Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
COL2
FinalMon, Nov 25, 2024Every game that night
TBL8

TBL beat COL 8-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.09 expected goals to 2.55. TBL outshot COL 33 to 25. B. Hagel led the way with 5 points (0 G, 5 A). I. Ivan had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.0. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 23 of 25.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
COL1012
TBL5128
  1. 1st 5:41TBLN. Perbix0.14 xG
  2. 1st 7:46TBLJ. GuentzelPP0.11 xG
  3. 1st 8:56COLI. Ivan0.57 xG
  4. 1st 10:03TBLN. Kucherov0.05 xG
  5. 1st 13:15TBLL. GlendeningSH0.38 xG
  6. 1st 19:46TBLA. Cirelli0.26 xG
  7. 2nd 9:38TBLB. PointPP0.08 xG
  8. 3rd 1:08COLI. Ivan0.05 xG
  9. 3rd 3:09TBLJ. Guentzel0.30 xG
  10. 3rd 4:44TBLM. Eyssimont0.07 xG

Team Stats

COLTBL
25Shots on goal33
2.55Expected goals4.09
53Shot attempts64
225v5 shots on goal27
0/3Power play2/2
22Hits11
13Blocked shots17
4Penalty minutes6
26Giveaways24
4Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

COL 2.55 xGTBL 4.09 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdTBL goal, 5:41TBL goal, 7:46COL goal, 8:56TBL goal, 10:03TBL goal, 13:15TBL goal, 19:46TBL goal, 9:38COL goal, 1:08TBL goal, 3:09TBL goal, 4:44

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

COL25 on goal, 2 scored
TBL33 on goal, 8 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

COL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
I. IvanC202500+1015:290:53
V. NichushkinRW0112000016:290:51
N. MacKinnonC000000-3021:515:42
M. RantanenRW000221-3021:005:42
A. LehkonenLW000211-3020:325:00
C. MittelstadtC000000-1020:234:39
L. O'ConnorRW000220-1013:000:07
J. KivirantaLW000320-1012:200:07
N. KovalenkoRW000200-1011:190:00
M. WoodLW0002100011:040:00
P. KellyC000011-1010:510:07
T. TynanC000000029:020:11
J. MansonD011131+2219:420:07
C. MakarD000241-1024:335:00
S. GirardD000012+1020:560:18
D. ToewsD000102-2020:431:16
C. de HaanD000023-3014:200:00
S. MalinskiD000131-4014:200:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Annunen16115.68830:03Loss
A. Georgiev17143.82429:57

TBL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. HagelLW055501+3022:421:29
N. KucherovRW1234000018:491:27
J. GuentzelC202211-1018:081:30
A. CirelliC101201+2020:190:36
Z. GirgensonsC011014+1015:570:00
L. GlendeningC101102+2015:380:00
B. PointC101301-2015:011:26
M. EyssimontC101500+2013:520:00
C. GeekieC000000+2012:120:37
G. GoncalvesC000210+2010:560:39
M. ChaffeeRW000110009:550:40
N. PerbixD112220+3414:190:00
E. CernakD011230+2016:130:00
J. MoserD0000020222:080:00
V. HedmanD0000000019:571:11
R. McDonaghD000202+2017:410:00
E. LillebergD000022+1015:550:00
D. RaddyshD0002010014:180:55
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Vasilevskiy25232.92060:00Win
J. Johansson000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCOL 3.4, TBL 3.3COL 2, TBL 8
Total goals6.610
Shots on goalCOL 30.0, TBL 27.8COL 25, TBL 33
Win chanceCOL 51%TBL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
COL N. MacKinnon4.101.52040%0
TBL N. Kucherov3.341.68338%1
TBL J. Guentzel3.021.10237%2
COL M. Rantanen2.721.16037%0
COL C. Makar2.721.09024%0
COL V. Nichushkin2.520.85133%0
COL A. Lehkonen2.420.84031%0
TBL B. Hagel2.451.04533%0
TBL B. Point2.331.02139%1
TBL V. Hedman2.100.87013%0
TBL A. Cirelli1.920.79126%1
COL C. Mittelstadt1.700.71020%0
COL D. Toews1.710.57011%0
COL M. Wood1.620.27012%0
TBL M. Eyssimont1.550.23110%1
COL J. Manson1.410.3219%0
TBL C. Geekie1.300.36015%0
COL S. Malinski1.310.3007%0
COL P. Kelly1.200.22010%0
COL L. O'Connor1.220.31012%0
COL S. Girard1.100.3906%0
TBL M. Chaffee1.110.39018%0
COL I. Ivan1.050.26211%2
COL J. Kiviranta1.030.21010%0
TBL R. McDonagh1.020.3504%0
TBL D. Raddysh1.020.3205%0
COL C. Haan1.000.1504%0
TBL J. Moser0.900.3407%0
TBL G. Goncalves0.920.27012%0
TBL Z. Girgensons0.900.1719%0
TBL N. Perbix0.920.2624%1
TBL E. Cernak0.820.2213%0
COL N. Kovalenko0.820.25010%0
COL T. Tynan0.700.1607%0
TBL L. Glendening0.710.1118%1
TBL E. Lilleberg0.600.1802%0

Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.