CGY beat EDM 3-2, with the chances close: 3.21 expected goals to 3.01. E. Bouchard led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). C. McDavid had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 3.1. D. Wolf stopped 29 of 31.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| CGY | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
- 1st 7:00CGYY. Sharangovich0.12 xG
- 1st 8:36EDME. BouchardPP0.07 xG
- 2nd 3:28CGYR. Lomberg0.27 xG
- 3rd 12:31CGYB. Coleman0.17 xG
- 3rd 15:23EDMC. McDavid0.07 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
EDM 3.01 xGCGY 3.21 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 26:39 | 5:13 |
| L. Draisaitl | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 24:23 | 4:50 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 23:04 | 4:48 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20:10 | 4:48 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:14 | 0:00 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:04 | 0:08 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:54 | 0:36 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:34 | 0:38 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10:29 | 0:00 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 8:46 | 0:00 |
| M. Jones | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 7:36 | 0:00 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 7:15 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 29:04 | 5:00 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22:46 | 0:27 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:35 | 0:32 |
| S. Stastney | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:21 | 0:00 |
| A. Regula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 13:06 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 12:34 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Ingram | 32 | 29 | 3 | .906 | 58:26 | Loss |
| C. Pickard | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
CGY Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y. Sharangovich | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 21:43 | 2:43 |
| B. Coleman | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20:34 | 2:33 |
| M. Backlund | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19:27 | 0:00 |
| A. Klapka | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | +3 | 2 | 10:49 | 0:00 |
| R. Lomberg | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 7:28 | 0:00 |
| N. Kadri | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:55 | 2:49 |
| J. Huberdeau | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 17:39 | 2:49 |
| J. Farabee | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:52 | 1:12 |
| M. Coronato | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:10 | 1:10 |
| M. Frost | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:49 | 1:17 |
| C. Zary | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:55 | 0:00 |
| J. Kirkland | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 8:53 | 0:00 |
| K. Bahl | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | -1 | 2 | 22:41 | 0:16 |
| R. Andersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 26:21 | 2:58 |
| M. Weegar | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +2 | 0 | 22:12 | 1:02 |
| Y. Kuznetsov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +2 | 4 | 21:35 | 0:00 |
| J. Hanley | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 13:29 | 0:00 |
| H. Brzustewicz | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:04 | 1:11 |
Lines at 5-on-5
EDM
CGY
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | EDM 3.1, CGY 2.9 | EDM 2, CGY 3 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | EDM 28.4, CGY 29.3 | EDM 31, CGY 32 |
| Win chance | EDM 52% | CGY won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.1 | 7 | 1.46 | 1 | 36% | 1 |
| CGY N. Kadri | 3.1 | 3 | 0.85 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 2.9 | 6 | 0.79 | 1 | 36% | 0 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 2.8 | 2 | 1.27 | 1 | 40% | 0 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.5 | 4 | 0.86 | 2 | 15% | 1 |
| CGY B. Coleman | 2.3 | 3 | 0.54 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| CGY M. Coronato | 2.3 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| CGY M. Backlund | 2.2 | 6 | 0.52 | 1 | 19% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 2.0 | 3 | 0.80 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| CGY R. Andersson | 2.0 | 1 | 0.51 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 2.0 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| CGY J. Farabee | 1.9 | 4 | 0.44 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| CGY Y. Sharangovich | 1.9 | 4 | 0.54 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 1.8 | 4 | 0.34 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| CGY M. Weegar | 1.8 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| CGY M. Frost | 1.8 | 2 | 0.51 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| CGY J. Huberdeau | 1.7 | 1 | 0.75 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.7 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| CGY C. Zary | 1.6 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.5 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.4 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.4 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| CGY A. Klapka | 1.2 | 3 | 0.30 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| CGY H. Brzustewicz | 1.1 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM M. Jones | 1.0 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CGY R. Lomberg | 1.0 | 2 | 0.16 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 1.0 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 1.0 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| CGY K. Bahl | 0.9 | 0 | 0.21 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| EDM S. Stastney | 0.9 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| CGY Y. Kuznetsov | 0.9 | 2 | 0.26 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM A. Regula | 0.8 | 1 | 0.12 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.8 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.7 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| CGY J. Kirkland | 0.6 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| CGY J. Hanley | 0.6 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.