Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
WPG5
FinalSat, Oct 26, 2024Every game that night
CGY3

WPG beat CGY 5-3, with the chances close: 2.96 expected goals to 2.34. K. Connor led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). M. Weegar had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.4. E. Comrie stopped 26 of 29.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
WPG2035
CGY1113
  1. 1st 0:28CGYM. Backlund0.02 xG
  2. 1st 1:51WPGN. EhlersPP0.11 xG
  3. 1st 17:37WPGK. ConnorSH0.23 xG
  4. 2nd 17:28CGYR. Andersson0.01 xG
  5. 3rd 1:01WPGD. Samberg0.02 xG
  6. 3rd 4:19CGYN. Kadri0.09 xG
  7. 3rd 16:16WPGC. PerfettiPP0.09 xG
  8. 3rd 18:46WPGM. AppletonEN0.82 xG

Team Stats

WPGCGY
35Shots on goal29
2.96Expected goals2.34
64Shot attempts74
245v5 shots on goal24
2/4Power play0/4
18Hits31
17Blocked shots18
12Penalty minutes22
15Giveaways16
6Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

WPG 2.96 xGCGY 2.34 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdCGY goal, 0:28WPG goal, 1:51WPG goal, 17:37CGY goal, 17:28WPG goal, 1:01CGY goal, 4:19WPG goal, 16:16WPG goal, 18:46

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

WPG35 on goal, 5 scored
CGY29 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

WPG Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. ConnorLW1125000020:133:25
A. LowryC022211+2016:370:08
M. AppletonC1123210014:150:12
N. NiederreiterRW022350+1211:210:29
N. EhlersLW1015010216:013:27
C. PerfettiC1011010013:110:16
V. NamestnikovC0111100012:100:16
M. ScheifeleC000103-1220:183:26
G. VilardiC000200-1019:063:30
M. BarronC000121-1210:550:00
A. IafalloLW000100009:410:16
R. KupariC000110-108:290:00
N. PionkD022311+2219:580:53
J. MorrisseyD011202-2023:573:01
D. SambergD101210+3219:380:11
D. DeMeloD000035-2021:580:00
L. StanleyD0001110017:590:00
C. MillerD000100-1013:240:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Comrie29263.89760:00Win
C. Hellebuyck000–0:00

CGY Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. KuzmenkoLW0220100017:175:38
M. BacklundC1011110021:071:54
N. KadriC101310-11218:365:43
C. ZaryC0114000017:251:40
Y. SharangovichC000020-1019:235:57
B. ColemanLW0001330018:201:59
J. HuberdeauLW0001210018:025:32
A. ManthaRW000100-1012:281:48
M. PospisilC000011+1210:530:00
A. KlapkaRW000131029:150:00
J. KirklandC000110009:010:00
R. LombergLW000121008:380:00
R. AnderssonD1013020423:421:53
K. BahlD011123+2022:550:17
M. WeegarD000661-1227:135:44
D. MiromanovD0003220018:200:00
J. HanleyD0002120010:360:00
B. PachalD0000300010:090:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Wolf34304.88258:27Loss
D. Vladar000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreWPG 3.3, CGY 3.1WPG 5, CGY 3
Total goals6.38
Shots on goalWPG 29.4, CGY 32.6WPG 35, CGY 29
Win chanceWPG 53%WPG won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CGY N. Kadri3.630.84128%1
WPG K. Connor3.250.95236%1
CGY B. Coleman2.810.60025%0
CGY M. Backlund2.610.53119%1
WPG N. Ehlers2.650.77125%1
CGY M. Weegar2.460.49012%0
CGY Y. Sharangovich2.300.63026%0
WPG M. Scheifele2.210.97033%0
WPG G. Vilardi2.120.73030%0
WPG J. Morrissey2.020.76112%0
WPG N. Niederreiter1.930.46221%0
CGY A. Kuzmenko1.900.73229%0
WPG C. Perfetti1.910.56118%1
CGY M. Pospisil1.800.40013%0
CGY R. Andersson1.830.50110%1
CGY J. Huberdeau1.810.71019%0
CGY C. Zary1.840.55120%0
CGY D. Miromanov1.630.2507%0
WPG N. Pionk1.530.4326%0
CGY A. Mantha1.510.49019%0
WPG M. Appleton1.430.39213%1
WPG A. Lowry1.420.42216%0
WPG M. Barron1.210.23011%0
WPG C. Miller1.210.2205%0
WPG V. Namestnikov1.110.43114%0
WPG D. Samberg1.120.2313%1
WPG A. Iafallo1.010.30012%0
CGY B. Pachal1.000.1403%0
CGY A. Klapka0.910.1508%0
CGY R. Lomberg0.910.1308%0
WPG D. DeMelo0.900.3204%0
WPG L. Stanley0.910.1603%0
WPG R. Kupari0.910.1706%0
CGY K. Bahl0.910.1713%0
CGY J. Kirkland0.810.31011%0
CGY J. Hanley0.520.1102%0

Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.