LAK beat NYI 3-2, with the chances close: 3.42 expected goals to 3.36. E. Heineman led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). D. Kuemper stopped 21 of 23.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| NYI | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
- 1st 3:33LAKT. Moore0.13 xG
- 1st 13:07LAKA. Kopitar0.32 xG
- 1st 18:28LAKA. Kempe0.20 xG
- 2nd 10:46NYIE. Heineman0.05 xG
- 3rd 3:38NYIE. Heineman0.09 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
LAK 3.42 xGNYI 3.36 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
LAK Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Kopitar | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 20:53 | 3:46 |
| A. Panarin | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:49 | 5:13 |
| T. Moore | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19:01 | 2:15 |
| A. Kempe | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:35 | 3:35 |
| A. Turcotte | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 12:15 | 0:00 |
| A. Laferriere | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:24 | 3:08 |
| Q. Byfield | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:05 | 2:57 |
| S. Laughton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 18:05 | 2:10 |
| J. Wright | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:14 | 0:00 |
| S. Helenius | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:46 | 0:06 |
| T. Ward | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7:04 | 0:36 |
| J. Malott | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6:44 | 0:04 |
| M. Anderson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | +1 | 0 | 23:44 | 0:00 |
| D. Doughty | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 23:28 | 2:11 |
| B. Clarke | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:15 | 3:39 |
| J. Edmundson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 17:36 | 0:00 |
| C. Ceci | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 16:12 | 0:07 |
| B. Dumoulin | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 14:11 | 0:13 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Kuemper | 23 | 21 | 2 | .913 | 59:35 | Win |
| A. Forsberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
NYI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Horvat | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 23:37 | 3:43 |
| E. Heineman | LW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:44 | 0:00 |
| M. Barzal | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 24:56 | 3:51 |
| J. Pageau | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:59 | 0:25 |
| B. Schenn | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | -1 | 2 | 17:36 | 3:31 |
| S. Holmstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:56 | 0:13 |
| C. Ritchie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:46 | 3:39 |
| A. Lee | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:08 | 0:25 |
| O. Palat | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:50 | 0:00 |
| C. Cizikas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 8:38 | 0:00 |
| M. Shabanov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 7:12 | 0:00 |
| M. Gatcomb | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 6:20 | 0:00 |
| M. Schaefer | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 29:24 | 3:40 |
| A. Pelech | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24:14 | 0:33 |
| R. Pulock | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 22:25 | 0:04 |
| T. DeAngelo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:01 | 0:20 |
| S. Mayfield | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 9:27 | 0:00 |
| C. Soucy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 9:11 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Sorokin | 27 | 24 | 3 | .889 | 57:36 | Loss |
| D. Rittich | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
LAK
NYI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | LAK 2.8, NYI 3.0 | LAK 3, NYI 2 |
| Total goals | 5.8 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | LAK 26.5, NYI 29.0 | LAK 27, NYI 23 |
| Win chance | NYI 54% | LAK won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI B. Horvat | 3.5 | 1 | 0.86 | 2 | 35% | 0 |
| LAK A. Panarin | 3.0 | 4 | 1.09 | 1 | 33% | 0 |
| LAK A. Kempe | 2.9 | 4 | 0.88 | 1 | 34% | 1 |
| LAK A. Laferriere | 2.8 | 2 | 0.52 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| NYI M. Barzal | 2.5 | 3 | 0.96 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NYI A. Lee | 2.5 | 3 | 0.54 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| NYI M. Schaefer | 2.4 | 3 | 0.73 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| LAK T. Moore | 2.3 | 3 | 0.50 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| LAK Q. Byfield | 2.1 | 4 | 0.58 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| LAK B. Clarke | 2.0 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYI E. Heineman | 2.0 | 2 | 0.38 | 2 | 20% | 2 |
| NYI T. DeAngelo | 2.0 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NYI B. Schenn | 1.7 | 1 | 0.60 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| NYI C. Ritchie | 1.5 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| NYI S. Holmstrom | 1.5 | 1 | 0.60 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| NYI A. Pelech | 1.4 | 2 | 0.26 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| LAK A. Kopitar | 1.4 | 3 | 0.71 | 1 | 22% | 1 |
| LAK D. Doughty | 1.4 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYI O. Palat | 1.4 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| LAK S. Laughton | 1.3 | 3 | 0.35 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| NYI J. Pageau | 1.3 | 1 | 0.49 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| NYI M. Shabanov | 1.2 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| LAK T. Ward | 1.2 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYI R. Pulock | 1.1 | 3 | 0.31 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| LAK A. Turcotte | 1.1 | 0 | 0.24 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| LAK J. Edmundson | 1.1 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NYI C. Cizikas | 1.0 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NYI M. Gatcomb | 1.0 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| LAK J. Wright | 0.9 | 2 | 0.22 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| LAK M. Anderson | 0.9 | 0 | 0.24 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| LAK J. Malott | 0.8 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| LAK C. Ceci | 0.8 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NYI C. Soucy | 0.8 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| LAK B. Dumoulin | 0.8 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NYI S. Mayfield | 0.8 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| LAK S. Helenius | 0.7 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.