Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CHI5
FinalSat, Oct 12, 2024Every game that night
EDM2

CHI beat EDM 5-2 despite fewer good chances: 2.01 expected goals to 3.49. EDM outshot CHI 38 to 20. T. Teravainen led the way with 4 points (2 G, 2 A). T. Teravainen had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. P. Mrazek stopped 36 of 38.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CHI1225
EDM0112
  1. 1st 15:50CHIP. Kurashev0.08 xG
  2. 2nd 4:55EDMC. Perry0.23 xG
  3. 2nd 10:19CHIS. JonesPP0.09 xG
  4. 2nd 13:58CHIC. Bedard0.07 xG
  5. 3rd 5:35CHIT. TeravainenPP0.10 xG
  6. 3rd 10:01EDML. DraisaitlPP0.28 xG
  7. 3rd 19:13CHIT. TeravainenPP0.06 xG

Team Stats

CHIEDM
20Shots on goal38
2.01Expected goals3.49
37Shot attempts95
175v5 shots on goal32
3/3Power play1/3
16Hits9
35Blocked shots12
6Penalty minutes6
10Giveaways9
9Takeaways13

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CHI 2.01 xGEDM 3.49 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdCHI goal, 15:50EDM goal, 4:55CHI goal, 10:19CHI goal, 13:58CHI goal, 5:35EDM goal, 10:01CHI goal, 19:13

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CHI20 on goal, 5 scored
EDM37 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. TeravainenC2246000017:261:42
C. BedardC123102+1018:061:42
P. KurashevC101300+1014:570:00
T. HallLW011201+1013:430:00
N. FolignoLW000042+1019:251:42
J. DickinsonC000212-1015:230:00
T. BertuzziLW000110+1014:161:24
J. AndersonRW0000120014:150:00
I. MikheyevRW0000000014:040:00
R. DonatoC0000100212:340:00
P. MaroonLW0001100011:380:00
A. AthanasiouC0000020010:470:00
S. JonesD123312+1224:551:42
A. VlasicD0110140023:500:18
W. KaiserD011043+1016:330:00
T. BrodieD011002-1015:520:00
C. MurphyD0001160219:110:00
A. MartinezD0000070018:200:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
P. Mrazek38362.94760:00Win
A. Soderblom000–0:00

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
L. DraisaitlC101100-1223:503:58
C. McDavidC011312-1223:324:18
R. Nugent-HopkinsC0112000020:334:00
J. SkinnerLW011210+1016:090:47
C. PerryRW101311+109:500:44
Z. HymanLW0002000021:114:01
V. ArvidssonLW0001010016:250:27
A. HenriqueC000101-1013:180:00
C. BrownRW000300-1012:060:00
M. JanmarkC000201-1210:030:00
V. PodkolzinRW000020009:190:00
D. RyanC000100008:590:00
M. EkholmD011411+1021:300:06
E. BouchardD0001010026:564:39
D. NurseD000422+1018:210:45
T. DermottD0002010017:550:00
B. KulakD000300-2016:100:00
T. EmbersonD000311-2014:390:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Pickard20155.75057:32Loss
S. Skinner000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCHI 2.1, EDM 4.1CHI 5, EDM 2
Total goals6.27
Shots on goalCHI 22.3, EDM 34.4CHI 20, EDM 38
Win chanceEDM 79%CHI won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM Z. Hyman4.121.11047%0
EDM C. McDavid4.032.02147%0
EDM V. Arvidsson3.710.93030%0
EDM L. Draisaitl3.111.50146%1
EDM E. Bouchard3.011.16017%0
CHI C. Bedard2.810.75322%1
EDM J. Skinner2.820.73130%0
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins2.421.08129%0
CHI T. Hall2.320.55121%0
CHI T. Bertuzzi2.210.57022%0
EDM M. Ekholm2.240.59111%0
CHI S. Jones2.130.43310%1
CHI T. Teravainen1.960.59421%2
EDM D. Nurse1.840.3708%0
CHI N. Foligno1.700.40015%0
CHI R. Donato1.600.32014%0
CHI I. Mikheyev1.600.33016%0
EDM A. Henrique1.610.57025%0
CHI P. Kurashev1.630.48115%1
EDM C. Brown1.530.35012%0
CHI A. Athanasiou1.500.32014%0
CHI J. Dickinson1.420.32015%0
EDM C. Perry1.330.35117%1
EDM M. Janmark1.220.35014%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.200.25013%0
EDM B. Kulak1.230.2904%0
CHI J. Anderson1.100.25011%0
EDM T. Emberson1.130.3404%0
CHI A. Martinez1.000.2205%0
CHI C. Murphy0.910.1506%0
EDM D. Ryan0.910.20010%0
CHI A. Vlasic0.800.2014%0
EDM T. Dermott0.820.1705%0
CHI P. Maroon0.810.2007%0
CHI W. Kaiser0.700.2213%0
CHI T. Brodie0.600.2513%0

Shots on goal: 13 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.