Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
ANA3
Final/SOThu, Jan 16, 2025Every game that night
TBL4

TBL beat ANA 4-3 in a shootout, and the chances backed it up: 4.51 expected goals to 2.22. N. Kucherov led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). M. McTavish had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.7. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 34 of 37.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdSOT
ANA11103
TBL12014
  1. 1st 6:03ANAT. Terry0.02 xG
  2. 1st 14:19TBLA. CirelliPP0.21 xG
  3. 2nd 2:51TBLJ. GuentzelPP0.81 xG
  4. 2nd 11:26ANAL. Carlsson0.04 xG
  5. 2nd 15:26TBLB. Point0.17 xG
  6. 3rd 9:53ANAR. Fabbri0.08 xG

Team Stats

ANATBL
37Shots on goal35
2.22Expected goals4.51
61Shot attempts66
305v5 shots on goal16
0/2Power play2/5
24Hits12
12Blocked shots12
12Penalty minutes6
13Giveaways15
3Takeaways2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

ANA 2.22 xGTBL 4.51 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdOTANA goal, 6:03TBL goal, 14:19TBL goal, 2:51ANA goal, 11:26TBL goal, 15:26ANA goal, 9:53

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

ANA37 on goal, 3 scored
TBL35 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. TerryRW1016000222:182:38
R. StromeC0111100019:112:22
M. McTavishC011610+1019:111:39
L. CarlssonC101300+1016:362:26
R. FabbriC101200+1211:201:34
A. KillornLW000312+1021:221:35
F. VatranoRW000303+1021:212:25
I. LundestromC000010+1015:280:00
C. GauthierLW000130+1011:341:19
J. HarkinsC0002100010:510:00
N. NesterenkoC000120007:460:00
R. JohnstonLW000040006:020:00
J. TroubaD011133+2021:030:02
P. MintyukovD011210+1020:030:22
B. DumoulinD011000+1018:190:00
J. LaCombeD0002120424:452:16
R. GudasD0003520422:050:00
O. ZellwegerD0001000015:301:22
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
L. Dostal35323.91464:33OT loss
J. Gibson000–0:00

TBL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. KucherovRW0223000027:278:42
B. PointC1013100022:455:36
B. HagelLW011701-1222:273:55
A. CirelliC101500-1022:093:06
J. GuentzelC101200-1220:334:47
N. PaulLW0000000016:475:02
L. GlendeningC0001010012:070:00
Z. GirgensonsC0002310212:070:00
M. EyssimontC0002200010:540:00
M. ChaffeeRW000210-1010:063:39
C. GeekieC000000-208:010:00
C. AtkinsonRW000200-107:130:00
V. HedmanD011423+1028:234:35
D. RaddyshD011211-1021:044:08
N. PerbixD011003-1018:170:00
R. McDonaghD000001-2026:180:00
E. LillebergD000021-1021:480:00
E. CernakD000000000:340:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Vasilevskiy37343.91965:00Win
J. Johansson000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamAlex Killorn ANA Faces TBL, his team until Apr 20233 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreANA 2.6, TBL 3.8ANA 3, TBL 4
Total goals6.47
Shots on goalANA 26.7, TBL 32.3ANA 37, TBL 35
Win chanceTBL 68%TBL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
TBL N. Kucherov3.531.75239%0
TBL J. Guentzel2.921.10138%1
ANA F. Vatrano2.830.57026%0
TBL B. Hagel2.771.13135%0
TBL B. Point2.731.26145%1
TBL V. Hedman2.640.91116%0
ANA T. Terry2.360.74127%1
TBL A. Cirelli1.950.75126%1
TBL M. Eyssimont1.820.27012%0
TBL N. Paul1.800.59024%0
ANA C. Gauthier1.810.42014%0
ANA M. McTavish1.760.48119%0
ANA A. Killorn1.730.52022%0
TBL D. Raddysh1.720.4617%0
ANA O. Zellweger1.610.2808%0
ANA R. Strome1.610.50116%0
ANA J. Trouba1.610.2716%0
ANA R. Fabbri1.620.45122%1
ANA J. LaCombe1.620.40010%0
ANA N. Nesterenko1.510.24012%0
ANA L. Carlsson1.430.41117%1
TBL R. McDonagh1.200.3704%0
TBL C. Geekie1.200.35015%0
ANA R. Gudas1.230.2405%0
TBL C. Atkinson1.220.26012%0
TBL N. Perbix1.200.3217%0
TBL Z. Girgensons1.120.20011%0
ANA P. Mintyukov1.120.2816%0
TBL E. Cernak1.000.2503%0
TBL M. Chaffee1.020.28015%0
ANA B. Dumoulin1.000.2214%0
ANA J. Harkins0.920.1708%0
TBL E. Lilleberg0.900.2202%0
ANA I. Lundestrom0.800.22011%0
TBL L. Glendening0.810.1409%0
ANA R. Johnston0.400.1104%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.