Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
EDM4
FinalSat, Jan 11, 2025Every game that night
CHI3

EDM beat CHI 4-3, and the chances backed it up: 4.35 expected goals to 2.06. EDM outshot CHI 34 to 22. N. Foligno led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). L. Crevier had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 0.8. C. Pickard stopped 19 of 22.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
EDM0314
CHI2103
  1. 1st 4:45CHIT. Teravainen0.11 xG
  2. 1st 15:01CHIN. Foligno0.10 xG
  3. 2nd 0:22EDMV. Podkolzin0.25 xG
  4. 2nd 10:03CHIR. Donato0.17 xG
  5. 2nd 15:49EDMA. Henrique0.07 xG
  6. 2nd 17:30EDMC. Perry0.15 xG
  7. 3rd 7:18EDMZ. HymanPP0.22 xG

Team Stats

EDMCHI
34Shots on goal22
4.35Expected goals2.06
63Shot attempts44
315v5 shots on goal18
1/1Power play0/1
18Hits27
13Blocked shots11
4Penalty minutes4
12Giveaways9
6Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

EDM 4.35 xGCHI 2.06 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdCHI goal, 4:45CHI goal, 15:01EDM goal, 0:22CHI goal, 10:03EDM goal, 15:49EDM goal, 17:30EDM goal, 7:18

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

EDM34 on goal, 4 scored
CHI21 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
L. DraisaitlC022101+2021:381:00
V. PodkolzinRW112322+2014:340:00
Z. HymanLW101430-2019:061:00
V. ArvidssonLW011300+1216:160:00
A. HenriqueC1011010212:130:00
C. PerryRW101300+1011:280:00
K. KapanenRW011010+1010:220:00
C. McDavidC000120-2021:501:00
R. Nugent-HopkinsC000412-2019:171:00
M. JanmarkC0000200012:330:00
C. BrownRW000100-1011:070:00
D. RyanC000010008:000:00
E. BouchardD0114210023:421:00
T. EmbersonD0112020015:360:00
M. EkholmD0000120021:580:00
D. NurseD0002210021:240:00
B. KulakD000410-2019:330:00
T. StecherD000101+2016:470:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Pickard22193.86459:43Win
S. Skinner000–0:00

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. FolignoLW112470+2018:490:53
T. TeravainenC112110+2017:480:53
J. DickinsonC011201+2017:200:00
R. DonatoC1014100015:220:53
T. HallLW0112010012:170:00
C. BedardC000000-2021:240:53
T. BertuzziLW000100-2019:060:53
I. MikheyevRW000100-2018:090:00
P. MaroonLW0001100012:540:00
F. NazarC0000220011:060:00
C. DachC000051009:080:00
L. ReichelLW000000007:590:00
A. MartinezD011131-1018:560:00
N. AllanD0111210214:000:00
A. VlasicD000010+1024:540:00
S. JonesD000020-1023:090:53
L. CrevierD000423+1220:480:00
T. BrodieD0000010016:030:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Soderblom34304.88257:48Loss
P. Mrazek000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamJason Dickinson EDM First game back in Chicago, his team until Mar 20261 A, 2 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreEDM 4.0, CHI 2.3EDM 4, CHI 3
Total goals6.37
Shots on goalEDM 33.2, CHI 23.9EDM 34, CHI 22
Win chanceEDM 74%EDM won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM C. McDavid3.411.83043%0
EDM L. Draisaitl3.211.55248%0
EDM Z. Hyman3.140.88140%1
EDM E. Bouchard2.640.95116%0
EDM V. Arvidsson2.630.66123%0
EDM D. Nurse2.320.47010%0
CHI C. Bedard2.300.77023%0
EDM M. Ekholm2.100.55012%0
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins2.040.85026%0
CHI R. Donato2.040.42118%1
CHI S. Jones1.900.4309%0
CHI T. Bertuzzi1.810.55024%0
CHI T. Hall1.720.50119%0
CHI I. Mikheyev1.710.38019%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.630.34214%1
EDM B. Kulak1.540.3707%0
EDM A. Henrique1.410.48122%1
CHI N. Foligno1.440.41217%1
CHI T. Teravainen1.410.53219%1
EDM C. Brown1.410.40012%0
CHI J. Dickinson1.320.35117%0
CHI A. Vlasic1.200.2704%0
CHI L. Reichel1.100.26010%0
EDM K. Kapanen1.100.30112%0
EDM C. Perry1.130.35116%1
CHI F. Nazar1.000.26013%0
CHI A. Martinez1.010.2215%0
EDM M. Janmark0.900.33011%0
CHI P. Maroon0.810.2208%0
EDM T. Stecher0.810.1604%0
CHI L. Crevier0.840.1304%0
EDM T. Emberson0.820.2112%0
EDM D. Ryan0.700.1809%0
CHI T. Brodie0.500.2103%0
CHI N. Allan0.410.1914%0

Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.