ANA beat EDM 6-5 despite fewer good chances: 3.29 expected goals to 4.13. M. Savoie led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). M. Savoie had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.2. L. Dostal stopped 22 of 27.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| ANA | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
- 1st 0:13EDMJ. Roslovic0.13 xG
- 1st 9:03EDMR. Nugent-Hopkins0.22 xG
- 1st 10:30ANAI. Moore0.04 xG
- 2nd 3:01ANAA. KillornPP0.43 xG
- 2nd 18:45EDMZ. Hyman0.10 xG
- 2nd 19:20EDME. Bouchard0.09 xG
- 3rd 1:30ANAL. Carlsson0.05 xG
- 3rd 2:55ANAO. Zellweger0.01 xG
- 3rd 5:53EDMM. SavoiePP0.47 xG
- 3rd 6:39ANAB. Sennecke0.17 xG
- 3rd 18:46ANAC. Gauthier0.11 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
EDM 4.13 xGANA 3.29 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Savoie | C | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:28 | 0:17 |
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 22:02 | 3:12 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:12 | 3:14 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:17 | 3:15 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 15:28 | 0:45 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:18 | 0:43 |
| L. Draisaitl | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 20:35 | 3:20 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12:42 | 0:25 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:14 | 0:00 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:16 | 0:00 |
| C. Lazar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 10:13 | 0:00 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2:30 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 22:16 | 2:56 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 19:30 | 0:29 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | 21:24 | 0:08 |
| J. Walman | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 21:18 | 1:01 |
| S. Stastney | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:51 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15:34 | 0:00 |
ANA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Carlsson | C | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:01 | 4:52 |
| C. Kreider | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:36 | 2:03 |
| A. Killorn | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 22:14 | 5:29 |
| M. McTavish | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 19:06 | 4:45 |
| B. Sennecke | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:27 | 2:47 |
| C. Gauthier | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 15:15 | 2:01 |
| T. Terry | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:52 | 4:23 |
| J. Harkins | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 11:34 | 0:00 |
| R. Johnston | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 9:55 | 0:00 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 17:53 | 2:43 |
| J. Viel | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:18 | 0:00 |
| T. Washe | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 11:35 | 0:00 |
| J. LaCombe | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 22:27 | 2:32 |
| J. Trouba | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:58 | 0:49 |
| I. Moore | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 19:21 | 0:00 |
| O. Zellweger | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:47 | 0:00 |
| R. Gudas | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:23 | 0:16 |
| P. Mintyukov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 20:21 | 5:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
EDM
ANA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | EDM 3.7, ANA 3.3 | EDM 5, ANA 6 |
| Total goals | 6.9 | 11 |
| Shots on goal | EDM 30.9, ANA 29.0 | EDM 27, ANA 29 |
| Win chance | EDM 55% | ANA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.7 | 2 | 1.75 | 2 | 41% | 0 |
| ANA C. Gauthier | 3.4 | 3 | 0.84 | 1 | 30% | 1 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 3.1 | 3 | 0.93 | 1 | 40% | 1 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 3.1 | 3 | 1.14 | 2 | 22% | 1 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 3.0 | 3 | 1.51 | 0 | 45% | 0 |
| ANA B. Sennecke | 2.7 | 2 | 0.93 | 1 | 28% | 1 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.2 | 0 | 0.38 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| ANA M. McTavish | 2.1 | 1 | 0.62 | 1 | 23% | 0 |
| ANA L. Carlsson | 2.1 | 4 | 0.79 | 3 | 26% | 1 |
| ANA T. Terry | 2.1 | 0 | 0.72 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| EDM J. Walman | 2.0 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| ANA C. Kreider | 2.0 | 1 | 0.69 | 2 | 34% | 0 |
| ANA A. Killorn | 2.0 | 4 | 0.51 | 1 | 22% | 1 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 2.0 | 2 | 0.90 | 2 | 25% | 1 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.9 | 0 | 0.51 | 2 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 1.8 | 2 | 0.48 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| ANA J. Trouba | 1.7 | 4 | 0.37 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| ANA J. LaCombe | 1.6 | 1 | 0.63 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.4 | 3 | 0.42 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| ANA J. Viel | 1.4 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| ANA R. Poehling | 1.3 | 3 | 0.51 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| ANA O. Zellweger | 1.3 | 2 | 0.26 | 1 | 7% | 1 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.2 | 4 | 0.27 | 3 | 13% | 1 |
| ANA P. Mintyukov | 1.0 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.0 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| ANA R. Gudas | 0.9 | 0 | 0.20 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| ANA J. Harkins | 0.9 | 0 | 0.19 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 0.9 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM S. Stastney | 0.8 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| ANA I. Moore | 0.8 | 3 | 0.22 | 1 | 4% | 1 |
| ANA T. Washe | 0.8 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 0.8 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.7 | 2 | 0.22 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM C. Lazar | 0.6 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| ANA R. Johnston | 0.6 | 0 | 0.19 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.5 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.