EDM beat VAN 6-1, and the chances backed it up: 4.56 expected goals to 1.05. EDM outshot VAN 35 to 12. C. McDavid led the way with 4 points (0 G, 4 A). M. Savoie had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.2. C. Ingram stopped 11 of 12.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| EDM | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
- 1st 1:58EDMJ. Samanski0.10 xG
- 1st 6:48EDMM. Savoie0.13 xG
- 1st 12:10VANT. Mueller0.20 xG
- 1st 14:35EDMM. SavoiePP0.15 xG
- 1st 19:02EDMM. Savoie0.13 xG
- 2nd 16:46EDMR. Nugent-HopkinsPP0.27 xG
- 3rd 8:20EDMC. Dach0.19 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
VAN 1.05 xGEDM 4.56 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Mueller | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 12:59 | 0:00 |
| C. Douglas | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 12:00 | 0:00 |
| L. Ohgren | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 18:19 | 0:18 |
| B. Boeser | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:15 | 1:44 |
| T. Blueger | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 16:27 | 0:00 |
| L. Karlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 16:19 | 0:16 |
| E. Pettersson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:59 | 1:44 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:11 | 1:02 |
| A. Räty | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:06 | 0:00 |
| N. Hoglander | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:36 | 0:58 |
| M. Rossi | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 13:15 | 1:42 |
| D. O'Connor | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 5 | 11:15 | 0:00 |
| F. Hronek | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 27:44 | 1:52 |
| Z. Buium | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 21:38 | 0:08 |
| M. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:06 | 0:00 |
| K. Kudryavtsev | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:33 | 0:00 |
| T. Willander | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 17:29 | 0:16 |
| E. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 7 | 14:53 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Lankinen | 35 | 29 | 6 | .829 | 60:00 | Loss |
| N. Tolopilo | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 18:16 | 1:56 |
| M. Savoie | C | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:59 | 2:29 |
| C. Dach | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 5 | 13:42 | 0:00 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:11 | 3:56 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:48 | 3:25 |
| J. Samanski | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 14:27 | 0:00 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:02 | 3:27 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:22 | 0:31 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 14:37 | 0:00 |
| K. Kapanen | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:17 | 0:00 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 12:23 | 0:00 |
| C. Lazar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 10:14 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 21:52 | 3:52 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:21 | 0:00 |
| C. Murphy | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 5 | 16:34 | 0:00 |
| J. Walman | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:19 | 0:04 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 19:01 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:54 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
VAN
EDM
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | VAN 2.9, EDM 4.0 | VAN 1, EDM 6 |
| Total goals | 6.9 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | VAN 24.4, EDM 32.1 | VAN 12, EDM 35 |
| Win chance | EDM 66% | EDM won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.9 | 3 | 1.95 | 4 | 44% | 0 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.7 | 2 | 1.30 | 3 | 23% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 2.7 | 1 | 0.93 | 1 | 39% | 0 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.4 | 2 | 0.53 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 2.2 | 1 | 0.73 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 2.2 | 6 | 0.63 | 3 | 22% | 3 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 2.2 | 1 | 0.71 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 2.1 | 4 | 0.94 | 1 | 27% | 1 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.0 | 2 | 0.42 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 2.0 | 3 | 0.61 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| VAN D. O'Connor | 1.8 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 1.8 | 0 | 0.74 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| VAN F. Hronek | 1.7 | 1 | 0.59 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM K. Kapanen | 1.6 | 1 | 0.46 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| VAN L. Ohgren | 1.5 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.5 | 0 | 0.57 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM J. Walman | 1.5 | 3 | 0.39 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| VAN L. Karlsson | 1.5 | 2 | 0.43 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| VAN M. Rossi | 1.4 | 1 | 0.63 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.4 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| VAN T. Blueger | 1.3 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 1.3 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN N. Hoglander | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| EDM C. Murphy | 1.1 | 2 | 0.30 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN A. Räty | 1.0 | 2 | 0.24 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| VAN T. Willander | 0.9 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| VAN Z. Buium | 0.9 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM C. Dach | 0.9 | 1 | 0.22 | 2 | 9% | 1 |
| VAN M. Pettersson | 0.8 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN C. Douglas | 0.8 | 0 | 0.10 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM C. Lazar | 0.7 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 0.6 | 1 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN T. Mueller | 0.6 | 1 | 0.15 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| EDM J. Samanski | 0.6 | 1 | 0.22 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.6 | 3 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.