Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PIT3
FinalSun, Oct 20, 2024Every game that night
WPG6

WPG beat PIT 6-3, with the chances close: 4.70 expected goals to 4.50. L. Eller led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). L. Eller had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.6. E. Comrie stopped 39 of 42.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
PIT0213
WPG0336
  1. 2nd 1:30PITK. HayesPP0.16 xG
  2. 2nd 5:21PITL. Eller0.40 xG
  3. 2nd 12:18WPGK. Connor0.19 xG
  4. 2nd 17:36WPGM. Scheifele0.27 xG
  5. 2nd 19:29WPGV. Namestnikov0.14 xG
  6. 3rd 1:39PITL. Eller0.03 xG
  7. 3rd 4:20WPGA. Lowry0.23 xG
  8. 3rd 7:41WPGM. Appleton0.01 xG
  9. 3rd 17:30WPGN. NiederreiterEN0.94 xG

Team Stats

PITWPG
42Shots on goal37
4.50Expected goals4.70
86Shot attempts62
385v5 shots on goal33
1/1Power play0/2
18Hits21
11Blocked shots25
6Penalty minutes4
15Giveaways24
3Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PIT 4.50 xGWPG 4.70 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdPIT goal, 1:30PIT goal, 5:21WPG goal, 12:18WPG goal, 17:36WPG goal, 19:29PIT goal, 1:39WPG goal, 4:20WPG goal, 7:41WPG goal, 17:30

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PIT42 on goal, 3 scored
WPG37 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
L. EllerC202600+1015:190:41
R. RakellRW011132-2015:251:00
C. GlassC011301+2015:180:00
J. PuljujarviRW011230-1011:260:37
K. HayesRW101210-109:540:32
S. CrosbyC000500-3020:221:10
D. O'ConnorLW000400-2217:500:00
B. RustRW000000-3217:410:51
E. MalkinC000200-3016:061:19
A. BeauvillierRW000301+2013:400:00
N. AcciariC000141-1013:170:00
V. PuustinenRW000002-109:540:00
E. KarlssonD011100-1022:051:14
K. LetangD000321-3022:361:10
M. PetterssonD0001200221:330:00
M. GrzelcykD000411-2021:100:41
R. GravesD000220-1016:570:00
R. SheaD000202-1015:110:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Nedeljkovic36315.86159:21Loss
J. Blomqvist000–0:00

WPG Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. AppletonC112303+3016:061:06
N. EhlersLW022300+1012:570:58
M. ScheifeleC101201+1020:361:07
K. ConnorLW101401+2019:200:56
N. NiederreiterRW101623+3016:201:40
A. LowryC101220+3215:221:05
V. NamestnikovC101111+1014:070:42
G. VilardiC000100+1016:401:05
C. PerfettiC0001120013:330:46
M. BarronC000230-1011:140:12
A. IafalloLW000102-1010:500:50
D. GustafssonC000200-1010:210:00
J. MorrisseyD022115+2022:091:55
C. MillerD022240+1215:240:00
D. DeMeloD011011+2021:511:13
N. PionkD011233+1021:201:00
L. StanleyD011203+1016:520:00
D. SambergD000230+1021:140:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Comrie42393.92959:53Win
C. Hellebuyck000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePIT 2.9, WPG 3.4PIT 3, WPG 6
Total goals6.39
Shots on goalPIT 31.7, WPG 31.7PIT 42, WPG 37
Win chanceWPG 57%WPG won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
WPG K. Connor3.341.01138%1
PIT B. Rust3.000.71028%0
PIT S. Crosby2.950.97031%0
WPG N. Ehlers2.730.79226%0
PIT E. Malkin2.420.82026%0
WPG G. Vilardi2.310.81032%0
WPG J. Morrissey2.310.92215%0
WPG M. Scheifele2.221.04135%1
PIT E. Karlsson2.210.62113%0
PIT R. Rakell2.210.49120%0
WPG N. Niederreiter2.060.48122%1
PIT D. O'Connor1.840.37017%0
WPG C. Perfetti1.810.54019%0
PIT K. Letang1.730.49010%0
PIT A. Beauvillier1.730.30013%0
PIT L. Eller1.660.32214%2
WPG N. Pionk1.620.4817%0
PIT J. Puljujarvi1.520.24110%0
PIT K. Hayes1.520.28111%1
WPG M. Appleton1.430.40214%1
PIT C. Glass1.430.26111%0
WPG A. Lowry1.420.43116%1
PIT V. Puustinen1.300.2808%0
WPG C. Miller1.320.2426%0
WPG M. Barron1.220.26011%0
PIT M. Pettersson1.210.3004%0
WPG A. Iafallo1.110.34013%0
WPG V. Namestnikov1.110.43114%1
WPG D. Samberg1.120.2604%0
PIT M. Grzelcyk1.140.2304%0
WPG D. DeMelo1.000.3715%0
PIT N. Acciari0.910.17010%0
WPG L. Stanley0.920.1613%0
PIT R. Graves0.920.1604%0
WPG D. Gustafsson0.820.1807%0
PIT R. Shea0.520.0603%0

Shots on goal: 16 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.6 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.