NYI beat PHI 4-0 despite fewer good chances: 1.65 expected goals to 2.38. J. Pageau led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). T. DeAngelo had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 1.8. I. Sorokin stopped 21 of 21.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- 1st 14:29NYIJ. PageauSH0.19 xG
- 2nd 5:41NYIM. Barzal0.10 xG
- 2nd 12:50NYIT. DeAngeloPP0.12 xG
- 3rd 13:38NYIJ. Pageau0.21 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
NYI 1.65 xGPHI 2.38 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
NYI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Barzal | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:29 | 3:32 |
| A. Duclair | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:02 | 3:25 |
| J. Pageau | C | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 13:30 | 0:00 |
| C. Cizikas | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:36 | 0:00 |
| A. Lee | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:54 | 3:13 |
| M. Tsyplakov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 10:04 | 0:00 |
| B. Horvat | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:17 | 2:24 |
| E. Heineman | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:15 | 2:16 |
| M. Shabanov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:51 | 2:14 |
| J. Drouin | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:48 | 3:22 |
| M. Gatcomb | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12:39 | 0:00 |
| K. MacLean | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:12 | 0:00 |
| A. Pelech | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 24:09 | 0:00 |
| T. DeAngelo | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 | +2 | 0 | 22:32 | 3:13 |
| I. George | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:39 | 0:00 |
| M. Schaefer | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:19 | 2:33 |
| S. Mayfield | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 20:51 | 0:00 |
| A. Boqvist | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14:17 | 2:13 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Sorokin | 21 | 21 | 0 | 1.000 | 59:36 | Win |
| D. Rittich | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 19:00 | 1:51 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17:36 | 4:39 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:14 | 0:00 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16:43 | 4:09 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:10 | 4:39 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:24 | 1:21 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 15:01 | 1:21 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:01 | 1:07 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:41 | 4:31 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:45 | 0:00 |
| L. Pederson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:41 | 0:00 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:32 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 22:39 | 0:17 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 22:27 | 4:39 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20:40 | 0:05 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 19:24 | 1:21 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:38 | 0:00 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:43 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Ersson | 23 | 19 | 4 | .826 | 60:00 | Loss |
| A. Kolosov | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
NYI
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | NYI 3.0, PHI 3.0 | NYI 4, PHI 0 |
| Total goals | 5.9 | 4 |
| Shots on goal | NYI 24.9, PHI 27.1 | NYI 23, PHI 21 |
| Win chance | NYI 50% | NYI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI B. Horvat | 2.8 | 1 | 0.79 | 0 | 33% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.5 | 4 | 0.60 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.3 | 1 | 0.84 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 2.2 | 1 | 0.66 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.1 | 4 | 0.59 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| NYI A. Lee | 2.1 | 3 | 0.54 | 1 | 23% | 0 |
| NYI M. Schaefer | 2.1 | 1 | 0.63 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| NYI E. Heineman | 2.1 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.0 | 1 | 0.73 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NYI M. Barzal | 2.0 | 1 | 0.83 | 2 | 22% | 1 |
| NYI T. DeAngelo | 1.8 | 7 | 0.49 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.8 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.8 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.7 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| NYI A. Pelech | 1.4 | 0 | 0.26 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| NYI A. Duclair | 1.4 | 1 | 0.53 | 2 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.4 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.4 | 3 | 0.44 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.4 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.3 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.3 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.2 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI J. Drouin | 1.2 | 3 | 0.58 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NYI M. Shabanov | 1.1 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| NYI J. Pageau | 1.1 | 2 | 0.47 | 2 | 16% | 2 |
| NYI M. Gatcomb | 1.0 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| NYI C. Cizikas | 1.0 | 2 | 0.28 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI L. Pederson | 0.9 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI M. Tsyplakov | 0.9 | 1 | 0.23 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI K. MacLean | 0.8 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NYI S. Mayfield | 0.8 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.8 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 0.7 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| NYI A. Boqvist | 0.7 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NYI I. George | 0.6 | 0 | 0.13 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 15 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.