PHI beat LAK 4-3 in a shootout, with the chances close: 2.45 expected goals to 2.40. A. Panarin led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). S. Ersson stopped 22 of 25.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | SO | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| LAK | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
- 1st 19:31LAKQ. Byfield0.12 xG
- 2nd 0:26PHIT. Konecny0.08 xG
- 2nd 0:47LAKA. Kopitar0.34 xG
- 2nd 4:12PHIN. Cates0.03 xG
- 2nd 6:59PHIT. Sanheim0.04 xG
- 3rd 10:28LAKA. PanarinPP0.04 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 2.45 xGLAK 2.40 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Cates | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 2 | 20:27 | 2:00 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 17:04 | 2:00 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 20:15 | 2:04 |
| A. Bump | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 11:34 | 1:58 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22:43 | 1:58 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 2 | 21:17 | 1:53 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:22 | 1:45 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 15:00 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 11:22 | 0:00 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:44 | 0:00 |
| G. Wilson | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:03 | 0:00 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 21:57 | 2:06 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 26:54 | 0:23 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 23:03 | 1:52 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 22:53 | 1:59 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15:03 | 0:02 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:19 | 0:00 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6:21 | 0:00 |
LAK Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Panarin | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 26:25 | 7:39 |
| A. Kopitar | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:58 | 5:09 |
| A. Laferriere | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:59 | 4:47 |
| Q. Byfield | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:29 | 2:43 |
| T. Moore | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:08 | 2:49 |
| S. Laughton | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:36 | 2:42 |
| A. Kempe | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:02 | 4:55 |
| J. Wright | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:31 | 0:00 |
| A. Turcotte | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:08 | 0:00 |
| J. Malott | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8:28 | 0:02 |
| S. Helenius | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8:19 | 0:03 |
| T. Ward | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:12 | 0:00 |
| B. Clarke | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 23:45 | 5:05 |
| D. Doughty | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 22:49 | 2:18 |
| M. Anderson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -2 | 0 | 20:24 | 0:00 |
| J. Edmundson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 18:35 | 0:00 |
| C. Ceci | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16:41 | 0:00 |
| B. Dumoulin | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:16 | 0:03 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Kuemper | 20 | 17 | 3 | .850 | 64:15 | OT loss |
| A. Forsberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
LAK
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.5, LAK 3.2 | PHI 4, LAK 3 |
| Total goals | 5.6 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 23.6, LAK 26.7 | PHI 20, LAK 25 |
| Win chance | LAK 63% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.8 | 3 | 0.62 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| LAK A. Panarin | 2.7 | 4 | 1.29 | 2 | 36% | 1 |
| LAK A. Kempe | 2.7 | 3 | 1.04 | 0 | 37% | 0 |
| LAK A. Laferriere | 2.7 | 3 | 0.65 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.3 | 1 | 0.88 | 1 | 28% | 1 |
| LAK T. Moore | 2.3 | 3 | 0.62 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| LAK Q. Byfield | 2.0 | 1 | 0.68 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.0 | 1 | 0.69 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.0 | 1 | 0.55 | 2 | 20% | 0 |
| LAK B. Clarke | 1.9 | 1 | 0.59 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.8 | 2 | 0.56 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.5 | 0 | 0.24 | 2 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI A. Bump | 1.4 | 1 | 0.42 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| LAK A. Kopitar | 1.4 | 2 | 0.85 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| LAK S. Laughton | 1.4 | 2 | 0.45 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.4 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| LAK D. Doughty | 1.3 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.3 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.3 | 2 | 0.41 | 2 | 14% | 1 |
| LAK J. Wright | 1.2 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.2 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.1 | 1 | 0.34 | 1 | 7% | 1 |
| LAK T. Ward | 1.1 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| LAK A. Turcotte | 1.0 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| LAK J. Edmundson | 1.0 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 0.9 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| LAK J. Malott | 0.9 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| LAK M. Anderson | 0.9 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| LAK S. Helenius | 0.8 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| LAK C. Ceci | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| LAK B. Dumoulin | 0.7 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.7 | 2 | 0.16 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.6 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.5 | 1 | 0.10 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 0.5 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 27 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.