EDM beat VAN 3-1, and the chances backed it up: 5.73 expected goals to 2.39. EDM outshot VAN 37 to 15. D. Nurse had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. C. Pickard stopped 14 of 15.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| EDM | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
- 2nd 12:21EDMN. Philp0.14 xG
- 2nd 19:09EDMA. Mangiapane0.30 xG
- 3rd 0:47VANB. Boeser0.13 xG
- 3rd 18:47EDML. DraisaitlEN0.30 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
VAN 2.39 xGEDM 5.73 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Boeser | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:38 | 3:32 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:42 | 3:32 |
| E. Kane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | -1 | 4 | 18:49 | 3:25 |
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:49 | 0:00 |
| F. Chytil | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 17:17 | 0:06 |
| E. Pettersson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16:38 | 3:33 |
| D. O'Connor | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:46 | 0:01 |
| K. Sherwood | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 12:13 | 0:00 |
| A. Räty | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:01 | 0:00 |
| A. Bains | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:00 | 0:00 |
| B. Cootes | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:53 | 0:00 |
| J. Lekkerimäki | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9:38 | 0:00 |
| Q. Hughes | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 25:58 | 3:33 |
| F. Hronek | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 27:19 | 1:17 |
| M. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:27 | 0:00 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -2 | 2 | 20:11 | 0:00 |
| D. Forbort | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12:35 | 0:00 |
| E. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:25 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Demko | 36 | 34 | 2 | .944 | 57:41 | Loss |
| K. Lankinen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 24:29 | 7:40 |
| L. Draisaitl | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 24:11 | 7:39 |
| K. Kapanen | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:22 | 0:05 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:19 | 0:00 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:00 | 0:02 |
| N. Philp | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10:48 | 0:01 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:02 | 7:37 |
| D. Tomasek | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:28 | 7:36 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14:51 | 1:49 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:28 | 1:56 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:18 | 1:52 |
| I. Howard | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:17 | 1:02 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | +1 | 2 | 18:38 | 0:50 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25:43 | 7:48 |
| B. Kulak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 18:35 | 0:03 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:27 | 1:45 |
| A. Regula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:44 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:20 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Pickard | 15 | 14 | 1 | .933 | 60:00 | Win |
| S. Skinner | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
VAN
EDM
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | VAN 2.9, EDM 3.4 | VAN 1, EDM 3 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 4 |
| Shots on goal | VAN 24.3, EDM 29.8 | VAN 15, EDM 37 |
| Win chance | EDM 58% | EDM won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.5 | 3 | 1.79 | 1 | 40% | 0 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 3.2 | 2 | 1.51 | 1 | 45% | 1 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 3.2 | 2 | 1.04 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| VAN E. Kane | 2.4 | 1 | 0.53 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| VAN F. Chytil | 2.3 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| VAN Q. Hughes | 2.2 | 0 | 0.86 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 2.1 | 2 | 0.83 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.0 | 3 | 0.58 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 2.0 | 2 | 0.69 | 1 | 28% | 1 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.0 | 2 | 0.54 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 1.9 | 5 | 0.38 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 1.8 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.8 | 1 | 0.45 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 1.6 | 1 | 0.68 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| EDM B. Kulak | 1.4 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN D. O'Connor | 1.4 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| VAN F. Hronek | 1.3 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| EDM K. Kapanen | 1.3 | 0 | 0.31 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.3 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| VAN J. Lekkerimäki | 1.2 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN A. Räty | 1.2 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| EDM N. Philp | 1.2 | 2 | 0.18 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 1.2 | 4 | 0.30 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.1 | 4 | 0.26 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 1.1 | 1 | 0.34 | 1 | 15% | 1 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.1 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| EDM A. Regula | 1.1 | 1 | 0.14 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.1 | 3 | 0.27 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| VAN M. Pettersson | 0.8 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN A. Bains | 0.6 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 0.6 | 1 | 0.11 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.6 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| VAN D. Forbort | 0.5 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 33 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.