PIT beat LAK 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.52 expected goals to 2.74. E. Karlsson led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). Q. Byfield had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.3. A. Silovs stopped 30 of 32.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| LAK | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 4:24LAKW. Foegele0.02 xG
- 1st 9:04LAKK. Fiala0.23 xG
- 2nd 6:37PITE. MalkinPP0.07 xG
- 2nd 7:18PITC. Dewar0.08 xG
- 3rd 6:50PITF. HallanderSH0.14 xG
- 3rd 19:29PITS. CrosbyEN0.53 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PIT 3.52 xGLAK 2.74 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Rust | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 21:11 | 1:47 |
| R. Rakell | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:37 | 1:47 |
| S. Crosby | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 4 | 17:15 | 1:47 |
| E. Malkin | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:01 | 2:03 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:18 | 0:00 |
| C. Dewar | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:09 | 0:00 |
| F. Hallander | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:01 | 0:00 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 15:50 | 1:02 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:15 | 0:11 |
| J. Brazeau | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:56 | 0:46 |
| T. Novak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:38 | 0:46 |
| P. Tomasino | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:21 | 0:51 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 19:52 | 0:00 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:45 | 1:47 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21:25 | 0:16 |
| K. Letang | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 22:00 | 1:02 |
| H. Brunicke | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:50 | 0:00 |
| C. Jones | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17:36 | 0:00 |
LAK Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q. Byfield | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 18:06 | 1:53 |
| J. Armia | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:38 | 1:21 |
| K. Fiala | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:37 | 2:07 |
| T. Moore | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:45 | 0:32 |
| W. Foegele | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:22 | 0:32 |
| A. Kempe | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 18:56 | 2:02 |
| A. Kuzmenko | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:42 | 2:07 |
| P. Danault | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:43 | 1:20 |
| A. Laferriere | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 14:30 | 1:36 |
| A. Turcotte | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:16 | 2:22 |
| S. Helenius | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8:13 | 0:00 |
| J. Malott | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:08 | 0:00 |
| C. Ceci | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:38 | 0:08 |
| D. Doughty | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 21:50 | 1:53 |
| B. Dumoulin | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 19:53 | 0:24 |
| M. Anderson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:11 | 0:08 |
| B. Clarke | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 17:39 | 1:35 |
| J. Edmundson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 17:11 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Forsberg | 25 | 22 | 3 | .880 | 58:53 | Loss |
| P. Copley | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PIT
LAK
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PIT 2.8, LAK 3.4 | PIT 4, LAK 2 |
| Total goals | 6.2 | 6 |
| Shots on goal | PIT 26.4, LAK 29.9 | PIT 26, LAK 32 |
| Win chance | LAK 60% | PIT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAK K. Fiala | 3.3 | 2 | 0.96 | 1 | 34% | 1 |
| LAK A. Kempe | 3.2 | 5 | 1.06 | 0 | 38% | 0 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.5 | 5 | 0.75 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| LAK W. Foegele | 2.4 | 5 | 0.55 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.4 | 1 | 0.93 | 1 | 29% | 1 |
| LAK T. Moore | 2.3 | 0 | 0.61 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| LAK Q. Byfield | 2.3 | 6 | 0.85 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| LAK A. Laferriere | 2.3 | 3 | 0.49 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PIT R. Rakell | 2.2 | 1 | 0.65 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.0 | 1 | 0.52 | 2 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 1.8 | 2 | 0.67 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| LAK A. Kuzmenko | 1.8 | 0 | 0.82 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| PIT K. Letang | 1.8 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| LAK P. Danault | 1.7 | 0 | 0.70 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| LAK B. Clarke | 1.6 | 2 | 0.43 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| LAK D. Doughty | 1.6 | 4 | 0.61 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT P. Tomasino | 1.4 | 0 | 0.33 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.3 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.3 | 3 | 0.47 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| LAK J. Armia | 1.3 | 1 | 0.37 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.2 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| LAK J. Edmundson | 1.1 | 2 | 0.24 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| LAK M. Anderson | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PIT J. Brazeau | 1.1 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| LAK C. Ceci | 1.0 | 0 | 0.25 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| LAK B. Dumoulin | 1.0 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 1.0 | 3 | 0.31 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 0.9 | 1 | 0.15 | 2 | 2% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 0.9 | 3 | 0.17 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| PIT F. Hallander | 0.8 | 2 | 0.21 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| LAK A. Turcotte | 0.8 | 1 | 0.24 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PIT C. Jones | 0.8 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| LAK J. Malott | 0.7 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.7 | 0 | 0.15 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| LAK S. Helenius | 0.4 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 15 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.