Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
ANA4
Final/OTSat, Dec 14, 2024Every game that night
CBJ3

ANA beat CBJ 4-3 in overtime despite fewer good chances: 2.95 expected goals to 4.05. CBJ outshot ANA 42 to 27. A. Killorn led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). Z. Werenski had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 3.5. J. Gibson stopped 39 of 42.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
ANA11114
CBJ20103
  1. 1st 16:33ANAM. McTavish0.11 xG
  2. 1st 17:09CBJK. MarchenkoPP0.07 xG
  3. 1st 17:43CBJC. Sillinger0.13 xG
  4. 2nd 13:56ANAA. Killorn0.18 xG
  5. 3rd 11:25CBJJ. van Riemsdyk0.20 xG
  6. 3rd 17:14ANAJ. LaCombe0.06 xG
  7. OT 1:43ANAA. Killorn0.22 xG

Team Stats

ANACBJ
27Shots on goal42
2.95Expected goals4.05
59Shot attempts73
255v5 shots on goal37
0/1Power play1/2
21Hits23
23Blocked shots16
4Penalty minutes2
14Giveaways14
6Takeaways1

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

ANA 2.95 xGCBJ 4.05 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdOTANA goal, 16:33CBJ goal, 17:09CBJ goal, 17:43ANA goal, 13:56CBJ goal, 11:25ANA goal, 17:14ANA goal, 1:43

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

ANA27 on goal, 4 scored
CBJ41 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. KillornLW213201+3017:570:56
T. TerryRW022401+1017:441:04
R. FabbriC022100+2216:150:56
R. StromeC011210+1015:591:04
M. McTavishC101312+1215:300:54
L. CarlssonC0002110016:291:04
F. VatranoRW000040-1016:151:04
C. GauthierLW000110+1015:350:56
B. LeasonRW000113-1015:170:00
I. LundestromC0001110013:060:00
B. McGinnLW0000200011:450:00
J. HarkinsC0002120011:180:00
J. LaCombeD112313+1022:161:04
B. DumoulinD000002-1020:260:00
J. TroubaD0002160020:250:00
R. GudasD0000200019:340:00
P. MintyukovD000130+1018:300:02
O. ZellwegerD000211+1018:230:56
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Gibson42393.92961:32Win
L. Dostal000–0:00

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. MarchenkoRW101621-1019:471:59
K. JohnsonC0115000018:221:59
J. van RiemsdykLW1013100017:240:37
C. SillingerC101320-3015:440:37
Z. Aston-ReeseLW011122-1013:250:00
M. OlivierRW011250-2213:070:00
K. LabancRW011001+109:230:37
S. MonahanC0001000020:481:59
D. VoronkovLW0001000019:301:59
A. FantilliC0001310018:370:37
S. KuralyC000162+109:450:00
M. PyyhtiaLW000210008:070:00
Z. WerenskiD011700-1028:202:36
D. SeversonD0112030022:260:00
I. ProvorovD000001-1023:170:00
D. FabbroD000114-1022:550:00
J. ChristiansenD0002000011:190:00
J. JohnsonD0004010010:530:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Greaves27234.85261:43OT loss
E. Merzlikins000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreANA 3.0, CBJ 3.5ANA 4, CBJ 3
Total goals6.57
Shots on goalANA 28.3, CBJ 33.9ANA 27, CBJ 42
Win chanceCBJ 59%ANA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CBJ Z. Werenski3.570.98120%0
ANA F. Vatrano3.400.73033%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.660.73130%1
CBJ S. Monahan2.610.85027%0
ANA T. Terry2.540.90232%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.310.63027%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.210.59022%0
CBJ K. Johnson2.250.77126%0
CBJ C. Sillinger2.230.50117%1
ANA O. Zellweger2.020.3809%0
ANA C. Gauthier2.010.50017%0
ANA R. Strome1.820.61120%0
ANA A. Killorn1.820.61324%2
ANA M. McTavish1.830.63123%1
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.730.51118%1
CBJ D. Severson1.720.55114%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.610.33115%0
ANA J. Trouba1.620.3006%0
ANA B. Leason1.610.41017%0
CBJ D. Fabbro1.610.3408%0
ANA R. Fabbri1.510.51225%0
ANA L. Carlsson1.420.48019%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.400.3808%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.420.37116%0
ANA P. Mintyukov1.310.3908%0
ANA R. Gudas1.200.2405%0
ANA B. McGinn1.200.28015%0
CBJ K. Labanc1.100.32111%0
ANA J. LaCombe1.130.3128%1
ANA B. Dumoulin1.100.2704%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.110.26012%0
ANA I. Lundestrom0.910.29014%0
CBJ J. Christiansen0.920.1903%0
CBJ M. Pyyhtia0.920.2009%0
ANA J. Harkins0.820.1908%0
CBJ J. Johnson0.740.1303%0

Shots on goal: 16 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.