VAN beat NYI 5-2, with the chances close: 3.49 expected goals to 3.16. K. Sherwood led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). P. Engvall had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.2. T. Demko stopped 26 of 28.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| NYI | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
- 2nd 2:39VANK. Sherwood0.08 xG
- 2nd 5:35NYIC. CizikasSH0.28 xG
- 2nd 9:00NYIT. DeAngelo0.26 xG
- 2nd 13:59VANA. Räty0.12 xG
- 2nd 19:37VAND. Forbort0.07 xG
- 3rd 1:05VANT. Blueger0.10 xG
- 3rd 18:08VANK. SherwoodEN0.81 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
VAN 3.49 xGNYI 3.16 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Sherwood | LW | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 15:43 | 1:00 |
| P. Suter | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 18:55 | 1:00 |
| D. O'Connor | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:41 | 0:00 |
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 16:36 | 1:00 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:16 | 1:00 |
| T. Blueger | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:05 | 0:00 |
| A. Räty | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 10:48 | 0:00 |
| B. Boeser | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:43 | 1:00 |
| D. Joshua | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:41 | 0:00 |
| L. Karlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:25 | 1:00 |
| J. Lekkerimäki | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:00 | 1:00 |
| N. Aman | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:31 | 0:00 |
| F. Hronek | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25:42 | 1:00 |
| Q. Hughes | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 2 | 24:03 | 1:00 |
| M. Pettersson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +3 | 2 | 18:45 | 0:00 |
| D. Forbort | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:04 | 0:00 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +4 | 0 | 22:39 | 1:00 |
| E. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:23 | 0:00 |
NYI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Cizikas | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 13:19 | 0:00 |
| J. Pageau | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:14 | 2:06 |
| B. Horvat | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 21:13 | 3:19 |
| K. Palmieri | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:31 | 1:36 |
| A. Lee | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 17:41 | 1:58 |
| S. Holmstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:28 | 1:55 |
| A. Duclair | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 16:40 | 2:05 |
| P. Engvall | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:53 | 0:00 |
| M. Gatcomb | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 11:22 | 0:00 |
| H. Fasching | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11:15 | 0:26 |
| M. Tsyplakov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 11:04 | 0:00 |
| K. MacLean | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 10:23 | 0:00 |
| T. DeAngelo | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 22:55 | 2:52 |
| N. Dobson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 23:10 | 2:20 |
| A. Pelech | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 21:34 | 0:00 |
| A. Romanov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | +1 | 0 | 20:43 | 0:00 |
| R. Pulock | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:23 | 1:08 |
| M. Reilly | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 15:26 | 1:40 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Sorokin | 19 | 15 | 4 | .789 | 41:05 | Loss |
| M. Hogberg | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1.000 | 16:41 |
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | VAN 2.9, NYI 3.0 | VAN 5, NYI 2 |
| Total goals | 5.9 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | VAN 26.2, NYI 27.7 | VAN 25, NYI 28 |
| Win chance | NYI 52% | VAN won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI B. Horvat | 2.8 | 2 | 0.78 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| VAN Q. Hughes | 2.7 | 1 | 1.10 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| NYI A. Lee | 2.2 | 4 | 0.57 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| NYI K. Palmieri | 2.2 | 0 | 0.70 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| NYI N. Dobson | 2.2 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.2 | 2 | 0.59 | 1 | 28% | 0 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.1 | 3 | 0.58 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 2.0 | 2 | 0.74 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| NYI T. DeAngelo | 2.0 | 4 | 0.63 | 1 | 14% | 1 |
| VAN P. Suter | 1.8 | 0 | 0.49 | 2 | 22% | 0 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 1.6 | 4 | 0.42 | 3 | 18% | 2 |
| NYI A. Pelech | 1.5 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| VAN F. Hronek | 1.5 | 0 | 0.52 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| NYI J. Pageau | 1.4 | 0 | 0.54 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| VAN D. O'Connor | 1.4 | 0 | 0.32 | 2 | 15% | 0 |
| NYI A. Duclair | 1.4 | 2 | 0.49 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| NYI S. Holmstrom | 1.4 | 1 | 0.59 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NYI A. Romanov | 1.3 | 2 | 0.32 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI M. Reilly | 1.3 | 2 | 0.23 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NYI P. Engvall | 1.2 | 5 | 0.30 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| VAN J. Lekkerimäki | 1.2 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.2 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NYI R. Pulock | 1.2 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN T. Blueger | 1.1 | 2 | 0.30 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| NYI C. Cizikas | 1.1 | 2 | 0.25 | 2 | 10% | 1 |
| NYI M. Tsyplakov | 1.0 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYI H. Fasching | 0.9 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| VAN M. Pettersson | 0.9 | 2 | 0.32 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| VAN D. Joshua | 0.9 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| VAN L. Karlsson | 0.8 | 3 | 0.14 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| VAN A. Räty | 0.8 | 3 | 0.20 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| NYI K. MacLean | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NYI M. Gatcomb | 0.8 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 0.7 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| VAN D. Forbort | 0.6 | 1 | 0.15 | 1 | 3% | 1 |
| VAN N. Aman | 0.6 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.