DET beat NYI 3-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.53 expected goals to 1.15. L. Raymond led the way with 3 points (0 G, 3 A). A. DeBrincat had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 3.3. J. Gibson stopped 16 of 18.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DET | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
- 1st 4:27NYIE. Heineman0.09 xG
- 3rd 2:03DETA. Sandin-Pellikka0.07 xG
- 3rd 3:55DETA. DeBrincatPP0.12 xG
- 3rd 11:26NYIS. Mayfield0.15 xG
- 3rd 17:43DETA. DeBrincatPP0.14 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
NYI 1.15 xGDET 3.53 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
NYI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Barzal | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:26 | 2:00 |
| J. Drouin | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:47 | 2:00 |
| E. Heineman | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | +1 | 0 | 16:57 | 0:10 |
| A. Lee | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:27 | 0:48 |
| J. Pageau | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:58 | 0:00 |
| M. Shabanov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:15 | 1:50 |
| A. Duclair | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:00 | 1:02 |
| S. Holmstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:42 | 0:00 |
| C. Cizikas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:43 | 0:00 |
| K. MacLean | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:45 | 0:00 |
| C. Ritchie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:28 | 0:00 |
| M. Gatcomb | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:13 | 0:00 |
| S. Mayfield | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 16:14 | 0:00 |
| M. Schaefer | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 25:56 | 2:00 |
| R. Pulock | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 22:42 | 0:10 |
| A. Pelech | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:59 | 0:00 |
| T. DeAngelo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:47 | 0:00 |
| T. Mitchell | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:04 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Sorokin | 21 | 18 | 3 | .857 | 58:06 | Loss |
| D. Rittich | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
DET Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Raymond | LW | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19:51 | 1:31 |
| A. DeBrincat | RW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:50 | 1:31 |
| D. Larkin | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:55 | 1:31 |
| E. Finnie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:25 | 0:00 |
| A. Copp | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:51 | 0:00 |
| M. Rasmussen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:37 | 0:00 |
| J. Compher | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:24 | 0:00 |
| J. van Riemsdyk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 13:45 | 1:31 |
| J. Leonard | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:02 | 0:00 |
| E. Soderblom | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:43 | 0:00 |
| M. Kasper | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:22 | 0:00 |
| N. Danielson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:06 | 0:00 |
| M. Seider | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 24:23 | 1:31 |
| A. Sandin-Pellikka | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 17:36 | 0:00 |
| S. Edvinsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 25:05 | 0:00 |
| B. Chiarot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 21:04 | 0:00 |
| A. Johansson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:55 | 0:00 |
| J. Bernard-Docker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 15:06 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
NYI
DET
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | NYI 2.9, DET 3.1 | NYI 2, DET 3 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | NYI 27.8, DET 30.0 | NYI 18, DET 21 |
| Win chance | DET 53% | DET won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET A. DeBrincat | 3.3 | 6 | 0.87 | 2 | 33% | 2 |
| DET D. Larkin | 2.9 | 2 | 0.90 | 0 | 33% | 0 |
| NYI M. Schaefer | 2.8 | 1 | 0.69 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| NYI M. Barzal | 2.7 | 1 | 0.93 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| DET L. Raymond | 2.4 | 1 | 0.90 | 3 | 27% | 0 |
| NYI A. Lee | 2.3 | 3 | 0.52 | 1 | 23% | 0 |
| DET M. Seider | 2.2 | 0 | 0.55 | 2 | 8% | 0 |
| DET E. Finnie | 1.9 | 2 | 0.42 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| NYI E. Heineman | 1.8 | 3 | 0.47 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| NYI A. Pelech | 1.7 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NYI M. Shabanov | 1.6 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| NYI T. DeAngelo | 1.6 | 2 | 0.43 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| DET J. Riemsdyk | 1.6 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| NYI J. Drouin | 1.5 | 1 | 0.70 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| DET A. Copp | 1.5 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| NYI R. Pulock | 1.4 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| NYI A. Duclair | 1.4 | 1 | 0.47 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| DET B. Chiarot | 1.4 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| DET M. Kasper | 1.4 | 2 | 0.27 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| DET M. Rasmussen | 1.3 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| DET N. Danielson | 1.3 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| DET S. Edvinsson | 1.3 | 2 | 0.36 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NYI C. Ritchie | 1.3 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NYI J. Pageau | 1.3 | 0 | 0.47 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| DET E. Soderblom | 1.2 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| DET J. Compher | 1.2 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| NYI S. Holmstrom | 1.2 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| NYI M. Gatcomb | 1.2 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| DET A. Sandin-Pellikka | 1.1 | 1 | 0.33 | 1 | 6% | 1 |
| NYI C. Cizikas | 1.0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYI S. Mayfield | 1.0 | 1 | 0.18 | 1 | 4% | 1 |
| DET J. Leonard | 1.0 | 2 | 0.13 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| DET J. Bernard-Docker | 0.9 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NYI K. MacLean | 0.9 | 2 | 0.21 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| DET A. Johansson | 0.7 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NYI T. Mitchell | 0.5 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.