Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
EDM3
FinalThu, Jan 9, 2025Every game that night
PIT5

PIT beat EDM 5-3, with the chances close: 2.82 expected goals to 3.18. EDM outshot PIT 43 to 26. S. Crosby led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). E. Bouchard had 10 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. A. Nedeljkovic stopped 40 of 43.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
EDM1203
PIT4105
  1. 1st 3:19PITR. Rakell0.50 xG
  2. 1st 7:22PITB. Rust0.06 xG
  3. 1st 9:46PITK. Hayes0.16 xG
  4. 1st 12:33EDML. Draisaitl0.10 xG
  5. 1st 13:41PITD. O'Connor0.12 xG
  6. 2nd 5:42PITS. CrosbyPP0.22 xG
  7. 2nd 10:58EDML. Draisaitl0.03 xG
  8. 2nd 19:15EDMR. Nugent-HopkinsPP0.17 xG

Team Stats

EDMPIT
43Shots on goal26
3.18Expected goals2.82
85Shot attempts51
325v5 shots on goal23
1/3Power play1/1
16Hits16
13Blocked shots24
4Penalty minutes8
14Giveaways9
0Takeaways3

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

EDM 3.18 xGPIT 2.82 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdPIT goal, 3:19PIT goal, 7:22PIT goal, 9:46EDM goal, 12:33PIT goal, 13:41PIT goal, 5:42EDM goal, 10:58EDM goal, 19:15

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

EDM43 on goal, 3 scored
PIT26 on goal, 5 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. McDavidC0333110026:554:49
L. DraisaitlC202710+1027:204:48
Z. HymanLW0113120023:304:47
R. Nugent-HopkinsC101100-2019:154:47
V. ArvidssonLW0005010014:230:00
A. HenriqueC000100-1013:170:18
M. JanmarkC000210-1012:230:00
V. PodkolzinRW0001100212:160:00
C. BrownRW000111-1010:550:00
C. PerryRW000200009:380:19
J. SkinnerLW000100-108:160:17
K. KapanenRW000001-127:070:00
E. BouchardD0111010+1026:534:44
M. EkholmD011121+1026:290:19
D. NurseD000310-2022:040:22
B. KulakD000202-2018:020:00
T. EmbersonD000041-1011:300:00
J. BrownD000023-1010:020:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Skinner26215.80857:04Loss
C. Pickard000–0:00

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. RustRW123213+1223:370:41
S. CrosbyC123400+1021:200:41
D. O'ConnorLW112210+2012:440:00
R. RakellRW1011040020:570:41
M. BuntingLW0111200412:020:41
J. PuljujarviRW011031+1010:060:00
K. HayesRW101200+109:330:00
N. AcciariC0001130015:170:00
C. GlassC0000020013:430:00
M. NietoLW0000100012:300:00
B. LizotteC0003210011:220:00
A. BeauvillierRW0004000010:180:00
M. PetterssonD022105+3025:140:00
E. KarlssonD011301-1022:220:41
K. LetangD000131+3225:400:00
M. GrzelcykD000003-1018:510:00
P. JosephD0001100015:140:00
O. PickeringD0000100012:070:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Nedeljkovic43403.93059:57Win
T. Jarry000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreEDM 3.6, PIT 2.9EDM 3, PIT 5
Total goals6.58
Shots on goalEDM 32.1, PIT 27.5EDM 43, PIT 26
Win chanceEDM 61%PIT won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM C. McDavid3.031.63338%0
PIT S. Crosby2.941.03332%1
EDM L. Draisaitl2.771.36242%2
PIT B. Rust2.720.77330%1
EDM Z. Hyman2.730.77134%0
EDM E. Bouchard2.5100.88116%0
EDM D. Nurse2.430.45011%0
PIT R. Rakell2.410.68127%1
EDM V. Arvidsson2.450.63021%0
EDM M. Ekholm2.210.50112%0
PIT E. Karlsson2.230.69114%0
PIT M. Bunting2.010.62123%0
PIT K. Letang1.910.51012%0
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins1.910.79123%1
EDM J. Skinner1.710.46019%0
EDM B. Kulak1.620.3707%0
PIT J. Puljujarvi1.600.27112%0
PIT C. Glass1.600.35013%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.510.33013%0
PIT D. O'Connor1.520.31214%1
PIT K. Hayes1.520.31113%1
EDM A. Henrique1.410.46020%0
EDM C. Brown1.310.40012%0
PIT A. Beauvillier1.240.24011%0
EDM K. Kapanen1.100.31012%0
PIT M. Grzelcyk1.100.3504%0
PIT B. Lizotte1.130.33014%0
PIT N. Acciari1.010.21013%0
EDM C. Perry1.020.34015%0
PIT M. Pettersson1.010.3124%0
PIT P. Joseph1.010.2005%0
PIT M. Nieto1.000.22010%0
EDM J. Brown0.900.1504%0
EDM T. Emberson0.800.2103%0
EDM M. Janmark0.820.32010%0
PIT O. Pickering0.500.1405%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.