Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PHI4
FinalSat, Mar 21, 2026Every game that night
SJS1

PHI beat SJS 4-1, and the chances backed it up: 5.05 expected goals to 2.46. C. Dvorak led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). D. Orlov had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.1. D. Vladar stopped 24 of 25.

Team Stats

PHISJS
28Shots on goal25
5.05Expected goals2.46
53Shot attempts57
175v5 shots on goal18
1/5Power play1/4
23Hits19
17Blocked shots10
16Penalty minutes20
11Giveaways14
6Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PHI 5.05 xGSJS 2.46 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdPHI goal, 2:26SJS goal, 13:12PHI goal, 1:47PHI goal, 19:24

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PHI26 on goal, 3 scored
SJS25 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. DvorakC112411+2025:324:27
T. KonecnyRW0113300023:315:31
O. TippettRW101510+3020:112:02
T. ZegrasC011320+1419:536:31
N. CatesLW101402+2518:114:04
M. MichkovRW0112200017:206:25
A. BumpLW0002100013:293:02
G. HathawayRW0001210011:390:00
N. GrebenkinRW000000+108:550:00
C. GrundstromRW000120008:510:00
G. WilsonLW000010058:060:00
T. SanheimD101102+1028:572:08
N. JuulsenD011052+108:530:00
R. RistolainenD000011+2024:395:17
C. YorkD000004+1019:340:00
J. DrysdaleD000103+1017:123:16
N. SeelerD0001210014:250:00
E. AndraeD000000025:240:02
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Vladar25241.96058:25Win
S. Ersson000–0:00

SJS Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. CelebriniC011620-2224:315:49
W. EklundLW011011-2222:055:18
A. WennbergC000100-3024:245:14
W. SmithC000510-2022:495:17
K. SherwoodLW000141-2019:221:33
M. MisaC0002010017:531:38
C. GrafRW000100-1211:390:00
A. GaudetteRW000200-1010:491:37
Z. OstapchukC000131009:480:00
B. GoodrowC000130059:380:00
P. KurashevC000001029:281:06
R. ReavesRW000000050:190:00
D. OrlovD101412-2024:525:18
M. FerraroD0001210220:280:00
S. DickinsonD000011-1017:070:00
S. MukhamadullinD0000010016:510:00
J. KlingbergD0000100016:441:35
N. LeddyD000000-1013:570:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Nedeljkovic26242.92358:43Loss
L. Brossoit000–0:00

Lines at 5-on-5

PHI

Line 1C. Dvorak16:29T. Konecny14:55A. Bump10:27
Line 4G. Wilson8:06G. Hathaway7:56
Pair 1R. Ristolainen16:14T. Sanheim19:35
Pair 2C. York13:52J. Drysdale13:25
Pair 3N. Seeler11:43N. Juulsen8:38

SJS

Line 1W. Smith15:34M. Celebrini16:41A. Wennberg13:23
Line 2W. Eklund13:41M. Misa15:55K. Sherwood14:52
Pair 1D. Orlov17:35J. Klingberg14:26
Pair 3N. Leddy10:42S. Dickinson11:25

From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePHI 3.0, SJS 3.0PHI 4, SJS 1
Total goals6.05
Shots on goalPHI 25.4, SJS 25.5PHI 28, SJS 25
Win chanceSJS 52%PHI won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
SJS M. Celebrini3.361.32137%0
PHI O. Tippett3.150.77132%1
PHI T. Konecny2.531.07134%0
PHI M. Michkov2.220.71125%0
SJS K. Sherwood2.210.55025%0
PHI T. Zegras2.130.82127%0
SJS W. Smith2.150.84028%0
PHI C. Dvorak2.040.70223%1
SJS W. Eklund1.900.63118%0
PHI R. Ristolainen1.600.3506%0
PHI C. Grundstrom1.610.31017%0
PHI A. Bump1.520.54019%0
PHI N. Cates1.540.56119%1
SJS C. Graf1.510.57022%0
PHI J. Drysdale1.410.48011%0
SJS M. Misa1.320.55019%0
PHI C. York1.300.4109%0
PHI T. Sanheim1.310.48111%1
SJS J. Klingberg1.200.41010%0
SJS A. Gaudette1.220.34018%0
SJS P. Kurashev1.200.44015%0
SJS M. Ferraro1.210.2807%0
SJS S. Dickinson1.100.2804%0
SJS A. Wennberg1.110.59017%0
SJS D. Orlov1.140.4419%1
PHI N. Seeler1.010.1804%0
SJS S. Mukhamadullin0.900.2707%0
SJS B. Goodrow0.810.1809%0
PHI G. Hathaway0.810.21011%0
SJS Z. Ostapchuk0.710.1307%0
PHI N. Grebenkin0.700.28010%0
SJS N. Leddy0.600.2404%0
PHI N. Juulsen0.500.1312%0
PHI E. Andrae0.500.1603%0
SJS R. Reaves0.500.1106%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.