PHI beat NYR 3-2 in overtime, with the chances close: 2.71 expected goals to 2.06. M. Michkov led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). C. Grundstrom had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. S. Ersson stopped 22 of 24.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| NYR | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 9:56NYRS. Carrick0.01 xG
- 2nd 1:23NYRA. Lafrenière0.20 xG
- 2nd 10:25PHIM. MichkovPP0.19 xG
- 3rd 0:39PHIT. Zegras0.15 xG
- OT 2:10PHIM. Michkov0.08 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 2.71 xGNYR 2.06 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Michkov | RW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14:02 | 3:19 |
| T. Zegras | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 20:17 | 6:04 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:12 | 6:05 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:45 | 0:00 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:29 | 4:08 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:24 | 3:17 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 21:00 | 5:12 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:45 | 4:38 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:54 | 3:05 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:08 | 0:00 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:23 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 7 | 9:09 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23:39 | 1:36 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 15:35 | 0:00 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:19 | 4:20 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21:46 | 0:11 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 21:33 | 4:55 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:50 | 0:00 |
NYR Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. Trocheck | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 21:36 | 4:17 |
| W. Cuylle | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 18:05 | 1:11 |
| A. Lafrenière | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 15:25 | 2:22 |
| T. Raddysh | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 9:49 | 0:00 |
| S. Carrick | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 5 | 7:57 | 0:00 |
| M. Zibanejad | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 21:34 | 4:24 |
| J. Miller | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 21:08 | 4:30 |
| N. Laba | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:09 | 0:54 |
| G. Perreault | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:52 | 0:54 |
| C. Sheary | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12:50 | 0:00 |
| B. Brisson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:21 | 1:00 |
| B. Othmann | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 9:23 | 0:00 |
| W. Borgen | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 18:58 | 0:13 |
| A. Fox | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 24:57 | 4:17 |
| V. Gavrikov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 23:10 | 1:05 |
| B. Schneider | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | +2 | 0 | 22:34 | 0:02 |
| M. Robertson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:29 | 0:00 |
| V. Iorio | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:53 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Shesterkin | 24 | 21 | 3 | .875 | 61:42 | OT loss |
| J. Quick | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
NYR
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.7, NYR 3.3 | PHI 3, NYR 2 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 25.6, NYR 24.8 | PHI 24, NYR 24 |
| Win chance | NYR 59% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYR M. Zibanejad | 2.6 | 3 | 1.08 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.5 | 1 | 0.58 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.3 | 1 | 0.90 | 1 | 28% | 0 |
| NYR J. Miller | 2.2 | 0 | 1.14 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.1 | 2 | 0.57 | 2 | 20% | 2 |
| NYR V. Trocheck | 2.1 | 1 | 0.94 | 1 | 29% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.0 | 1 | 0.71 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 2.0 | 0 | 0.64 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| NYR W. Cuylle | 1.8 | 1 | 0.55 | 1 | 23% | 0 |
| NYR A. Fox | 1.8 | 2 | 0.96 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| NYR A. Lafrenière | 1.7 | 1 | 0.66 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.6 | 0 | 0.43 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.6 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NYR V. Gavrikov | 1.5 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.5 | 1 | 0.52 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.4 | 5 | 0.45 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.4 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| NYR G. Perreault | 1.4 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.3 | 3 | 0.37 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NYR B. Schneider | 1.3 | 3 | 0.29 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.3 | 5 | 0.23 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 1 | 0.34 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| NYR C. Sheary | 1.3 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NYR M. Robertson | 1.1 | 4 | 0.31 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.1 | 1 | 0.15 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.0 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| NYR W. Borgen | 1.0 | 2 | 0.23 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| NYR B. Othmann | 1.0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NYR B. Brisson | 0.9 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NYR T. Raddysh | 0.9 | 1 | 0.29 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| NYR S. Carrick | 0.9 | 1 | 0.20 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| NYR N. Laba | 0.8 | 2 | 0.31 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.7 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 0.7 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| NYR V. Iorio | 0.7 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.7 | 1 | 0.17 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.