Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
OTT2
FinalSat, Dec 28, 2024Every game that night
WPG4

WPG beat OTT 4-2, with the chances close: 3.44 expected goals to 2.77. OTT outshot WPG 35 to 23. N. Ehlers led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). N. Ehlers had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.2. C. Hellebuyck stopped 33 of 35.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
OTT1102
WPG0224
  1. 1st 10:40OTTT. StützlePP0.10 xG
  2. 2nd 4:03OTTR. GreigPP0.12 xG
  3. 2nd 12:46WPGK. Connor0.19 xG
  4. 2nd 15:01WPGM. Scheifele0.08 xG
  5. 3rd 9:47WPGG. VilardiPP0.26 xG
  6. 3rd 11:19WPGN. Ehlers0.14 xG

Team Stats

OTTWPG
35Shots on goal23
2.77Expected goals3.44
73Shot attempts54
235v5 shots on goal18
2/4Power play1/3
21Hits15
13Blocked shots18
4Penalty minutes8
4Giveaways9
5Takeaways8

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

OTT 2.77 xGWPG 3.44 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdOTT goal, 10:40OTT goal, 4:03WPG goal, 12:46WPG goal, 15:01WPG goal, 9:47WPG goal, 11:19

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

OTT35 on goal, 2 scored
WPG23 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

OTT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. StützleC1014210021:265:07
R. GreigC101330-2019:501:52
B. TkachukLW0117400019:425:11
C. GirouxRW0111000018:372:02
D. BathersonRW011020-1017:394:45
J. NorrisC000130-1020:454:54
S. PintoC000511-2017:081:48
N. CousinsC000111-2016:420:00
A. GaudetteRW0001000011:271:44
N. GregorLW0001200010:370:00
Z. OstapchukC000010007:470:00
C. ReinhardtLW000020-105:300:00
T. ChabotD011401-1026:572:02
J. SandersonD000102-1024:514:52
N. JensenD000201-1220:360:03
T. HamonicD0003020018:010:00
T. KlevenD000102-1210:320:00
J. Bernard-DockerD000002-2010:090:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
M. Sogaard23194.82657:04Loss
L. Meriläinen000–0:00

WPG Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. EhlersLW123601+2014:203:14
M. ScheifeleC112110+2020:093:07
K. ConnorLW112201+1019:343:09
G. VilardiC101302+1418:083:15
A. LowryC0002020017:200:00
M. AppletonC0001030015:550:00
N. NiederreiterRW0000210015:351:00
V. NamestnikovC000110+1014:101:08
C. PerfettiC000030+2012:581:06
A. IafalloLW0000110011:580:44
M. BarronC000010008:270:00
R. KupariC000111007:300:00
J. MorrisseyD011000+1025:482:37
L. StanleyD0110130019:140:00
C. MillerD011300+2013:360:17
N. PionkD000011+1222:581:38
D. DeMeloD000232+1022:040:00
V. HeinolaD000100+1212:590:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Hellebuyck35332.94360:00Win
E. Comrie000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamNoah Gregor WPG Faces OTT, his team until Mar 20251 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreOTT 2.9, WPG 3.4OTT 2, WPG 4
Total goals6.36
Shots on goalOTT 29.8, WPG 28.7OTT 35, WPG 23
Win chanceWPG 59%WPG won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
OTT B. Tkachuk3.670.76130%0
WPG K. Connor3.021.05238%1
WPG N. Ehlers2.260.72325%1
OTT D. Batherson2.200.71124%0
OTT T. Chabot2.140.4719%0
WPG M. Scheifele2.111.01236%1
OTT T. Stützle2.140.81124%1
OTT J. Norris2.010.56028%0
OTT S. Pinto2.050.42019%0
WPG G. Vilardi2.030.79132%1
WPG J. Morrissey1.900.86114%0
WPG C. Perfetti1.800.60020%0
OTT J. Sanderson1.810.4207%0
WPG N. Niederreiter1.800.47022%0
OTT C. Giroux1.810.60121%0
WPG N. Pionk1.500.5609%0
OTT N. Cousins1.510.28011%0
WPG M. Appleton1.410.40014%0
WPG A. Lowry1.420.47018%0
OTT N. Gregor1.410.19010%0
OTT T. Hamonic1.330.1605%0
OTT R. Greig1.230.30113%1
WPG C. Miller1.230.2517%0
WPG V. Namestnikov1.210.49018%0
OTT A. Gaudette1.210.27014%0
WPG A. Iafallo1.100.34014%0
OTT N. Jensen1.120.2704%0
WPG M. Barron1.100.20011%0
OTT C. Reinhardt1.000.2209%0
WPG D. DeMelo0.920.3104%0
WPG V. Heinola0.910.2003%0
WPG L. Stanley0.900.2014%0
OTT T. Kleven0.810.0902%0
WPG R. Kupari0.810.1406%0
OTT J. Bernard-Docker0.600.1203%0
OTT Z. Ostapchuk0.400.1205%0

Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.