Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
SJS2
FinalFri, Apr 11, 2025Every game that night
EDM4

EDM beat SJS 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.48 expected goals to 1.98. EDM outshot SJS 34 to 24. C. McDavid led the way with 4 points (0 G, 4 A). C. Brown had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.8. C. Pickard stopped 22 of 24.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
SJS1102
EDM2024
  1. 1st 6:47EDME. BouchardPP0.07 xG
  2. 1st 15:41EDMT. Emberson0.07 xG
  3. 1st 17:13SJSW. Smith0.03 xG
  4. 2nd 5:44SJSH. Thrun0.02 xG
  5. 3rd 7:32EDMC. PerryPP0.34 xG
  6. 3rd 19:34EDMC. BrownEN0.67 xG

Team Stats

SJSEDM
24Shots on goal34
1.98Expected goals4.48
51Shot attempts76
185v5 shots on goal24
0/2Power play2/5
13Hits22
20Blocked shots14
10Penalty minutes4
18Giveaways6
6Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

SJS 1.98 xGEDM 4.48 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdEDM goal, 6:47EDM goal, 15:41SJS goal, 17:13SJS goal, 5:44EDM goal, 7:32EDM goal, 19:34

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

SJS22 on goal, 2 scored
EDM34 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

SJS Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
W. SmithC1011010220:042:33
W. EklundLW0115020018:402:21
N. KovalenkoRW011000+1015:141:40
A. WennbergC000101-1222:032:18
M. CelebriniC0003100218:462:32
T. ToffoliC000010-1016:452:32
Z. OstapchukC000130+1014:250:00
N. GregorLW0003440012:070:00
B. GoodrowC000000-1211:461:27
C. LundC000120+1011:371:28
T. DellandreaC000311-1210:250:00
C. GrundstromRW000210-108:190:00
H. ThrunD1011030022:480:05
T. LiljegrenD000102-1024:351:28
L. CarlssonD000101+1021:311:36
J. RuttaD000102+1019:290:00
J. ThompsonD0000020012:470:00
M. VlasicD0000010012:230:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
G. Romanov33303.90958:32Loss
A. Georgiev000–0:00

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. McDavidC044400+2223:377:44
A. HenriqueC022012-1017:445:38
C. BrownRW101610+2019:010:00
C. PerryRW1012100015:565:44
V. ArvidssonLW000200-2018:175:38
M. JanmarkC0000000017:260:00
V. PodkolzinRW0000500014:330:00
J. SkinnerLW000101+1014:232:06
K. KapanenRW0002000013:040:00
N. PhilpC0001400011:430:00
M. JonesLW000350009:360:00
Z. HymanLW000200-207:332:00
E. BouchardD112501+1028:246:39
D. NurseD011323-1225:142:06
T. EmbersonD101132+1018:170:00
B. KulakD0001020024:310:38
T. StecherD000103-1016:120:00
M. EkholmD000000001:520:27
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Pickard24222.91758:37Win
S. Skinner000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamDarnell Nurse SJS First game back in Edmonton, his team until Apr 20261 A, 3 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreSJS 2.7, EDM 4.3SJS 2, EDM 4
Total goals7.06
Shots on goalSJS 25.8, EDM 35.4SJS 24, EDM 34
Win chanceEDM 73%EDM won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
SJS M. Celebrini3.230.84026%0
EDM Z. Hyman3.220.89041%0
EDM E. Bouchard3.051.13219%1
EDM C. McDavid3.041.79441%0
SJS T. Toffoli3.000.69030%0
EDM V. Arvidsson2.920.77028%0
EDM D. Nurse2.730.59112%0
EDM J. Skinner2.510.72030%0
EDM M. Ekholm2.200.63013%0
SJS W. Smith2.110.71123%1
EDM B. Kulak1.910.4308%0
SJS W. Eklund1.950.64119%0
EDM C. Brown1.860.50116%1
EDM V. Podkolzin1.700.41016%0
SJS C. Grundstrom1.720.22012%0
EDM A. Henrique1.600.59226%0
SJS T. Liljegren1.510.3509%0
EDM C. Perry1.520.47122%1
SJS J. Thompson1.200.2708%0
SJS L. Carlsson1.210.2508%0
EDM K. Kapanen1.220.35014%0
SJS C. Lund1.210.30013%0
SJS A. Wennberg1.210.46015%0
SJS N. Gregor1.130.1508%0
EDM N. Philp1.010.2309%0
EDM M. Jones1.030.2309%0
EDM T. Stecher1.010.1805%0
EDM M. Janmark1.000.35012%0
SJS B. Goodrow0.900.19010%0
SJS N. Kovalenko0.900.35113%0
EDM T. Emberson0.910.2312%1
SJS J. Rutta0.910.1805%0
SJS H. Thrun0.810.1914%1
SJS T. Dellandrea0.830.1807%0
SJS M. Vlasic0.800.1404%0
SJS Z. Ostapchuk0.510.0905%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.