Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

13 games

LAK1
BOS2
Final/OT
Team1st2nd3rdOTT
LAK01001
BOS01012
3.71Expected goals1.41
34Shots on goal26
65Shot attempts50
  1. T. Moore LAK1 G, 7 SOG
  2. D. Pastrnak BOS1 G, 2 SOG
  3. E. Lindholm BOS1 G, 1 SOG

J. Swayman BOS33 saves on 34, the win

We had BOS at 54% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection.

FLA2
BUF5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
FLA1102
BUF2215
1.59Expected goals3.81
25Shots on goal27
45Shot attempts65
  1. A. Tuch BUF1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  2. M. Samuelsson BUF1 G, 4 SOG
  3. S. Bennett FLA1 G, 3 SOG

D. Levi BUF23 saves on 25, the win

We had FLA at 55% to win; BUF won. Shots on goal: 24 of 34 players within one of their projection.

PIT2
TOR4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PIT1012
TOR0224
2.45Expected goals3.48
23Shots on goal33
57Shot attempts50
  1. W. Nylander TOR2 G, 4 SOG
  2. M. Marner TOR1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  3. E. Malkin PIT2 A, 1 SOG

A. Stolarz TOR21 saves on 23, the win

We had TOR at 59% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 25 of 35 players within one of their projection.

OTT1
MTL4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
OTT0011
MTL2024
1.70Expected goals3.07
25Shots on goal26
63Shot attempts41
  1. C. Caufield MTL2 G, 3 SOG
  2. L. Hutson MTL2 A, 1 SOG
  3. J. Slafkovský MTL2 A, 1 SOG

S. Montembeault MTL24 saves on 25, the win

We had OTT at 55% to win; MTL won. Shots on goal: 18 of 34 players within one of their projection.

NSH0
DET3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NSH0000
DET0123
4.50Expected goals3.81
42Shots on goal22
89Shot attempts46
  1. J. Compher DET1 G, 4 SOG
  2. A. Copp DET1 G, 2 SOG
  3. D. Larkin DET1 G, 2 SOG

C. Talbot DET42 saves on 42, the win

We had NSH at 57% to win; DET won. Shots on goal: 13 of 35 players within one of their projection.

UTA6
NYR5
Final/OT
Team1st2nd3rdOTT
UTA14016
NYR13105
3.33Expected goals3.30
26Shots on goal34
60Shot attempts70
  1. C. Keller UTA2 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  2. A. Fox NYR3 A, 0 SOG
  3. A. Panarin NYR2 G, 4 SOG

C. Ingram UTA29 saves on 34, the win

We had NYR at 61% to win; UTA won. Shots on goal: 19 of 35 players within one of their projection.

NJD5
WSH3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NJD2215
WSH1113
4.12Expected goals2.82
33Shots on goal32
59Shot attempts56
  1. E. Haula NJD3 A, 2 SOG
  2. S. Noesen NJD3 A, 1 SOG
  3. P. Cotter NJD2 G, 4 SOG

J. Markstrom NJD29 saves on 32, the win

We had NJD at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection.

NYI0
DAL3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NYI0000
DAL1113
3.23Expected goals2.92
34Shots on goal27
68Shot attempts45
  1. T. Seguin DAL2 G, 2 SOG
  2. M. Marchment DAL2 A, 3 SOG
  3. J. Benn DAL1 G, 2 SOG

J. Oettinger DAL34 saves on 34, the win

We had DAL at 60% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 34 players within one of their projection.

SEA5
MIN4
Final/SO
Team1st2nd3rdSOT
SEA02215
MIN11204
3.24Expected goals2.73
34Shots on goal38
56Shot attempts62
  1. K. Kaprizov MIN1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  2. J. Eberle SEA2 G, 2 SOG
  3. M. Boldy MIN1 G, 1 A, 6 SOG

J. Daccord SEA34 saves on 38, the win

We had MIN at 56% to win; SEA won. Shots on goal: 16 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CBJ6
COL4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CBJ2316
COL1214
3.14Expected goals4.25
23Shots on goal30
45Shot attempts71
  1. E. Chinakhov CBJ1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  2. S. Monahan CBJ1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  3. K. Marchenko CBJ1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG

D. Tarasov CBJ26 saves on 30, the win

We had COL at 71% to win; CBJ won. Shots on goal: 20 of 33 players within one of their projection.

PHI3
CGY6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PHI0213
CGY2136
2.88Expected goals4.26
40Shots on goal32
70Shot attempts60
  1. J. Huberdeau CGY2 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  2. A. Kuzmenko CGY3 A, 1 SOG
  3. T. Konecny PHI2 G, 5 SOG

D. Wolf CGY37 saves on 40, the win

We had CGY at 58% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 14 of 34 players within one of their projection.

CHI5
EDM2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CHI1225
EDM0112
2.01Expected goals3.49
20Shots on goal38
37Shot attempts95
  1. T. Teravainen CHI2 G, 2 A, 6 SOG
  2. S. Jones CHI1 G, 2 A, 3 SOG
  3. C. Bedard CHI1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG

P. Mrazek CHI36 saves on 38, the win

We had EDM at 79% to win; CHI won. Shots on goal: 13 of 36 players within one of their projection.

ANA2
SJS0
Final
2.04Expected goals3.20
30Shots on goal30
49Shot attempts65
  1. I. Lundestrom ANA1 G, 2 SOG
  2. T. Zegras ANA1 G, 2 SOG
  3. B. McGinn ANA1 A, 2 SOG

L. Dostal ANA30 saves on 30, the win

We had ANA at 53% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 34 players within one of their projection.