MTL beat EDM 4-1, with the chances close: 3.87 expected goals to 3.82. J. Slafkovský led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). A. Texier had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. J. Dobes stopped 27 of 28.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MTL | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
- 2nd 2:28MTLI. DemidovPP0.12 xG
- 2nd 11:58MTLJ. Veleno0.03 xG
- 3rd 3:38MTLN. SuzukiPP0.42 xG
- 3rd 12:29EDMZ. HymanPP0.48 xG
- 3rd 13:52MTLA. Texier0.09 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
EDM 3.82 xGMTL 3.87 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 25:52 | 5:59 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 24:52 | 6:01 |
| L. Draisaitl | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 25:55 | 6:01 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23:27 | 5:59 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:43 | 0:00 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 13:11 | 0:25 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:37 | 0:27 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:51 | 0:00 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:02 | 0:27 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 9:35 | 0:00 |
| C. Lazar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:46 | 0:00 |
| M. Jones | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5:39 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 29:49 | 6:11 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 24:26 | 0:25 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:09 | 0:15 |
| A. Regula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 4 | 14:10 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:41 | 0:00 |
| S. Stastney | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:36 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Pickard | 27 | 23 | 4 | .852 | 55:37 | Loss |
| T. Jarry | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
MTL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Slafkovský | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16:28 | 3:25 |
| N. Suzuki | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19:41 | 3:25 |
| A. Texier | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 14:17 | 1:31 |
| J. Veleno | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 13:58 | 0:00 |
| I. Demidov | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13:16 | 3:31 |
| J. Evans | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:49 | 0:13 |
| J. Anderson | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 15:28 | 0:13 |
| C. Caufield | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:38 | 3:20 |
| O. Kapanen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 14:33 | 1:11 |
| Z. Bolduc | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:33 | 1:29 |
| B. Gallagher | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 12:43 | 1:32 |
| O. Beck | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:19 | 0:00 |
| L. Hutson | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21:17 | 3:43 |
| J. Struble | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 13:24 | 0:00 |
| M. Matheson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 26:05 | 0:18 |
| A. Carrier | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 22:40 | 0:00 |
| N. Dobson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19:16 | 1:19 |
| A. Engstrom | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:36 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Dobes | 28 | 27 | 1 | .964 | 59:33 | Win |
| S. Montembeault | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
EDM
MTL
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | EDM 3.3, MTL 3.0 | EDM 1, MTL 4 |
| Total goals | 6.2 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | EDM 28.4, MTL 25.3 | EDM 28, MTL 27 |
| Win chance | EDM 55% | MTL won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTL C. Caufield | 3.0 | 4 | 0.88 | 0 | 35% | 0 |
| EDM C. McDavid | 2.9 | 3 | 1.49 | 1 | 37% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 2.8 | 2 | 0.81 | 1 | 37% | 1 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 2.7 | 4 | 1.34 | 0 | 43% | 0 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.6 | 6 | 0.94 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| MTL N. Suzuki | 2.2 | 2 | 1.01 | 1 | 28% | 1 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.1 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| MTL J. Slafkovský | 1.9 | 3 | 0.62 | 2 | 22% | 0 |
| MTL N. Dobson | 1.9 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.8 | 2 | 0.46 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 1.8 | 1 | 0.79 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| MTL O. Kapanen | 1.8 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| MTL Z. Bolduc | 1.7 | 2 | 0.49 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.6 | 2 | 0.36 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.6 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| MTL B. Gallagher | 1.5 | 4 | 0.37 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| MTL M. Matheson | 1.5 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.4 | 2 | 0.37 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| MTL J. Anderson | 1.3 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| MTL A. Texier | 1.3 | 5 | 0.39 | 1 | 16% | 1 |
| MTL L. Hutson | 1.3 | 1 | 0.76 | 2 | 8% | 0 |
| MTL I. Demidov | 1.3 | 2 | 0.67 | 1 | 16% | 1 |
| EDM M. Jones | 1.1 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 1.1 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| MTL J. Veleno | 1.1 | 1 | 0.24 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 1.0 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| MTL J. Evans | 1.0 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM A. Regula | 0.9 | 1 | 0.11 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| MTL A. Carrier | 0.9 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.9 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM S. Stastney | 0.9 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| MTL O. Beck | 0.8 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.8 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM C. Lazar | 0.6 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| MTL J. Struble | 0.6 | 0 | 0.18 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 23 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.