CAR beat PHI 4-3 in a shootout, and the chances backed it up: 3.55 expected goals to 2.06. T. Zegras led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). P. Kochetkov stopped 15 of 18.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | SO | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| PHI | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
- 1st 10:04PHIB. Brink0.12 xG
- 1st 17:34PHIT. Zegras0.29 xG
- 2nd 9:11CARN. Ehlers0.10 xG
- 2nd 14:12CARA. Nikishin0.02 xG
- 3rd 12:26CARS. Jarvis0.44 xG
- 3rd 12:49PHIC. Grundstrom0.12 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
CAR 3.55 xGPHI 2.06 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
CAR Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Ehlers | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:14 | 0:49 |
| S. Jarvis | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:24 | 3:11 |
| A. Svechnikov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:11 | 3:08 |
| T. Hall | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:48 | 0:52 |
| J. Blake | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 21:25 | 3:39 |
| S. Aho | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:51 | 3:09 |
| L. Stankoven | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:16 | 0:51 |
| J. Staal | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:06 | 0:21 |
| J. Martinook | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:39 | 0:00 |
| W. Carrier | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:54 | 0:00 |
| E. Robinson | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:18 | 0:00 |
| M. Jankowski | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:54 | 0:00 |
| S. Gostisbehere | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 25:58 | 2:32 |
| J. Nystrom | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:49 | 0:00 |
| A. Nikishin | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:26 | 1:28 |
| S. Walker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 23:45 | 0:00 |
| K. Miller | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 22:53 | 0:00 |
| J. Chatfield | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22:12 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Kochetkov | 18 | 15 | 3 | .833 | 64:57 | Win |
| F. Andersen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Zegras | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 18:24 | 0:00 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:25 | 0:00 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 14:36 | 0:00 |
| B. Brink | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:55 | 0:00 |
| R. Abols | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:10 | 0:00 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:10 | 0:00 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | +2 | 0 | 17:45 | 0:00 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:35 | 0:00 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 15:22 | 0:00 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 14:59 | 0:00 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:29 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:01 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 25:48 | 0:00 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 22:02 | 0:00 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:00 | 0:00 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | +2 | 0 | 22:58 | 0:00 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 22:57 | 0:00 |
| T. Murchison | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:24 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
CAR
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | CAR 3.2, PHI 2.5 | CAR 4, PHI 3 |
| Total goals | 5.6 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | CAR 28.9, PHI 23.2 | CAR 21, PHI 18 |
| Win chance | CAR 61% | CAR won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR S. Jarvis | 2.6 | 3 | 0.85 | 1 | 32% | 1 |
| CAR A. Svechnikov | 2.6 | 0 | 0.76 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| CAR N. Ehlers | 2.5 | 2 | 0.77 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| CAR S. Aho | 2.3 | 0 | 0.92 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.3 | 1 | 0.59 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.2 | 1 | 0.74 | 2 | 24% | 1 |
| CAR J. Blake | 2.1 | 2 | 0.62 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.1 | 2 | 0.80 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| CAR L. Stankoven | 2.1 | 3 | 0.51 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| CAR S. Walker | 2.0 | 2 | 0.31 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.0 | 1 | 0.61 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| CAR S. Gostisbehere | 1.7 | 1 | 0.72 | 2 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.7 | 2 | 0.54 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.7 | 1 | 0.52 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.7 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | 13% | 1 |
| CAR T. Hall | 1.6 | 0 | 0.50 | 1 | 19% | 0 |
| CAR K. Miller | 1.5 | 1 | 0.43 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.5 | 2 | 0.48 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.4 | 0 | 0.51 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| CAR A. Nikishin | 1.4 | 1 | 0.33 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| CAR J. Staal | 1.4 | 2 | 0.41 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| CAR W. Carrier | 1.3 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 2 | 0.38 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| CAR J. Chatfield | 1.2 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| CAR E. Robinson | 1.2 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| CAR J. Martinook | 1.2 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 1.1 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.0 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.0 | 0 | 0.16 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.0 | 0 | 0.32 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| CAR J. Nystrom | 1.0 | 1 | 0.16 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CAR M. Jankowski | 0.9 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.8 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.6 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.5 | 0 | 0.09 | 1 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 25 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.