Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
EDM3
FinalThu, Apr 3, 2025Every game that night
SJS2

EDM beat SJS 3-2, and the chances backed it up: 2.74 expected goals to 1.86. EDM outshot SJS 38 to 29. J. Skinner led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). B. Kulak had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. C. Pickard stopped 27 of 29.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
EDM1203
SJS1102
  1. 1st 6:22EDMC. Brown0.21 xG
  2. 1st 8:10SJSJ. Thompson0.06 xG
  3. 2nd 2:59EDMV. ArvidssonPP0.15 xG
  4. 2nd 8:48SJST. Toffoli0.27 xG
  5. 2nd 14:57EDMJ. Skinner0.16 xG

Team Stats

EDMSJS
38Shots on goal29
2.74Expected goals1.86
65Shot attempts46
335v5 shots on goal28
1/2Power play0/1
17Hits15
9Blocked shots15
2Penalty minutes4
8Giveaways17
7Takeaways3

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

EDM 2.74 xGSJS 1.86 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdEDM goal, 6:22SJS goal, 8:10EDM goal, 2:59SJS goal, 8:48EDM goal, 14:57

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

EDM37 on goal, 3 scored
SJS29 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. SkinnerLW112300+2013:300:27
V. ArvidssonLW101501-1017:581:46
C. BrownRW101201+2016:120:00
M. JanmarkC011011+2015:110:00
L. DraisaitlC011100-1010:041:14
R. Nugent-HopkinsC000101-1021:321:46
Z. HymanLW000210-1018:081:46
V. PodkolzinRW000133-1017:010:00
A. HenriqueC0002000016:200:59
C. PerryRW0003000012:280:27
K. KapanenRW000220-1012:250:00
M. JonesLW000050009:420:00
E. BouchardD022000+1020:281:46
J. WalmanD0111100221:210:27
D. NurseD000411-1024:000:27
B. KulakD000711+1019:050:00
T. StecherD000300-1017:250:00
T. EmbersonD0001200016:020:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Pickard29272.93159:08Win
O. Rodrigue000–0:00

SJS Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. CelebriniC011200+1021:092:00
T. ToffoliC101410+1019:471:24
A. WennbergC0110030019:361:55
W. EklundLW0001100021:571:54
W. SmithC000001+1020:251:34
C. GrafRW000200+1215:060:36
C. LundC000401-2014:010:06
B. GoodrowC0000100011:530:00
C. GrundstromRW0002210211:300:00
T. DellandreaC0002310011:220:00
Z. OstapchukC000031-1010:430:00
N. GregorLW000101-109:080:00
M. FerraroD022221+2024:410:00
J. ThompsonD101322-1013:190:00
T. LiljegrenD000301+1026:430:26
H. ThrunD0000000019:430:00
M. VlasicD0001010014:470:00
L. CarlssonD000201-2014:420:05
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
G. Romanov38353.92157:15Loss
G. Carriere000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamDarnell Nurse SJS Faces EDM, his team until Apr 20264 SOG
  • Old teamJake Walman EDM Faces SJS, his team until Mar 20251 A, 1 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreEDM 4.0, SJS 2.8EDM 3, SJS 2
Total goals6.95
Shots on goalEDM 33.2, SJS 27.3EDM 38, SJS 29
Win chanceEDM 67%EDM won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM L. Draisaitl3.511.65149%0
SJS M. Celebrini3.320.81126%0
EDM Z. Hyman3.020.84039%0
SJS T. Toffoli3.040.74132%1
EDM E. Bouchard2.701.02218%0
EDM V. Arvidsson2.650.67125%1
EDM D. Nurse2.540.54012%0
EDM J. Skinner2.530.68229%1
EDM J. Walman2.210.53114%0
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins2.210.89026%0
SJS W. Smith2.000.66020%0
SJS W. Eklund1.810.67020%0
SJS C. Grundstrom1.620.23012%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.610.37014%0
EDM C. Brown1.520.39112%1
EDM A. Henrique1.420.52024%0
EDM B. Kulak1.470.3607%0
SJS T. Liljegren1.430.3108%0
SJS C. Graf1.320.40016%0
EDM C. Perry1.330.39019%0
SJS L. Carlsson1.220.3009%0
EDM K. Kapanen1.220.35013%0
SJS J. Thompson1.230.2117%1
SJS N. Gregor1.110.1709%0
SJS A. Wennberg1.100.46115%0
SJS M. Ferraro1.020.2326%0
EDM M. Janmark0.900.32111%0
SJS B. Goodrow0.900.20010%0
SJS T. Dellandrea0.920.2108%0
EDM M. Jones0.900.2008%0
SJS M. Vlasic0.810.1805%0
EDM T. Emberson0.810.2102%0
SJS H. Thrun0.800.1804%0
EDM T. Stecher0.830.1604%0
SJS Z. Ostapchuk0.500.1006%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.