NYI beat TBL 2-0 despite fewer good chances: 2.21 expected goals to 3.80. TBL outshot NYI 32 to 19. A. Cirelli had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.8. I. Sorokin stopped 32 of 32.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| TBL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- 3rd 12:46NYIC. RitchiePP0.26 xG
- 3rd 19:58NYIC. CizikasEN0.45 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
NYI 2.21 xGTBL 3.80 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
NYI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Cizikas | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 14:04 | 0:00 |
| A. Lee | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 13:45 | 1:12 |
| C. Ritchie | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:41 | 1:12 |
| B. Horvat | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 22:13 | 3:20 |
| S. Holmstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:45 | 1:14 |
| E. Heineman | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 18:16 | 1:11 |
| M. Barzal | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 16:38 | 3:15 |
| M. Shabanov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15:44 | 3:17 |
| A. Duclair | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:13 | 3:18 |
| K. MacLean | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:56 | 0:00 |
| M. Tsyplakov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:35 | 0:00 |
| M. Gatcomb | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:29 | 0:00 |
| T. DeAngelo | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:25 | 1:15 |
| M. Schaefer | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 24:27 | 3:20 |
| R. Pulock | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22:38 | 0:00 |
| A. Pelech | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21:56 | 0:06 |
| S. Mayfield | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 18:39 | 0:00 |
| A. Boqvist | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:46 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Sorokin | 32 | 32 | 0 | 1.000 | 59:50 | Win |
| D. Rittich | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
TBL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Guentzel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 22:39 | 2:12 |
| B. Hagel | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 4 | 22:04 | 2:11 |
| A. Cirelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 21:33 | 2:09 |
| N. Paul | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:57 | 2:09 |
| Y. Gourde | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:36 | 0:00 |
| Z. Girgensons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:21 | 0:00 |
| O. Bjorkstrand | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:43 | 1:49 |
| P. Holmberg | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:43 | 0:00 |
| D. James | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:06 | 1:51 |
| G. Goncalves | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:32 | 1:51 |
| J. Finley | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:50 | 1:45 |
| C. Douglas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5:55 | 0:00 |
| D. Raddysh | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 23:28 | 1:53 |
| C. D'Astous | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 22:22 | 2:07 |
| J. Moser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19:11 | 0:00 |
| E. Lilleberg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18:15 | 0:00 |
| M. Crozier | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:44 | 0:00 |
| V. Hedman | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16:43 | 0:03 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Johansson | 18 | 17 | 1 | .944 | 56:46 | Loss |
| B. Halverson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
NYI
TBL
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | NYI 2.7, TBL 3.2 | NYI 2, TBL 0 |
| Total goals | 5.9 | 2 |
| Shots on goal | NYI 28.0, TBL 27.8 | NYI 19, TBL 32 |
| Win chance | TBL 58% | NYI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI B. Horvat | 3.1 | 1 | 0.75 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| TBL J. Guentzel | 3.0 | 0 | 1.10 | 0 | 40% | 0 |
| NYI M. Barzal | 2.7 | 0 | 0.83 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NYI M. Schaefer | 2.6 | 4 | 0.56 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| TBL B. Hagel | 2.6 | 5 | 0.92 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| NYI A. Lee | 2.6 | 0 | 0.52 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| TBL D. Raddysh | 2.2 | 1 | 0.71 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| TBL N. Paul | 2.0 | 3 | 0.57 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| TBL O. Bjorkstrand | 1.9 | 1 | 0.60 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| TBL A. Cirelli | 1.8 | 6 | 0.64 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| TBL V. Hedman | 1.8 | 0 | 0.70 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| NYI T. DeAngelo | 1.7 | 0 | 0.37 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI E. Heineman | 1.7 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| NYI A. Pelech | 1.6 | 1 | 0.24 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NYI M. Shabanov | 1.6 | 2 | 0.47 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| TBL Y. Gourde | 1.5 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| NYI C. Ritchie | 1.4 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| TBL M. Crozier | 1.3 | 3 | 0.17 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| TBL Z. Girgensons | 1.3 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| NYI R. Pulock | 1.3 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NYI A. Duclair | 1.2 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| TBL J. Moser | 1.2 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| NYI S. Holmstrom | 1.2 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| TBL P. Holmberg | 1.1 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| NYI M. Gatcomb | 1.1 | 2 | 0.24 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| TBL D. James | 1.1 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| TBL C. D'Astous | 1.0 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| NYI M. Tsyplakov | 0.9 | 2 | 0.22 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI S. Mayfield | 0.9 | 1 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NYI C. Cizikas | 0.8 | 1 | 0.18 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| TBL E. Lilleberg | 0.8 | 3 | 0.27 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NYI A. Boqvist | 0.8 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NYI K. MacLean | 0.8 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL J. Finley | 0.8 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| TBL G. Goncalves | 0.7 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TBL C. Douglas | 0.5 | 2 | 0.10 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.