NSH beat CHI 4-3, with the chances close: 3.36 expected goals to 3.26. L. Evangelista led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). R. Greene had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. J. Saros stopped 24 of 27.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSH | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| CHI | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
- 1st 19:10CHIR. Donato0.05 xG
- 2nd 1:46NSHM. Wood0.07 xG
- 2nd 7:18NSHS. Stamkos0.49 xG
- 2nd 15:14CHIR. GreenePP0.23 xG
- 2nd 16:27NSHL. Evangelista0.08 xG
- 3rd 7:15NSHR. O'Reilly0.24 xG
- 3rd 10:28CHIT. Teravainen0.15 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
NSH 3.36 xGCHI 3.26 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
NSH Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. O'Reilly | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 19:04 | 2:07 |
| L. Evangelista | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 15:36 | 2:13 |
| S. Stamkos | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 15:24 | 2:01 |
| M. Wood | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 12:00 | 0:50 |
| F. Svechkov | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 10:34 | 0:00 |
| E. Haula | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:01 | 1:39 |
| M. McCarron | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 16:18 | 0:00 |
| F. Forsberg | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:15 | 2:00 |
| M. Bunting | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:42 | 2:00 |
| T. Jost | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:07 | 0:00 |
| O. Wiesblatt | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11:09 | 0:00 |
| R. Schaefer | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 10:22 | 0:00 |
| N. Perbix | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 24:31 | 0:00 |
| N. Hague | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 21:21 | 0:41 |
| N. Blankenburg | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16:19 | 1:38 |
| B. Skjei | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 4 | 24:07 | 1:59 |
| R. Josi | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:42 | 2:52 |
| S. Stastney | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:52 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Saros | 27 | 24 | 3 | .889 | 59:47 | Win |
| J. Annunen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
CHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Teravainen | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:47 | 4:56 |
| F. Nazar | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:32 | 5:02 |
| R. Greene | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 19:28 | 2:26 |
| A. Burakovsky | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:51 | 2:55 |
| R. Donato | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:08 | 2:45 |
| O. Moore | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8:59 | 0:39 |
| C. Bedard | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23:23 | 5:12 |
| T. Bertuzzi | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:46 | 5:21 |
| I. Mikheyev | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:37 | 0:00 |
| J. Dickinson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 14:01 | 0:00 |
| C. Dach | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10:06 | 1:26 |
| S. Rinzel | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17:03 | 2:21 |
| W. Kaiser | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 15:52 | 0:00 |
| A. Vlasic | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 21:01 | 0:00 |
| A. Levshunov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20:33 | 5:28 |
| M. Grzelcyk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:49 | 0:34 |
| C. Murphy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:27 | 0:00 |
| L. Crevier | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 10:52 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Soderblom | 29 | 25 | 4 | .862 | 58:45 | Loss |
| S. Knight | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
NSH
CHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | NSH 3.0, CHI 2.9 | NSH 4, CHI 3 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | NSH 29.7, CHI 25.3 | NSH 29, CHI 27 |
| Win chance | NSH 52% | NSH won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSH F. Forsberg | 3.4 | 4 | 0.93 | 0 | 36% | 0 |
| CHI C. Bedard | 2.8 | 5 | 1.08 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| NSH L. Evangelista | 2.7 | 3 | 0.63 | 2 | 20% | 1 |
| NSH R. Josi | 2.7 | 0 | 0.83 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| NSH S. Stamkos | 2.2 | 2 | 0.74 | 2 | 32% | 1 |
| CHI F. Nazar | 2.2 | 2 | 0.74 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| CHI T. Bertuzzi | 2.1 | 0 | 0.80 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| CHI R. Donato | 2.1 | 3 | 0.67 | 1 | 25% | 1 |
| NSH R. O'Reilly | 2.0 | 1 | 0.71 | 2 | 25% | 1 |
| CHI I. Mikheyev | 1.9 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NSH M. Bunting | 1.9 | 3 | 0.59 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| NSH M. Wood | 1.8 | 1 | 0.46 | 1 | 18% | 1 |
| NSH B. Skjei | 1.8 | 3 | 0.43 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| NSH E. Haula | 1.7 | 1 | 0.46 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| CHI A. Burakovsky | 1.6 | 2 | 0.68 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| CHI T. Teravainen | 1.5 | 2 | 0.83 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| NSH N. Blankenburg | 1.4 | 3 | 0.40 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| NSH T. Jost | 1.3 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| CHI R. Greene | 1.3 | 4 | 0.41 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| NSH M. McCarron | 1.3 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| CHI O. Moore | 1.2 | 1 | 0.47 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| NSH N. Perbix | 1.2 | 0 | 0.32 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| CHI J. Dickinson | 1.2 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| CHI S. Rinzel | 1.2 | 1 | 0.32 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI A. Levshunov | 1.2 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NSH N. Hague | 1.1 | 2 | 0.22 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| NSH F. Svechkov | 1.1 | 1 | 0.22 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| CHI C. Dach | 1.1 | 2 | 0.26 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| CHI W. Kaiser | 1.0 | 2 | 0.21 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI A. Vlasic | 1.0 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| CHI M. Grzelcyk | 1.0 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NSH O. Wiesblatt | 1.0 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| CHI L. Crevier | 0.9 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CHI C. Murphy | 0.8 | 2 | 0.17 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NSH S. Stastney | 0.7 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.