CBJ beat PHI 5-3, with the chances close: 3.62 expected goals to 3.22. T. Konecny scored three for PHI. T. Zegras had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.0. E. Merzlikins stopped 24 of 27.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| CBJ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
- 1st 0:38CBJC. Coyle0.18 xG
- 1st 9:03PHIT. Konecny0.14 xG
- 1st 19:40CBJK. Marchenko0.15 xG
- 2nd 1:58CBJE. Gudbranson0.04 xG
- 3rd 4:08PHIT. Konecny0.12 xG
- 3rd 15:14PHIT. Konecny0.24 xG
- 3rd 16:32CBJS. Monahan0.14 xG
- 3rd 18:54CBJM. OlivierEN0.91 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 3.22 xGCBJ 3.62 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Konecny | RW | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 21:30 | 4:19 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 21:59 | 4:00 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 21:20 | 4:19 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:08 | 2:10 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 15:52 | 4:01 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 15:41 | 0:06 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 15:31 | 2:44 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:50 | 1:23 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:12 | 2:14 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:16 | 0:06 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9:54 | 0:06 |
| L. Pederson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6:48 | 0:00 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 26:46 | 3:54 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 23:53 | 2:19 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -3 | 2 | 23:36 | 0:06 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:18 | 0:00 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:11 | 0:00 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1:01 | 0:00 |
CBJ Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Coyle | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:35 | 3:02 |
| C. Sillinger | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 14:10 | 0:07 |
| M. Olivier | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 14:04 | 0:00 |
| S. Monahan | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:59 | 0:59 |
| K. Marchenko | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:47 | 3:24 |
| A. Fantilli | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:09 | 3:08 |
| K. Johnson | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 12:36 | 1:00 |
| B. Jenner | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:46 | 0:00 |
| M. Marchment | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 16:46 | 3:01 |
| I. Lundestrom | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:00 | 0:00 |
| D. Voronkov | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8:38 | 0:57 |
| M. Wood | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7:30 | 0:00 |
| Z. Werenski | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:58 | 3:24 |
| D. Severson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 22:18 | 0:49 |
| E. Gudbranson | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 18:35 | 0:00 |
| I. Provorov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:22 | 0:44 |
| D. Mateychuk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:57 | 0:00 |
| E. Zamula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 13:38 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Merzlikins | 27 | 24 | 3 | .889 | 60:00 | Win |
| J. Greaves | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
CBJ
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 3.1, CBJ 3.5 | PHI 3, CBJ 5 |
| Total goals | 6.6 | 8 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 27.4, CBJ 28.0 | PHI 27, CBJ 31 |
| Win chance | CBJ 56% | CBJ won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBJ Z. Werenski | 3.2 | 2 | 1.04 | 2 | 23% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.7 | 2 | 0.64 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| CBJ A. Fantilli | 2.6 | 4 | 0.80 | 1 | 30% | 0 |
| CBJ K. Marchenko | 2.5 | 3 | 0.85 | 1 | 31% | 1 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.3 | 3 | 0.64 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.2 | 3 | 0.82 | 3 | 27% | 3 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 2.2 | 3 | 0.66 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| CBJ B. Jenner | 2.1 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.0 | 6 | 0.71 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| CBJ M. Marchment | 1.9 | 1 | 0.74 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.8 | 2 | 0.51 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.7 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.7 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| CBJ C. Coyle | 1.6 | 1 | 0.67 | 2 | 23% | 1 |
| CBJ I. Provorov | 1.6 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| CBJ C. Sillinger | 1.6 | 1 | 0.42 | 2 | 14% | 0 |
| CBJ K. Johnson | 1.5 | 2 | 0.61 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| CBJ S. Monahan | 1.5 | 1 | 0.65 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| CBJ D. Severson | 1.5 | 2 | 0.47 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.5 | 4 | 0.41 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| CBJ M. Wood | 1.4 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.4 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| CBJ D. Voronkov | 1.4 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.3 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.3 | 1 | 0.47 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 0 | 0.37 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| CBJ M. Olivier | 1.3 | 2 | 0.38 | 2 | 16% | 1 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.2 | 3 | 0.36 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| CBJ E. Gudbranson | 1.1 | 2 | 0.28 | 1 | 6% | 1 |
| CBJ D. Mateychuk | 0.9 | 2 | 0.37 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI L. Pederson | 0.9 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.8 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| CBJ I. Lundestrom | 0.7 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.6 | 0 | 0.14 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CBJ E. Zamula | 0.5 | 2 | 0.19 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.