CAR beat PHI 4-3 in overtime, and the chances backed it up: 5.70 expected goals to 3.48. CAR outshot PHI 39 to 23. B. Brink led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). J. Blake had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.8. F. Andersen stopped 20 of 23.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| CAR | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
- 1st 19:38PHIO. TippettPP0.50 xG
- 2nd 3:46CARL. Stankoven0.49 xG
- 2nd 6:18PHIB. Brink0.07 xG
- 2nd 9:07CART. Hall0.11 xG
- 2nd 18:30CARJ. Staal0.16 xG
- 3rd 16:00PHIT. Sanheim0.10 xG
- OT 4:43CARS. Jarvis0.14 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 3.48 xGCAR 5.70 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Brink | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:44 | 2:03 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:22 | 2:08 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:09 | 2:10 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:37 | 1:53 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 16:49 | 2:14 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 16:20 | 1:38 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 8:36 | 0:00 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 20:05 | 1:56 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:41 | 0:00 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 13:27 | 2:12 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 10:32 | 0:00 |
| J. Luchanko | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 7:40 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 29:34 | 2:00 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 23:08 | 2:31 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 22:56 | 0:00 |
| E. Zamula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16:46 | 0:00 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14:22 | 0:00 |
| A. Ginning | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:21 | 0:00 |
CAR Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Jarvis | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20:50 | 3:56 |
| S. Aho | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:35 | 3:53 |
| J. Blake | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 19:27 | 3:44 |
| L. Stankoven | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:19 | 4:01 |
| J. Staal | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:50 | 0:05 |
| J. Martinook | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:42 | 0:00 |
| T. Hall | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:28 | 4:03 |
| E. Robinson | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:56 | 0:00 |
| N. Ehlers | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:59 | 4:23 |
| A. Svechnikov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:56 | 3:51 |
| W. Carrier | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:22 | 0:00 |
| J. Kotkaniemi | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:26 | 0:21 |
| S. Gostisbehere | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 20:25 | 4:56 |
| A. Nikishin | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:48 | 0:00 |
| K. Miller | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 25:56 | 3:37 |
| S. Walker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 23:00 | 3:04 |
| J. Chatfield | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 4 | 19:15 | 0:00 |
| J. Slavin | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:48 | 0:06 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Andersen | 23 | 20 | 3 | .870 | 64:41 | Win |
| B. Bussi | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
CAR
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.4, CAR 3.5 | PHI 3, CAR 4 |
| Total goals | 5.9 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 22.6, CAR 30.0 | PHI 23, CAR 39 |
| Win chance | CAR 68% | CAR won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR N. Ehlers | 2.8 | 6 | 0.94 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| CAR S. Aho | 2.7 | 1 | 1.12 | 1 | 37% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.6 | 0 | 0.75 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| CAR S. Jarvis | 2.6 | 5 | 0.97 | 1 | 33% | 1 |
| CAR A. Svechnikov | 2.5 | 1 | 0.89 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 2.2 | 1 | 0.57 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.1 | 2 | 0.45 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.1 | 2 | 0.75 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| CAR L. Stankoven | 2.1 | 2 | 0.52 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| CAR S. Walker | 1.9 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 1.8 | 3 | 0.52 | 1 | 23% | 0 |
| CAR J. Blake | 1.8 | 6 | 0.52 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| CAR T. Hall | 1.7 | 2 | 0.55 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| CAR J. Slavin | 1.7 | 2 | 0.45 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 1.6 | 3 | 0.55 | 1 | 19% | 0 |
| CAR S. Gostisbehere | 1.6 | 1 | 0.70 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| CAR J. Staal | 1.4 | 3 | 0.45 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.4 | 3 | 0.43 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| CAR J. Martinook | 1.4 | 2 | 0.49 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| CAR K. Miller | 1.4 | 1 | 0.46 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| CAR J. Chatfield | 1.4 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.3 | 4 | 0.51 | 2 | 16% | 1 |
| CAR W. Carrier | 1.3 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 2 | 0.32 | 1 | 7% | 1 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.2 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| CAR E. Robinson | 1.2 | 2 | 0.32 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| CAR J. Kotkaniemi | 1.2 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.1 | 2 | 0.22 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 1.0 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| CAR A. Nikishin | 0.9 | 2 | 0.33 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 0.9 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI A. Ginning | 0.6 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.5 | 0 | 0.07 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| PHI E. Zamula | 0.5 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.5 | 0 | 0.12 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.