PHI beat EDM 5-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.61 expected goals to 2.31. C. McDavid led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). S. Couturier had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.7. D. Vladar stopped 23 of 25.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| EDM | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 7:16PHID. Barkey0.23 xG
- 1st 10:31PHIT. Sanheim0.08 xG
- 1st 14:38PHIB. Brink0.07 xG
- 1st 16:08EDMC. McDavid0.12 xG
- 2nd 9:54EDME. BouchardPP0.13 xG
- 3rd 9:09PHIN. Seeler0.01 xG
- 3rd 18:50PHIO. TippettEN0.83 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 3.61 xGEDM 2.31 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O. Tippett | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:58 | 1:42 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:37 | 0:14 |
| B. Brink | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 14:36 | 1:02 |
| D. Barkey | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 14:11 | 1:44 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 13:37 | 1:45 |
| R. Abols | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 10:41 | 0:00 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20:29 | 2:26 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:11 | 2:15 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:24 | 2:02 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:57 | 1:20 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:54 | 0:13 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | +1 | 7 | 10:03 | 0:00 |
| N. Seeler | D | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +2 | 0 | 18:23 | 0:00 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 24:36 | 2:13 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | +1 | 0 | 23:20 | 1:12 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 19:16 | 1:34 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:02 | 0:05 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:52 | 0:13 |
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 23:17 | 2:37 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:21 | 2:37 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 21:17 | 2:37 |
| L. Draisaitl | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 21:13 | 2:37 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 16:18 | 0:30 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 16:08 | 0:00 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12:35 | 0:30 |
| I. Howard | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:52 | 0:00 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:57 | 0:00 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 10:16 | 0:30 |
| Q. Hutson | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 9:17 | 0:00 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:39 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 27:39 | 2:37 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 25:14 | 0:30 |
| S. Stastney | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -3 | 0 | 18:01 | 0:00 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 5 | 16:56 | 0:30 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:30 | 0:00 |
| A. Regula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -1 | 2 | 14:21 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Pickard | 28 | 24 | 4 | .857 | 57:09 | Loss |
| C. Ingram | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
EDM
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.8, EDM 3.4 | PHI 5, EDM 2 |
| Total goals | 6.2 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 25.9, EDM 27.8 | PHI 29, EDM 25 |
| Win chance | EDM 59% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.2 | 6 | 1.65 | 2 | 40% | 1 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 2.9 | 3 | 0.90 | 0 | 40% | 0 |
| EDM L. Draisaitl | 2.8 | 1 | 1.42 | 0 | 44% | 0 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.7 | 4 | 1.07 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.3 | 2 | 0.55 | 2 | 23% | 1 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.2 | 2 | 0.83 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.1 | 2 | 0.78 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.0 | 1 | 0.58 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 1.9 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.9 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 1.9 | 4 | 0.85 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.8 | 3 | 0.50 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 1.8 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.7 | 1 | 0.53 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.7 | 6 | 0.48 | 2 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.5 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.5 | 2 | 0.47 | 1 | 16% | 1 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.4 | 2 | 0.24 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.3 | 1 | 0.34 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.2 | 2 | 0.27 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.2 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.2 | 2 | 0.33 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.1 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.1 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.1 | 2 | 0.17 | 2 | 3% | 1 |
| EDM I. Howard | 1.0 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.0 | 2 | 0.30 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM S. Stastney | 0.9 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 0.9 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 0.8 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM Q. Hutson | 0.8 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.8 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM A. Regula | 0.7 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.7 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.7 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.