Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
VAN5
FinalWed, Mar 26, 2025Every game that night
NYI2

VAN beat NYI 5-2, with the chances close: 3.49 expected goals to 3.16. K. Sherwood led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). P. Engvall had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.2. T. Demko stopped 26 of 28.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
VAN0325
NYI0202
  1. 2nd 2:39VANK. Sherwood0.08 xG
  2. 2nd 5:35NYIC. CizikasSH0.28 xG
  3. 2nd 9:00NYIT. DeAngelo0.26 xG
  4. 2nd 13:59VANA. Räty0.12 xG
  5. 2nd 19:37VAND. Forbort0.07 xG
  6. 3rd 1:05VANT. Blueger0.10 xG
  7. 3rd 18:08VANK. SherwoodEN0.81 xG

Team Stats

VANNYI
25Shots on goal28
3.49Expected goals3.16
64Shot attempts66
205v5 shots on goal23
0/1Power play0/2
21Hits28
12Blocked shots18
6Penalty minutes4
18Giveaways14
4Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

VAN 3.49 xGNYI 3.16 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdVAN goal, 2:39NYI goal, 5:35NYI goal, 9:00VAN goal, 13:59VAN goal, 19:37VAN goal, 1:05VAN goal, 18:08

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

VAN24 on goal, 5 scored
NYI28 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

VAN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. SherwoodLW213441+3015:431:00
P. SuterC022010+1218:551:00
D. O'ConnorLW022000+2015:410:00
C. GarlandRW0113020016:361:00
J. DeBruskLW011201+1015:161:00
T. BluegerC101200+1015:050:00
A. RätyC101320+2010:480:00
B. BoeserRW000200-1017:431:00
D. JoshuaC000170+1012:410:00
L. KarlssonC0003400012:251:00
J. LekkerimäkiRW000020-1012:001:00
N. AmanC0000010011:310:00
F. HronekD0110010025:421:00
Q. HughesD011103-1224:031:00
M. PetterssonD011212+3218:450:00
D. ForbortD101100+1016:040:00
T. MyersD000101+4022:391:00
E. PetterssonD0000000012:230:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
T. Demko28262.92960:00Win
A. Silovs000–0:00

NYI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. CizikasC112220+2013:190:00
J. PageauC011011-1016:142:06
B. HorvatC000210-2221:133:19
K. PalmieriC000041-1018:311:36
A. LeeLW000411-2017:411:58
S. HolmstromRW000111-1017:281:55
A. DuclairLW000211-2216:402:05
P. EngvallLW000540+1012:530:00
M. GatcombC000140-2011:220:00
H. FaschingRW0000030011:150:26
M. TsyplakovRW000110-2011:040:00
K. MacLeanC000030-2010:230:00
T. DeAngeloD101412-1022:552:52
N. DobsonD000100-2023:102:20
A. PelechD000102-2021:340:00
A. RomanovD000235+1020:430:00
R. PulockD0000110016:231:08
M. ReillyD000200-2015:261:40
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
I. Sorokin19154.78941:05Loss
M. Hogberg5501.00016:41

Storylines That Played Out

  • HometownDrew O'Connor VAN Plays near home (born in Chatham)2 A, 0 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreVAN 2.9, NYI 3.0VAN 5, NYI 2
Total goals5.97
Shots on goalVAN 26.2, NYI 27.7VAN 25, NYI 28
Win chanceNYI 52%VAN won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
NYI B. Horvat2.820.78032%0
VAN Q. Hughes2.711.10114%0
NYI A. Lee2.240.57025%0
NYI K. Palmieri2.200.70028%0
NYI N. Dobson2.210.62014%0
VAN J. DeBrusk2.220.59128%0
VAN C. Garland2.130.58122%0
VAN B. Boeser2.020.74031%0
NYI T. DeAngelo2.040.63114%1
VAN P. Suter1.800.49222%0
VAN K. Sherwood1.640.42318%2
NYI A. Pelech1.510.3405%0
VAN F. Hronek1.500.5217%0
NYI J. Pageau1.400.54117%0
VAN D. O'Connor1.400.32215%0
NYI A. Duclair1.420.49023%0
NYI S. Holmstrom1.410.59024%0
NYI A. Romanov1.320.3208%0
NYI M. Reilly1.320.2306%0
NYI P. Engvall1.250.30013%0
VAN J. Lekkerimäki1.200.25012%0
VAN T. Myers1.210.3104%0
NYI R. Pulock1.200.3108%0
VAN T. Blueger1.120.3019%1
NYI C. Cizikas1.120.25210%1
NYI M. Tsyplakov1.010.35010%0
NYI H. Fasching0.900.25010%0
VAN M. Pettersson0.920.3213%0
VAN D. Joshua0.910.31015%0
VAN L. Karlsson0.830.1409%0
VAN A. Räty0.830.20110%1
NYI K. MacLean0.800.1909%0
NYI M. Gatcomb0.810.25014%0
VAN E. Pettersson0.700.1302%0
VAN D. Forbort0.610.1513%1
VAN N. Aman0.600.2007%0

Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.