Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
MIN2
FinalMon, Apr 20, 2026PlayoffsEvery game that night
DAL4

DAL beat MIN 4-2, with the chances close: 2.81 expected goals to 2.98. B. Faber led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). B. Faber had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. J. Oettinger stopped 28 of 30.

Team Stats

MINDAL
30Shots on goal32
2.98Expected goals2.81
56Shot attempts64
195v5 shots on goal25
0/4Power play2/5
35Hits27
16Blocked shots14
14Penalty minutes12
12Giveaways11
4Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

MIN 2.98 xGDAL 2.81 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdDAL goal, 8:58MIN goal, 11:33DAL goal, 4:02DAL goal, 7:09MIN goal, 9:47

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

MIN29 on goal, 2 scored
DAL30 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

MIN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. KaprizovLW011201+2024:436:12
J. Eriksson EkC011451+2221:354:11
M. BoldyLW000510+1024:225:42
R. HartmanRW000111-1219:075:43
M. JohanssonLW0001200016:211:45
V. TarasenkoRW000321-1015:012:45
M. McCarronC000122-1012:520:00
B. BrinkRW000151-1012:271:39
D. YurovRW000130-1010:421:15
M. FolignoLW0002910410:190:00
N. FolignoLW000211-128:370:00
Y. TreninC000030003:020:00
Q. HughesD022100+2028:355:59
B. FaberD202600+2026:421:32
J. BrodinD000004-2017:060:01
J. SpurgeonD000002-1216:490:36
J. MiddletonD0000110013:010:00
Z. BogosianD000000-1211:040:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Wallstedt31283.90359:04Loss
F. Gustavsson000–0:00

DAL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
W. JohnstonC2026100019:215:27
M. DucheneC1121000216:174:55
M. RantanenRW011110-1419:125:27
J. RobertsonLW1015010016:364:55
J. HryckowianC011121-1014:200:50
O. BäckC011010+1011:360:00
S. SteelC0003100016:320:14
A. HyryRW0000210013:150:00
J. BennLW0002200212:470:32
M. BourqueC000130+1012:260:18
R. FaksaC0000100012:230:14
C. BlackwellC000250+109:510:00
N. LundkvistD022001+2015:250:32
M. HeiskanenD011500-2226:065:27
E. LindellD011401-2023:160:50
T. HarleyD000025+1219:520:00
T. MyersD0001440016:280:00
L. BichselD000020+1014:170:14
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Oettinger30282.93360:00Win
C. DeSmith000–0:00

Lines at 5-on-5

MIN

Line 1J. Ek12:27M. Boldy14:31M. Johansson13:01
Line 3B. Brink10:48D. Yurov8:55N. Foligno7:46
Pair 1Q. Hughes19:18B. Faber18:36
Pair 2J. Spurgeon14:35J. Brodin14:54

DAL

Line 2S. Steel12:42A. Hyry12:04J. Benn11:49
Pair 1E. Lindell15:18M. Heiskanen16:00
Pair 2T. Harley16:19N. Lundkvist12:48
Pair 3T. Myers12:34L. Bichsel14:03

From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreMIN 2.9, DAL 3.1MIN 2, DAL 4
Total goals6.06
Shots on goalMIN 26.4, DAL 26.7MIN 30, DAL 32
Win chanceDAL 54%DAL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
DAL J. Robertson3.351.07137%1
MIN K. Kaprizov2.921.02138%0
MIN M. Boldy2.850.83029%0
MIN J. Ek2.440.64123%0
DAL W. Johnston2.460.87234%2
MIN Q. Hughes2.310.95213%0
DAL M. Rantanen2.211.07133%0
MIN R. Hartman2.110.52021%0
DAL M. Bourque1.910.51021%0
DAL M. Duchene1.910.85227%1
MIN B. Faber1.960.43210%2
DAL M. Heiskanen1.850.66111%0
DAL T. Harley1.800.55013%0
MIN V. Tarasenko1.830.51021%0
MIN B. Brink1.310.42015%0
DAL A. Hyry1.300.28013%0
MIN M. Johansson1.310.44013%0
DAL T. Myers1.210.2204%0
MIN Y. Trenin1.200.26011%0
DAL J. Benn1.220.48017%0
MIN M. McCarron1.210.22010%0
DAL N. Lundkvist1.200.2425%0
DAL J. Hryckowian1.210.39116%0
MIN J. Spurgeon1.100.2907%0
DAL S. Steel1.130.39012%0
MIN J. Brodin1.100.2505%0
DAL E. Lindell1.140.3217%0
MIN D. Yurov1.110.33014%0
DAL C. Blackwell1.020.24010%0
MIN M. Foligno1.020.26013%0
MIN N. Foligno1.020.30011%0
MIN J. Middleton0.800.2005%0
DAL L. Bichsel0.800.1907%0
DAL R. Faksa0.800.2508%0
MIN Z. Bogosian0.700.1403%0
DAL O. Bäck0.700.2018%0

Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.