WPG beat CHI 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 5.00 expected goals to 0.96. WPG outshot CHI 29 to 14. M. Appleton led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). M. Barron had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.1. C. Hellebuyck stopped 12 of 14.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| CHI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 9:01CHIA. VlasicPP0.05 xG
- 1st 13:31WPGG. Vilardi0.05 xG
- 1st 19:47CHIA. Martinez0.09 xG
- 2nd 13:10WPGN. Niederreiter0.07 xG
- 3rd 10:18WPGM. Scheifele0.58 xG
- 3rd 18:19WPGM. AppletonEN0.81 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
WPG 5.00 xGCHI 0.96 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
WPG Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Connor | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:59 | 2:18 |
| M. Appleton | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 16:31 | 0:00 |
| M. Scheifele | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 21:01 | 2:19 |
| G. Vilardi | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:16 | 2:16 |
| N. Niederreiter | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 15:51 | 1:44 |
| C. Perfetti | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:31 | 2:23 |
| V. Namestnikov | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:30 | 1:42 |
| A. Lowry | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:28 | 0:00 |
| B. Lambert | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:06 | 1:42 |
| A. Iafallo | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:52 | 1:34 |
| M. Barron | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:29 | 0:00 |
| R. Kupari | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9:06 | 0:00 |
| H. Fleury | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +2 | 0 | 19:05 | 0:00 |
| L. Stanley | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:06 | 0:00 |
| J. Morrissey | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24:04 | 2:04 |
| N. Pionk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 23:30 | 1:56 |
| D. DeMelo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22:44 | 0:02 |
| V. Heinola | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 13:30 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Hellebuyck | 14 | 12 | 2 | .857 | 60:00 | Win |
| E. Comrie | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
CHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Bedard | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:26 | 0:21 |
| T. Teravainen | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:44 | 0:21 |
| J. Dickinson | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 16:21 | 0:00 |
| I. Mikheyev | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:20 | 0:00 |
| N. Foligno | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 16:24 | 0:00 |
| P. Kurashev | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:14 | 0:00 |
| T. Bertuzzi | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:23 | 0:21 |
| T. Hall | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 14:37 | 0:00 |
| R. Donato | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:21 | 0:21 |
| L. Reichel | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 13:27 | 0:00 |
| P. Maroon | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:11 | 0:00 |
| C. Smith | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 10:59 | 0:00 |
| A. Vlasic | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | -3 | 0 | 25:08 | 0:21 |
| A. Martinez | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 13:53 | 0:00 |
| C. Murphy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 22:46 | 0:00 |
| T. Brodie | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 19:40 | 0:00 |
| W. Kaiser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:14 | 0:00 |
| N. Allan | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:40 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Mrazek | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1.000 | 10:46 | |
| A. Soderblom | 24 | 21 | 3 | .875 | 47:26 | Loss |
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | WPG 3.3, CHI 2.4 | WPG 4, CHI 2 |
| Total goals | 5.7 | 6 |
| Shots on goal | WPG 30.1, CHI 28.0 | WPG 29, CHI 14 |
| Win chance | WPG 63% | WPG won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG K. Connor | 3.5 | 2 | 1.07 | 2 | 40% | 0 |
| CHI C. Bedard | 2.7 | 0 | 0.74 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| WPG G. Vilardi | 2.3 | 1 | 0.80 | 1 | 34% | 1 |
| CHI R. Donato | 2.3 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| WPG M. Scheifele | 2.3 | 4 | 1.05 | 1 | 37% | 1 |
| WPG J. Morrissey | 2.2 | 1 | 0.88 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| CHI T. Hall | 2.2 | 1 | 0.55 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| WPG N. Niederreiter | 2.1 | 4 | 0.50 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| WPG C. Perfetti | 2.0 | 2 | 0.63 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| CHI T. Bertuzzi | 1.8 | 1 | 0.51 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| WPG N. Pionk | 1.8 | 0 | 0.56 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| CHI C. Smith | 1.7 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| CHI T. Teravainen | 1.7 | 1 | 0.51 | 1 | 19% | 0 |
| CHI I. Mikheyev | 1.7 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| CHI N. Foligno | 1.6 | 1 | 0.42 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| WPG M. Appleton | 1.5 | 3 | 0.40 | 2 | 14% | 1 |
| WPG A. Lowry | 1.5 | 2 | 0.49 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| CHI J. Dickinson | 1.3 | 0 | 0.35 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| WPG H. Fleury | 1.3 | 0 | 0.19 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CHI L. Reichel | 1.3 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| CHI A. Vlasic | 1.3 | 3 | 0.28 | 1 | 4% | 1 |
| CHI P. Kurashev | 1.2 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| WPG V. Namestnikov | 1.2 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| WPG A. Iafallo | 1.2 | 0 | 0.33 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| CHI A. Martinez | 1.2 | 1 | 0.24 | 1 | 5% | 1 |
| CHI C. Murphy | 1.1 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| WPG M. Barron | 1.1 | 4 | 0.20 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| WPG V. Heinola | 1.0 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| CHI P. Maroon | 0.9 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| WPG D. DeMelo | 0.9 | 3 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| CHI W. Kaiser | 0.9 | 2 | 0.16 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| WPG R. Kupari | 0.9 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| WPG L. Stanley | 0.9 | 1 | 0.17 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CHI T. Brodie | 0.6 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| CHI N. Allan | 0.6 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 13 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.