TBL beat EDM 2-1 in overtime, with the chances close: 2.73 expected goals to 2.49. TBL outshot EDM 35 to 25. N. Kucherov had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 3.1. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 24 of 25.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| TBL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
- 1st 1:32EDMT. Frederic0.23 xG
- 3rd 17:28TBLN. Paul0.14 xG
- OT 1:43TBLJ. Guentzel0.16 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
EDM 2.49 xGTBL 2.73 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Draisaitl | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23:14 | 3:59 |
| T. Frederic | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:57 | 0:00 |
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 24:06 | 4:00 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:35 | 4:00 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:06 | 3:46 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:25 | 0:14 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:32 | 0:00 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:38 | 0:00 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:37 | 0:00 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:14 | 0:00 |
| D. Tomasek | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:46 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28:07 | 3:51 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 24:17 | 0:01 |
| B. Kulak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17:38 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:46 | 0:00 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 17 | 14:33 | 0:09 |
| J. Walman | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10:03 | 0:00 |
| A. Regula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8:35 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Pickard | 35 | 33 | 2 | .943 | 61:43 | OT loss |
| S. Skinner | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
TBL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Kucherov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 23:37 | 4:46 |
| J. Guentzel | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20:39 | 4:18 |
| N. Paul | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:21 | 1:53 |
| B. Point | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:24 | 4:07 |
| B. Hagel | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20:04 | 1:50 |
| A. Cirelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:24 | 1:31 |
| Y. Gourde | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:42 | 0:00 |
| O. Bjorkstrand | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 13:48 | 4:18 |
| Z. Girgensons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:46 | 0:00 |
| G. Goncalves | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:58 | 1:14 |
| D. James | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:04 | 0:00 |
| C. Douglas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3:32 | 0:00 |
| D. Raddysh | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 27:38 | 4:34 |
| J. Moser | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 2 | 21:51 | 0:00 |
| E. Lilleberg | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21:32 | 0:00 |
| C. D'Astous | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 22:08 | 1:29 |
| D. Carlile | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:45 | 0:00 |
| S. Santini | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8:56 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Vasilevskiy | 25 | 24 | 1 | .960 | 61:43 | Win |
| J. Johansson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
EDM
TBL
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | EDM 2.9, TBL 3.5 | EDM 1, TBL 2 |
| Total goals | 6.4 | 3 |
| Shots on goal | EDM 27.5, TBL 26.9 | EDM 25, TBL 35 |
| Win chance | TBL 59% | TBL won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL N. Kucherov | 3.1 | 6 | 1.62 | 1 | 38% | 0 |
| EDM C. McDavid | 2.9 | 3 | 1.36 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| TBL J. Guentzel | 2.8 | 4 | 1.14 | 1 | 40% | 1 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.7 | 2 | 0.75 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 2.6 | 1 | 1.18 | 1 | 41% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 2.5 | 4 | 0.64 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| TBL B. Point | 2.4 | 5 | 1.08 | 0 | 40% | 0 |
| TBL B. Hagel | 2.2 | 3 | 0.86 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 2.2 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.0 | 2 | 0.32 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| TBL O. Bjorkstrand | 1.9 | 2 | 0.71 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.8 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| TBL N. Paul | 1.8 | 3 | 0.54 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| EDM J. Walman | 1.8 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TBL A. Cirelli | 1.6 | 4 | 0.67 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| TBL Y. Gourde | 1.5 | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| TBL D. Raddysh | 1.5 | 4 | 0.53 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.4 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.3 | 1 | 0.24 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.3 | 2 | 0.35 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| TBL D. James | 1.2 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| TBL Z. Girgensons | 1.2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| EDM D. Tomasek | 1.1 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 1.1 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 1.0 | 1 | 0.22 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| EDM B. Kulak | 1.0 | 1 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL G. Goncalves | 1.0 | 1 | 0.42 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| TBL J. Moser | 1.0 | 1 | 0.29 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL C. D'Astous | 0.9 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL S. Santini | 0.8 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.7 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| TBL E. Lilleberg | 0.7 | 2 | 0.24 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM A. Regula | 0.7 | 0 | 0.06 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| TBL D. Carlile | 0.6 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL C. Douglas | 0.6 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.6 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.