PHI beat NYI 4-3 in a shootout despite fewer good chances: 2.03 expected goals to 4.01. NYI outshot PHI 31 to 21. M. Schaefer led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). B. Horvat had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.9. S. Ersson stopped 28 of 31.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | SO | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| NYI | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
- 1st 8:30PHIT. Foerster0.09 xG
- 1st 8:52PHIS. Couturier0.13 xG
- 2nd 1:55PHIT. ZegrasPP0.05 xG
- 2nd 5:42NYIE. Heineman0.11 xG
- 2nd 8:11NYIM. Schaefer0.06 xG
- 2nd 19:13NYIA. LeePP0.13 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 2.03 xGNYI 4.01 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Zegras | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:19 | 1:50 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 2 | 17:53 | 1:16 |
| S. Couturier | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:36 | 0:58 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 4 | 15:56 | 2:11 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 17:57 | 1:38 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:37 | 1:24 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:36 | 0:00 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:05 | 1:54 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 12:33 | 0:00 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:17 | 1:54 |
| R. Abols | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 10:16 | 0:00 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 9:45 | 0:00 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:01 | 1:03 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26:34 | 2:07 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -1 | 0 | 24:46 | 1:20 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:40 | 0:00 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 16:59 | 0:00 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 14:22 | 0:00 |
NYI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Shabanov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:19 | 5:04 |
| E. Heineman | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:24 | 2:23 |
| A. Lee | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:48 | 5:37 |
| J. Drouin | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:40 | 3:46 |
| A. Duclair | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 10:37 | 0:00 |
| K. Palmieri | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:25 | 2:33 |
| B. Horvat | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 24:41 | 7:07 |
| M. Barzal | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23:17 | 7:21 |
| S. Holmstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:42 | 1:59 |
| C. Ritchie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:05 | 1:06 |
| C. Cizikas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 10:53 | 0:00 |
| K. MacLean | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 9:56 | 0:00 |
| M. Schaefer | D | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 28:53 | 6:41 |
| R. Pulock | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:45 | 0:10 |
| A. Pelech | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 23:28 | 0:24 |
| T. DeAngelo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 17:20 | 2:29 |
| S. Mayfield | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:43 | 0:00 |
| T. Mitchell | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:05 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Rittich | 21 | 18 | 3 | .857 | 65:00 | OT loss |
| I. Sorokin | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
NYI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.6, NYI 3.2 | PHI 4, NYI 3 |
| Total goals | 5.7 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 24.9, NYI 28.2 | PHI 21, NYI 31 |
| Win chance | NYI 60% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI B. Horvat | 2.9 | 6 | 0.89 | 0 | 35% | 0 |
| NYI M. Barzal | 2.8 | 2 | 1.06 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| NYI M. Schaefer | 2.7 | 1 | 0.68 | 2 | 18% | 1 |
| NYI A. Lee | 2.5 | 2 | 0.63 | 1 | 27% | 1 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.4 | 1 | 0.58 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NYI K. Palmieri | 2.4 | 0 | 0.75 | 1 | 30% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.1 | 0 | 0.77 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.1 | 1 | 0.70 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.0 | 2 | 0.59 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 1.9 | 1 | 0.54 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.7 | 2 | 0.51 | 1 | 15% | 1 |
| NYI T. DeAngelo | 1.7 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.6 | 2 | 0.52 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| NYI E. Heineman | 1.6 | 4 | 0.53 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| NYI J. Drouin | 1.5 | 3 | 0.83 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.5 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.4 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.4 | 1 | 0.47 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| NYI A. Pelech | 1.4 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NYI M. Shabanov | 1.3 | 3 | 0.46 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| NYI C. Ritchie | 1.2 | 3 | 0.26 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NYI R. Pulock | 1.2 | 0 | 0.35 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.1 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.1 | 2 | 0.34 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 1.1 | 3 | 0.20 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.1 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| NYI S. Holmstrom | 1.0 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.0 | 2 | 0.19 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NYI A. Duclair | 1.0 | 1 | 0.33 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.9 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYI S. Mayfield | 0.8 | 2 | 0.19 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| NYI C. Cizikas | 0.8 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYI K. MacLean | 0.7 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.6 | 1 | 0.08 | 0 | 1% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.6 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.