Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
BUF3
Final/OTFri, Nov 22, 2024Every game that night
ANA2

BUF beat ANA 3-2 in overtime, with the chances close: 3.99 expected goals to 3.35. BUF outshot ANA 32 to 24. A. Tuch led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). U. Luukkonen stopped 22 of 24.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
BUF02013
ANA11002
  1. 1st 4:02ANAD. Helleson0.04 xG
  2. 2nd 14:07ANAI. Lundestrom0.07 xG
  3. 2nd 18:37BUFA. Tuch0.19 xG
  4. 2nd 19:27BUFJ. Zucker0.20 xG
  5. OT 4:00BUFJ.Kulich0.39 xG

Team Stats

BUFANA
32Shots on goal24
3.99Expected goals3.35
76Shot attempts55
285v5 shots on goal18
0/2Power play0/2
17Hits25
10Blocked shots19
11Penalty minutes11
9Giveaways10
3Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

BUF 3.99 xGANA 3.35 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdOTANA goal, 4:02ANA goal, 14:07BUF goal, 18:37BUF goal, 19:27BUF goal, 4:00

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

BUF33 on goal, 3 scored
ANA23 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

BUF Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. TuchRW112220+1019:312:19
J.KulichC101411+1015:460:35
J. ZuckerLW101410+1215:422:55
J. PeterkaRW000400-1022:213:21
R. McLeodC000100-1017:470:00
J. QuinnRW000222-1017:001:43
D. CozensC000021+1016:382:51
Z. BensonLW0002010414:191:09
P. KrebsC000220+1012:300:00
S. LaffertyC000001+1012:230:00
B. MalenstynLW000020-1011:370:00
N. Aube-KubelRW0000100011:030:00
O. PowerD022300+3023:200:39
R. DahlinD0004020026:153:22
B. ByramD0002000023:571:06
H. JokiharjuD000000-1016:410:00
J. BrysonD000110-1015:440:00
C. CliftonD0001320515:260:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
U. Luukkonen24222.91764:00Win
J. Reimer000–0:00

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. ZegrasC0112100018:541:37
L. CarlssonC011000+1017:432:18
I. LundestromC101201-1017:070:09
R. JohnstonLW011140+109:340:02
A. KillornLW000301+1218:431:32
F. VatranoRW000241-1018:142:21
B. LeasonRW0003010217:241:37
T. TerryRW0000000017:232:16
R. StromeC0001120015:402:13
C. GauthierLW000211-1015:311:36
J. HarkinsC000041-1211:520:00
S. ColangeloRW000201-109:580:08
O. ZellwegerD0111200021:082:23
D. HellesonD1012030015:400:00
P. MintyukovD000125-1022:251:38
B. DumoulinD000020+1021:020:10
R. GudasD000032-1520:010:00
J. LaCombeD0002100019:410:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Gibson32303.93864:00OT loss
L. Dostal000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamOlen Zellweger BUF Faces ANA, his team until May 20261 A, 1 SOG
  • BirthdayOwen Power BUF Turns 22 that day2 A, 3 SOG
  • HometownJason Zucker BUF Plays near home (born in Newport Beach)1 G, 4 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreBUF 3.3, ANA 2.8BUF 3, ANA 2
Total goals6.15
Shots on goalBUF 31.0, ANA 27.3BUF 32, ANA 24
Win chanceBUF 58%BUF won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
ANA F. Vatrano3.120.65029%0
BUF R. Dahlin2.940.83019%0
BUF A. Tuch2.821.00231%1
BUF J. Peterka2.740.74028%0
BUF D. Cozens2.600.66024%0
ANA T. Terry2.200.78028%0
BUF J. Zucker2.140.58122%1
ANA T. Zegras2.120.67122%0
ANA C. Gauthier2.020.46014%0
ANA A. Killorn1.930.61024%0
BUF J.Kulich1.840.24114%1
ANA R. Strome1.810.54018%0
BUF J. Quinn1.720.52018%0
ANA L. Carlsson1.700.53121%0
ANA O. Zellweger1.710.39111%0
BUF O. Power1.530.5129%0
BUF Z. Benson1.420.45017%0
BUF B. Byram1.420.58016%0
BUF R. McLeod1.410.48019%0
ANA P. Mintyukov1.310.3909%0
ANA B. Leason1.330.37015%0
BUF H. Jokiharju1.200.2705%0
ANA R. Gudas1.200.2505%0
ANA B. Dumoulin1.100.2705%0
BUF B. Malenstyn1.000.2208%0
BUF C. Clifton1.010.2405%0
BUF P. Krebs1.020.33011%0
ANA I. Lundestrom1.020.28113%1
BUF S. Lafferty0.900.25012%0
ANA D. Helleson0.920.3317%1
ANA J. Harkins0.900.1808%0
ANA J. LaCombe0.920.2606%0
BUF N. Aube-Kubel0.800.2109%0
ANA R. Johnston0.610.1516%0
BUF J. Bryson0.510.1903%0

Shots on goal: 16 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.