Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
SEA6
FinalTue, Mar 18, 2025Every game that night
CHI2

SEA beat CHI 6-2, with the chances close: 3.00 expected goals to 2.31. A. Larsson led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). N. Foligno had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. J. Daccord stopped 27 of 29.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
SEA1416
CHI2002
  1. 1st 3:46CHIC. BedardPP0.05 xG
  2. 1st 17:13CHIT. Bertuzzi0.05 xG
  3. 1st 17:44SEAA. Larsson0.06 xG
  4. 2nd 5:55SEAJ. Eberle0.15 xG
  5. 2nd 6:21SEAJ. McCann0.10 xG
  6. 2nd 12:53SEAM. Beniers0.17 xG
  7. 2nd 15:13SEAS. Wright0.38 xG
  8. 3rd 6:55SEAS. Wright0.16 xG

Team Stats

SEACHI
30Shots on goal29
3.00Expected goals2.31
51Shot attempts51
305v5 shots on goal26
0/1Power play1/1
16Hits17
10Blocked shots10
7Penalty minutes7
13Giveaways16
4Takeaways3

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

SEA 3.00 xGCHI 2.31 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdCHI goal, 3:46CHI goal, 17:13SEA goal, 17:44SEA goal, 5:55SEA goal, 6:21SEA goal, 12:53SEA goal, 15:13SEA goal, 6:55

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

SEA29 on goal, 6 scored
CHI29 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

SEA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
S. WrightC202300+2017:421:02
A. BurakovskyLW022100+2014:490:00
M. BeniersC112200+1014:490:54
C. StephensonC011102+1017:070:56
J. McCannLW101210+2016:201:06
J. SchwartzLW011301+1016:100:57
J. EberleRW101200+1014:431:03
M. EyssimontC011520+1212:260:00
K. KakkoRW000011+1017:051:04
E. TolvanenRW000211+1015:500:00
J. NymanRW000110+1013:570:58
J. HaydenC000212+1510:250:00
A. LarssonD123251+2022:360:00
V. DunnD011201+2021:101:29
J. OleksiakD011001+2020:440:00
B. MontourD011100+2019:580:31
R. EvansD000140+1018:310:00
J. MahuraD000000+1015:070:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Daccord29272.93160:00Win
P. Grubauer000–0:00

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. BertuzziLW112200-1015:550:31
C. BedardC101400-3015:290:31
L. ReichelLW011110-1014:480:00
R. DonatoC000211-3016:410:31
N. FolignoLW000610-1015:400:00
J. DickinsonC000001-1015:160:00
L. SlaggertLW0003000014:320:00
T. TeravainenC000000-1014:310:31
F. NazarC000000-2014:160:00
I. MikheyevRW000300-1014:120:00
C. DachC0002000013:350:00
P. MaroonLW000150-1513:200:00
A. VlasicD011003-2021:370:00
A. LevshunovD011001-2019:560:31
C. MurphyD000363-2021:480:00
E. Del MastroD000231-2221:290:00
W. KaiserD000000-1018:140:00
A. MartinezD000000-1016:410:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Knight30246.80060:00Loss
A. Soderblom000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamRyan Donato CHI Faces SEA, his team until May 20232 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreSEA 3.3, CHI 2.7SEA 6, CHI 2
Total goals6.18
Shots on goalSEA 29.7, CHI 24.9SEA 30, CHI 29
Win chanceSEA 59%SEA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
SEA B. Montour2.510.60116%0
SEA J. McCann2.420.73129%1
CHI R. Donato2.420.78026%0
SEA J. Schwartz2.330.61125%0
CHI C. Bedard2.340.84125%1
SEA V. Dunn2.020.70114%0
SEA E. Tolvanen2.020.57024%0
SEA M. Beniers1.920.64225%1
SEA J. Eberle1.920.67123%1
SEA K. Kakko1.800.59022%0
CHI I. Mikheyev1.730.48021%0
CHI F. Nazar1.600.50019%0
CHI T. Teravainen1.500.80024%0
SEA M. Eyssimont1.550.23110%0
SEA A. Burakovsky1.510.46216%0
CHI T. Bertuzzi1.520.52221%1
CHI N. Foligno1.360.44016%0
SEA A. Larsson1.320.3037%1
SEA S. Wright1.230.65223%2
SEA C. Stephenson1.210.79122%0
CHI C. Murphy1.130.2606%0
CHI C. Dach1.120.37013%0
CHI L. Slaggert1.130.28013%0
CHI W. Kaiser1.100.2406%0
CHI A. Vlasic1.100.3315%0
CHI J. Dickinson1.000.34015%0
CHI P. Maroon1.010.2809%0
SEA J. Oleksiak0.900.2315%0
SEA J. Mahura0.900.2003%0
CHI L. Reichel0.910.29110%0
SEA J. Hayden0.920.1207%0
CHI A. Martinez0.800.2407%0
CHI E. Mastro0.820.2708%0
SEA R. Evans0.710.3005%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 34 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.