | 2 | 0.29 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| DET N. Danielson | 1.3 | 1 | 0.26 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| DET B. Chiarot | 1.3 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| DET S. Edvinsson | 1.2 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| DET A. Copp | 1.2 | 3 | 0.42 | 1 | 14% | 1 |
| DET E. Soderblom | 1.2 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DET M. Rasmussen | 1.2 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN D. O'Connor | 1.2 | 3 | 0.34 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.2 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| DET J. Compher | 1.2 | 0 | 0.37 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN M. Sasson | 1.1 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| VAN D. Kampf | 1.0 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| VAN A. Räty | 1.0 | 4 | 0.38 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| DET A. Sandin-Pellikka | 1.0 | 0 | 0.25 | 2 | 6% | 0 |
| DET J. Bernard-Docker | 0.9 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN M. Pettersson | 0.9 | 2 | 0.35 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| VAN T. Willander | 0.8 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| DET A. Johansson | 0.7 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 0.6 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN A. Bains | 0.5 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.