ANA beat NYR 4-1, with the chances close: 3.25 expected goals to 2.73. C. Gauthier led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). J. LaCombe had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. L. Dostal stopped 26 of 27.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| NYR | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
- 2nd 7:18ANAJ. LaCombeSH0.36 xG
- 2nd 16:18NYRM. Robertson0.03 xG
- 3rd 5:51ANAC. GauthierPP0.08 xG
- 3rd 19:38ANAC. GauthierEN0.94 xG
- 3rd 19:57ANAP. Mintyukov0.16 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
ANA 3.25 xGNYR 2.73 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
ANA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Gauthier | LW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:34 | 1:41 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 11:37 | 0:00 |
| L. Carlsson | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:49 | 4:09 |
| A. Killorn | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:56 | 0:00 |
| B. Sennecke | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:44 | 1:28 |
| R. Johnston | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 8:40 | 0:00 |
| C. Kreider | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:24 | 4:26 |
| T. Terry | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:55 | 4:22 |
| M. Granlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16:29 | 4:19 |
| F. Vatrano | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:23 | 0:00 |
| M. McTavish | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:21 | 1:27 |
| R. Strome | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:16 | 1:22 |
| J. LaCombe | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 28:23 | 4:17 |
| J. Trouba | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 23:22 | 0:02 |
| P. Mintyukov | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 20:05 | 0:00 |
| O. Zellweger | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 11:27 | 1:32 |
| R. Gudas | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:49 | 0:00 |
| I. Moore | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10:59 | 0:00 |
NYR Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Panarin | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 22:02 | 4:56 |
| A. Lafrenière | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:08 | 4:24 |
| V. Trocheck | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 22:48 | 4:26 |
| J. Miller | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 21:46 | 4:46 |
| W. Cuylle | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 17:49 | 4:14 |
| N. Laba | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:43 | 2:51 |
| C. Sheary | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:13 | 2:53 |
| J. Brodzinski | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:12 | 2:32 |
| T. Raddysh | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 11:27 | 2:06 |
| B. Berard | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:24 | 0:01 |
| S. Carrick | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:12 | 0:08 |
| M. Rempe | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 9:01 | 1:08 |
| M. Robertson | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:27 | 0:00 |
| V. Gavrikov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 25:12 | 2:29 |
| B. Schneider | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 22:10 | 0:00 |
| C. Soucy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 15:55 | 0:08 |
| W. Borgen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14:49 | 0:18 |
| U. Vaakanainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:29 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Shesterkin | 25 | 22 | 3 | .880 | 59:13 | Loss |
| J. Quick | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
ANA
NYR
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | ANA 2.8, NYR 3.2 | ANA 4, NYR 1 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | ANA 29.3, NYR 28.9 | ANA 26, NYR 27 |
| Win chance | NYR 56% | ANA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYR A. Panarin | 3.2 | 5 | 1.30 | 1 | 38% | 0 |
| ANA C. Gauthier | 3.1 | 5 | 0.74 | 2 | 26% | 2 |
| ANA T. Terry | 2.5 | 0 | 0.79 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| NYR V. Trocheck | 2.5 | 2 | 0.97 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| ANA C. Kreider | 2.5 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| NYR J. Miller | 2.4 | 4 | 1.15 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| ANA L. Carlsson | 2.4 | 3 | 0.85 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| ANA B. Sennecke | 2.1 | 1 | 0.71 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| NYR W. Cuylle | 2.1 | 4 | 0.60 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NYR A. Lafrenière | 2.1 | 1 | 0.65 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| ANA M. McTavish | 2.0 | 0 | 0.55 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| ANA J. LaCombe | 1.9 | 5 | 0.51 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| ANA F. Vatrano | 1.8 | 2 | 0.34 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| ANA M. Granlund | 1.8 | 1 | 0.64 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| NYR V. Gavrikov | 1.7 | 2 | 0.48 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| ANA O. Zellweger | 1.7 | 0 | 0.31 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| NYR C. Sheary | 1.7 | 1 | 0.43 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| ANA J. Trouba | 1.6 | 3 | 0.27 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| NYR B. Berard | 1.6 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NYR B. Schneider | 1.5 | 4 | 0.33 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| ANA A. Killorn | 1.5 | 1 | 0.37 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| NYR J. Brodzinski | 1.4 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| NYR M. Robertson | 1.3 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 5% | 1 |
| NYR N. Laba | 1.3 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| NYR W. Borgen | 1.3 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| ANA R. Poehling | 1.2 | 1 | 0.36 | 2 | 13% | 0 |
| NYR C. Soucy | 1.1 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| ANA R. Strome | 1.1 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| ANA I. Moore | 1.1 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| ANA R. Gudas | 1.0 | 2 | 0.17 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| ANA P. Mintyukov | 1.0 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 5% | 1 |
| NYR S. Carrick | 0.9 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYR T. Raddysh | 0.9 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYR M. Rempe | 0.9 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYR U. Vaakanainen | 0.8 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| ANA R. Johnston | 0.6 | 0 | 0.15 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.